It is not up to date but you may check here:
http://www.geeks3d.com/20120413/furm...rative-charts/
Printable View
It is not up to date but you may check here:
http://www.geeks3d.com/20120413/furm...rative-charts/
Surprisingly accurate all the way from 2011:
http://i1-news.softpedia-static.com/...ny-Slide-3.png
Maxwell cannot come out soon enough.
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-preparing...h-expected-q3/
NVIDIA Preparing Cut Down GTX Titan GK110 GPU
The GK110 GPU on the GeForce GTX Titan had 14 SMX units enabled out of the total 15 available on the Kepler die. This cut down version would have 13 SMX units enabled on the GK110 GPU which would give 2496 cores which is still much higher than the GeForce GTX 680′s 1536 cores. The cut down GK110 GPU would feature a 5 GB GDDR5 memory running across a 320-bit interface compared to 6 GB GDDR5 (384-bit) on the faster GeForce GTX Titan.
Nothing else as far as the naming scheme and pricing details were unveiled. One thing is for certain though that this cut down GK110 GPU won’t set you back at a hefty cost of $1000 US as the GeForce GTX Titan and should be around $699 – $799 at most.
So do you guys think we are still looking at a december 700 series launch?
Really? Link? That timing makes more sense then, and it would then seem that Titan will remain as the flasgship with the cut-down Titan likely to fill the 780 spot, right?
The big question is- will a highly overclockable cut down Titan, with a nice PCB and power circuitry (Lightning, SOC, DCuII) outperform a Titan? Maybe not a flashed and modded Titan, buit how much can the ref design take?
:)