I just knew they would be there. These guys I mean.
WARNING: BIG PICTURES
http://www.widescreengamingforum.com...ic.php?t=16780
I just knew they would be there. These guys I mean.
WARNING: BIG PICTURES
http://www.widescreengamingforum.com...ic.php?t=16780
Thanks ajaidev for the link.So the specs are official now,we have a power of 2 RV770 under one hood and with DX11 support too!This thing is going to kick all sorts of a** :)
http://www.generation-3d.com/UserImg...0/hd5870_3.jpg
Via Beyond3d Forums
@ what resolution? 1920x1200 4xAA, 16xAF? It really bothers me when people keep saying this card that card can handle high settings, max setting without giving the specific resolutions and settings.Quote:
Originally Posted by spoof
thats cool, link please !!Quote:
Originally Posted by spoof
Yeah 1920x1200 4xAA, 16xAF with an OC HD5870 but don't know the frequencies, the source is Chiphell in fact ...Quote:
Originally Posted by iTravis
well crysis or crysis warhead ? and last question which LEVEL ??? Ambush/frost/?Quote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
Thanks xsx112, here's the translated version:
So it's official. :cool::woot::toast::toast::toast::party::party::bo unces:Quote:
Yesterday, the trade press and other industry companies and individuals belonging to the new generation graphics card from AMD / ATI was presented. London, Munich and not to forget the USS Hornet were the locations of the presentations.
HD5850 - HD5870 - HD5870X2
Be final specifications of the available graphics cards at the start of the new series, the HD5850 and HD5870 have been announced. Thus, the HD5870 will work with a core clock of 850 MHz and a memory clock of 1200 MHz. As is well known that the GDDR5 memory of the 4th generation to be equipped. Also, the presumed 1600 shader units have been confirmed.
In the HD5850 you will need a GPU clock of 725 MHz and a memory clock of satisfied 1000 MHz. For the price it was said that the HD5870 will have to be below 400 U.S. dollars. Whether this now means that the HD5870 will have to be at a price of 399 U.S. dollars or a price of under 350 dollars is still unknown. To HD5870X2 there is no further information regarding specifications or prices. The HD5870X2 will be available several weeks after the two starting models.
For performance, the HD5870 was compared to the GTX285, which according to the measurements and benchmarks of AMD on average is about 50% faster. September will be launched and fully available.How this will not make it exactly, you can not say for sure.
Windows 7, DirectX 11 and Games
It was at the presentation of a lot of talk about DirectX 11 and of course Windows 7, games could not be missing. Thus, the new DirectX been proposes 11 techniques and the new games. BattleForge is according to our information even before the launch of Windows 7 to get an update, which furnish the DirectX 11 support.
Besides BattleForge was surprisingly STALKER: Call of known Pripyat, which will also support DirectX 11th Auch Alien vs. Also Alien vs. Predator has been named along with Colin McRae Rally: DiRT 2 as the new DirectX 11 titles, which will look stunning as specified by our source.
50% faster then 285? :confused:Quote:
For performance, the HD5870 was compared to the GTX285, which according to the measurements and benchmarks of AMD on average is about 50% faster.
yeah,old news.:rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim
sorry if i offended you,i was just amused at the fact that the exact same thing happened at B3D.:p:Quote:
Originally Posted by mursaat
I'm wondering how Nvidia is gonna respond to this? Another can of whoopass or huge price slashing.
Here are some naked shots of the GPU, still uses voltera voltage control
http://www.techpowerup.com/103599/AM..._Stripped.html
I thought it was going to end up faster then the 295, that's where my :confused: came from.Quote:
Originally Posted by gamervivek
Will the 5870X2 have 12 display ports?
295 is 45-50% faster than 285Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim
The normal 5870 only has 3 display outputs, if you take note of the marketing slide.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris_redfield
The 6 display port 5870 will be released at a later time in conjunction with Samsung's monitor line.
If I had to guess, the 5870 X2 will not have 6 outputs, much less 12.
50% faster then 2xx?
2xx is GTX285 or GTX295
I think it 's GTX295 !
the 50% figure from a gtx285 was with older drivers.So unless they hit a roadblock with optimisations or got too involved with other softwares,it should end up faster than a gtx295 quite easily.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim
Hope it is 50% faster then the 295
lol i doubt it will be 50% faster than GTX295
let's wait and see
not long to go now
Slightly slower or on par with GTX295,maybe faster on a few occasions . Just like 4890CF.
50% more then 285gtx makes quite sense since it puts it right next/a bit above the 4870x2.
And that's all we should be asking for imho. 50 percent faster than GTX 295... Jesus, are we in wonderland?Quote:
Originally Posted by Hornet331
well 50% more then 295 might be possible with the 5870x2. :p
50% more? Should be a bit more than that since this should be ~90-105% of a GTX295 (or >=2x4890). If we get similar scaling as now it would be 60-70% faster at least.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hornet331
indeed.. kudos ati.. wanna 5850... but for 170$ :p I'll wait.Quote:
Originally Posted by marten_larsson
Getting bored of Dullards trying to incorrectly correct me.Quote:
Originally Posted by largon
Lucky for me this guy already answered for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaredpace
I guess ^this^ is just because of the one fake dualcore RV870 die shot that Chiphell barfed upon us.
Modified specs about the HD 5870 (core clock , memory clock & compute power)
http://i30.tinypic.com/maw86p.jpg
source: http://www.arabhardware.net/forum/sh...d.php?t=133519
Bottom line, your hardly qualified to even try to correct me when there are manyQuote:
Originally Posted by largon
much more reputable sources than your imagination that say different.
At least now you agree in principal that it is a 'dual core' gpu.
are you going to call gt200 a quad core then ? :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhys
http://www.nordichardware.com/image3.php?id=5155
the src of that image in a post in forum which doesn't actually COMPARE run the other cards, nor provide details on the bench...Quote:
Originally Posted by spoof
Example of such reputable sources?Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhys
Chiphell? Random forum posts?
Hardware.info? (<- the same site that is known to post whatever they see on forums, eg. once they posted my own ramblings/speculation on RV790...)
Theo's brightside?
No. I do not.Quote:
At least now you agree in principal that it is a 'dual core' gpu.
Nice attitude, btw.
:up:
I hope the 2 intake vents cool the card adequately.
^Uh?
There's one big intake - the face of the fan. Just like on previous Radeon coolers.
They're not intake vents...Quote:
Originally Posted by clayton
Techincally noQuote:
Originally Posted by Rhys
The Cypress isn't two interlinked GPU's cores
Yes they did double SIMD cores,but it has still only single command processor,single thead processor and a single crossbar, the important bits of the GPU core.
The SIMD cores are modular,you can add or take away as many as you need.
The 4870
http://www.overclock.net/attachments...770archlx4.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by marten_larsson
Yes they are. PCI-E connectors are on the side.
^
The fact that PEG plugs are on the side doesn't mean the holes are intakes.
:stick:
They are exhausts the fan is the intake.Quote:
Originally Posted by largon
http://news.ati-forum.de/images/stor...ssslides/2.jpg
So the specs are all but confirmed...
Core clock is indeed 850 MHz. Strangely, they made no mention of it being 256-bit... maybe ATI pulled a fast one? :p:
Why would they direct air out the back? I'd want every bit of air a small blower fan can push going over the core heatsink of my 2.1b transistor chip...
Yeah, looks like the 48xx steam processor count scenario all over again where no one knew exactly how many until the last day.Quote:
Originally Posted by zerazax
If the 850Mhz clock speed does not match up with most rumors, maybe the same might apply to the memory bus as well!
i really think they should make the cards 1-2 cm taller (or just the heatsink shroud), the power plugs will already extend up, might as well give themselves more room to squeeze in a larger quieter fan.
Is it more, or are not enough people questioning the validity of the crysis benchmark, when there isn't even a damn screenshot.
given that this thing barely uses any power at idol, I shouldn't imagine the fan needs to be very fast at all. When your gaming the noise of the game should drown out the noise from the fan anyway, Unless your one of those who like to stick massive full size atx cases on their desk???Quote:
Originally Posted by Manicdan
Personally I prefer my case to be concealed under my diy computer desk.
oh, i think 8xxAQuote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
people wouldnt be complaining about these coolers if there wasnt an issueQuote:
Originally Posted by Rhys
with the new AA 'technique' they're using with the 58xx's 4xAA will probably look the same on a 5870 as 8xAA on a GT200.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaul
Well we don't actually know there is one yet with this card do we?Quote:
Originally Posted by Manicdan
So you have read the reviews already? Great...Quote:
Originally Posted by Manicdan
People only complain because the exhaust port is too little, and of course they know a lot more than amd themselves
In fact, the people who actually used/heard the card first hand say that its a very quiet card. Ill just wait till the reviews come out, and then when it does hopefully turn out to be quiet, it should silence the critics.
I guess some will still complain about the port being too little :shrug:
if were talking about heat problems your right we dont know, if its the fans noise to airflow ratio, its probably going to be the same as the rest from the previous 3 years.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhys
i just think it wouldnt have any negative impacts if they decided to put in a bigger fan (a 1-2 cm increase would probably work just fine and not be too hard to fit in there) if they are plugging in power through the top, they they must have extra room up there.
imagine every review showing how their stock cooler can keep it cooler and quieter than the competition. alot of people would look at that as a 50$ savings over having an aftermarket one, or waiting a year for the nice coolers to come out on cards that go for 30-50$ over the rest. noise is a big selling point, and they should recognize it finally.
Yeh I agree with the issue on noise. I will be swapping out the stock cooler for an after market one simply because I like absolute silence.Quote:
Originally Posted by Manicdan