-
I really don't want to seem like I'm crapping on anyone's results... But I've found it totally impossible to get a truely stable overclock beyond 457 fsb... I can get into windows at 500x8 and run super-pi, test prime stable for several hours... These forms of stress don't really seem to simulate actual load any more... But really loading up my computer with Linpack proves instability rather quickly... Or attempting to play crysis will crash me also... And almost invariably the computer randomly locks up(indeterminate amount of time)...
My whole system is watercooled, so I've even resorted to trying rather ridiculous voltages, all the way up and down the tree...
Anyway, I think the short of this is that I think people need to stop using superpi and prime as methods for testing, as they no longer properly emulate load situations.
-
That's because your Mobo ain't as good as a P45 for FSB on a Quad (Gigabyte P45 seems to be best) and probably a Dual also (any P45).
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zoson
Anyway, I think the short of this is that I think people need to stop using superpi and prime as methods for testing, as they no longer properly emulate load situations.
these tests do not include 3d gametests but are perefctly fine to get an idea about stability... load hyperpi with an instance for each core, you will have a hard time to get it stable... 450FSB is already pretty good mate on a i780 or i790 platform with a quad... Nvidia chipsets tend to run too hot and totally crap out with quads and DDR3 makes the strain on the NB even harder... Your instability is due to the Nvidia chipset... they are far too erratic in behaviour...
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Leeghoofd
these tests do not include 3d gametests but are perefctly fine to get an idea about stability... load hyperpi with an instance for each core, you will have a hard time to get it stable... 450FSB is already pretty good mate on a i780 or i790 platform with a quad... Nvidia chipsets tend to run too hot and totally crap out with quads and DDR3 makes the strain on the NB even harder... Your instability is due to the Nvidia chipset... they are far too erratic in behaviour...
I hear what you're saying, but with this same motherboard and my E8600 I can do 4.4GHz at 550FSB with very little voltage. I can do 4.7GHz with the same chip and lower FSB...
Is the increased FSB load of a quad really so much greater that this board would croak at 100FSB less?
My northbridge is watercooled. It peaks out around 80C with 1.85v and 500fsb at full load with the quad... With the dual it peaks out around 60C with 1.38v and 550FSB...
Anyway, what I would really like to see is one of these guys hitting ~550 fsb with a quad on one of these P45 boards is to prove what everyone is saying to me... Run 500 LinX loops and show the screenshot of it finishing.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zoson
I hear what you're saying, but with this same motherboard and my E8600 I can do 4.4GHz at 550FSB with very little voltage. I can do 4.7GHz with the same chip and lower FSB...
Is the increased FSB load of a quad really so much greater that this board would croak at 100FSB less?
My northbridge is watercooled. It peaks out around 80C with 1.85v and 500fsb at full load with the quad... With the dual it peaks out around 60C with 1.38v and 550FSB...
Anyway, what I would really like to see is one of these guys hitting ~550 fsb with a quad on one of these P45 boards is to prove what everyone is saying to me... Run 500 LinX loops and show the screenshot of it finishing.
What do you mean by this?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zucker2k
What do you mean by this?
I think that he says so cauz he didnt tried the GIGABYTE world yet, still on Asus so i can feel his pain :rofl:
Cheers :up:
Sergio
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Leeghoofd
these tests do not include 3d gametests but are perefctly fine to get an idea about stability... load hyperpi with an instance for each core, you will have a hard time to get it stable... 450FSB is already pretty good mate on a i780 or i790 platform with a quad... Nvidia chipsets tend to run too hot and totally crap out with quads and DDR3 makes the strain on the NB even harder... Your instability is due to the Nvidia chipset... they are far too erratic in behaviour...
Leeg hyperpi assigns a thread to each core so no need to do it manually inmo, and yes NVIDIA + QUAD no go agree on that
Cheers :up:
Sergio
-
If you guys are so stable on gigabyte/p45 at these speeds, prove it by running 500 LinX loops, is what I'm saying. Because right now, I can show what you are all showing. My computer will run for 10 seconds and complete a superpi. It will also run for 8+ hours of prime95 at 520fsb, but it crashes after 30 or so LinX loops.
So once again, prove your overclocks are stable with P45. If you're so confident, there should be nothing stopping you from running LinX like I ask. Right now I think you guys arn't actually stable.
-
hi andressergio. I see u have Gskill PI 1200 2x2GB ram. I got them too and I wonder what is the max voltage to run on them whitout active cooling and what max freguencies/ latencies can i expect from them?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zoson
If you guys are so stable on gigabyte/p45 at these speeds, prove it by running 500 LinX loops, is what I'm saying. Because right now, I can show what you are all showing. My computer will run for 10 seconds and complete a superpi. It will also run for 8+ hours of prime95 at 520fsb, but it crashes after 30 or so LinX loops.
So once again, prove your overclocks are stable with P45. If you're so confident, there should be nothing stopping you from running LinX like I ask. Right now I think you guys arn't actually stable.
We dont have anything to prove that hasn't been prooved mate maybe you need to read some pages back...but its a known fact that giga UD3P's kick ass on quads...try to get yours at 500x9 stable at least and show the proof...either way show your screen at 520x9 that would be nice :up:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zoson
If you guys are so stable on gigabyte/p45 at these speeds, prove it by running 500 LinX loops, is what I'm saying. Because right now, I can show what you are all showing. My computer will run for 10 seconds and complete a superpi. It will also run for 8+ hours of prime95 at 520fsb, but it crashes after 30 or so LinX loops.
So once again, prove your overclocks are stable with P45. If you're so confident, there should be nothing stopping you from running LinX like I ask. Right now I think you guys arn't actually stable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
andressergio
We dont have anything to prove that hasn't been prooved mate maybe you need to read some pages back...but its a known fact that giga UD3P's kick ass on quads...try to get yours at 500x9 stable at least and show the proof...either way show your screen at 520x9 that would be nice :up:
You beat me to it Sergio. The guy is only stable at 457 and he wants to see what? :ROTF:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kagula323
hi andressergio. I see u have Gskill PI 1200 2x2GB ram. I got them too and I wonder what is the max voltage to run on them whitout active cooling and what max freguencies/ latencies can i expect from them?
you can expect a lot of them mate, i use them at 2,2 - 2,26 daily and benched them many times at 2,4+ CL5 you may want to read some pages back also what we've been posting with OC nub
Cheers mate :up:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
andressergio
We dont have anything to prove that hasn't been prooved mate maybe you need to read some pages back...but its a known fact that giga UD3P's kick ass on quads...try to get yours at 500x9 stable at least and show the proof...either way show your screen at 520x9 that would be nice :up:
I didn't say I was using the 9x multiplier, and in fact my screenshots on the last page SHOW I'm using the 8x multiplier.
Like I said, I can easily boot up to even 560FSB, but it is not stable. Taking a screenshot of superpi doesn't prove anything... 10 seconds of stress is nothing... So in reality, you do still have a LOT to prove.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zucker2k
You beat me to it Sergio. The guy is only stable at 457 and he wants to see what? :ROTF:
Yet you are the guys who are claiming to be stable at 550+ FSB and show no proof. Once again, 10 seconds of superpi stress is nothing. A screenshot of superpi or prime does not prove stability any more. Period.
And as you can see with my stability testing, I was at minimum 200 Linx loops stable at 550fsb on my e8600. Which is something NONE of you can say about your overclocks.
I'll boot up at 560 and do a superpi for you tonight. But honestly I think you guys all just call it a day and say 'stable' way too easily.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zoson
I didn't say I was using the 9x multiplier, and in fact my screenshots on the last page SHOW I'm using the 8x multiplier.
Like I said, I can easily boot up to even 560FSB, but it is not stable. Taking a screenshot of superpi doesn't prove anything... 10 seconds of stress is nothing... So in reality, you do still have a LOT to prove.
mate we have nothing to prove to ya we just did it months ago :up:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zucker2k
You beat me to it Sergio. The guy is only stable at 457 and he wants to see what? :ROTF:
yeah ! i have a short tale
i was once upon a time a poor Asus user that couldn't get over that on FSB....
gigabyte
the end. :rofl:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
andressergio
mate we have nothing to prove to ya we just did it months ago :up:
But you didn't.
Saying you did something, when you in fact did not, makes you look like a poser.
If you did, repost the images. Why are you so scared to prove me wrong?
I've read all 112 pages of this thread. I had read them all before I posted.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zoson
Yet you are the guys who are claiming to be stable at 550+ FSB and show no proof. Once again, 10 seconds of superpi stress is nothing. A screenshot of superpi or prime does not prove stability any more. Period.
And as you can see with my stability testing, I was at minimum 200 Linx loops stable at 550fsb on my e8600. Which is something NONE of you can say about your overclocks.
I'll boot up at 560 and do a superpi for you tonight. But honestly I think you guys all just call it a day and say 'stable' way too easily.
http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/9162/blend95501.jpg
http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/7183/blend95502.jpg
http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/7859/9550blend3.jpg
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/9803/965045ghz.jpg
All done on Gigabyte p45's, 2 different p45 giga boards,2 different c2q cpu's. a q9550 and a q9650.
If you take the time to read the threads you will see the stable oc's posted by many.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
andressergio
yeah ! i have a short tale
i was once upon a time a poor Asus user that couldn't get over that on FSB....
gigabyte
the end. :rofl:
:rofl:
Great story!
I consider Prime95 a fine way to test your CPU stability...
If your overclocks are stable enough for your uses, why do you need more?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zoson
But you didn't.
Saying you did something, when you in fact did not, makes you look like a poser.
If you did, repost the images. Why are you so scared to prove me wrong?
I've read all 112 pages of this thread. I had read them all before I posted.
you should be of this Q9650 @ 4.115 9x457 :rofl: 457 is soooo maraca :rofl:
you enter on a thread with 19 post attacking ppl i think if you run your asus your beloved 500 linx loops some mosfet will blow up and rip you an eye
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zoson
But you didn't.
Saying you did something, when you in fact did not, makes you look like a poser.
If you did, repost the images. Why are you so scared to prove me wrong?
I've read all 112 pages of this thread. I had read them all before I posted.
Sergio has proven STABLE overclocks far beyond what your nvidia board will ever do using a 45nm quad. You come to this thread being an ass and really deserve no response.
When you top these oc's on your nvidia chipset board using a c2quad please come back and post your results. Until then learn to show respect to others in this great thread.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OC Nub
Sergio has proven STABLE overclocks far beyond what your nvidia board will ever do using a 45nm quad. You come to this thread being an ass and really deserve no response.
When you top these oc's on your nvidia chipset board using a c2quad please come back and post your results. Until then learn to show respect to others in this great thread.
+1 for that :up:
-
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zoson
Yet you are the guys who are claiming to be stable at 550+ FSB and show no proof. Once again, 10 seconds of superpi stress is nothing. A screenshot of superpi or prime does not prove stability any more. Period.
And as you can see with my stability testing, I was at minimum 200 Linx loops stable at 550fsb on my e8600. Which is something NONE of you can say about your overclocks.
I'll boot up at 560 and do a superpi for you tonight. But honestly I think you guys all just call it a day and say 'stable' way too easily.
Wow, and I thought I needed to chill, lol.
You think that I am posting my SuperPI results to show stability? If you think this you are mistaken. Im not trying to prove anything, including stability. Im trying to get my times faster and faster.
Why is that word "stability" still disputed. In fact the word is really subjective, and is defined differently from person to person, as it should be. Why are you trying to force people to accept your definition. For me I dont see any point in doing 12hrs Prime Blend, as long as I can play my games, edit and convert video, surf the web, Im fully stable for my needs. I do completely see why someone would need to have their system 12hrs + prime Stable, especially if their folding 24/7.
-
Does 30 minutes of priming at 8x525 fsb count? :D Sorry, couldn't help it. I could show you more, but you don't deserve it. How about you show me a quad at 8x512 32M? That shouldn't be too difficult? :p:
http://www.hostthenpost.org/uploads/...8ecb7bed43.jpg
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Viper
Wow, and I thought I needed to chill, lol.
You think that I am posting my SuperPI results to show stability? If you think this you are mistaken. Im not trying to prove anything, including stability. Im trying to get my times faster and faster.
Why is that word "stability" still disputed. In fact the word is really subjective, and is defined differently from person to person, as it should be. Why are you trying to force people to accept your definition. For me I dont see any point in doing 12hrs Prime Blend, as long as I can play my games, edit and convert video, surf the web, Im fully stable for my needs. I do completely see why someone would need to have their system 12hrs + prime Stable, especially if their folding 24/7.
Viper he did say it 500 linx loops :rofl:, or maybe 1,5 month prime blend ? that should be enough for him i think
And we dont think that you where posting stability we think you were just enjoying ya rig as we like to do...sad that his soooo limited
Cheers :up:
Sergio
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zucker2k
Does 30 minutes of priming at 8x525 fsb count? :D Sorry, couldn't help it. I could show you more, but you don't deserve it. How about you show me a quad at 8x512 32M? That shouldn't be too difficult? :p:
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zucker2k
Very nice results Zucker.
-
Hehe, I love my Asus board!! Haha. Who is this guy? I was going to say the same thing, 19 posts and his way is the only way its to be done? And were did anyone say we are posting SuperPI times to show/prove stability? I sure as hell wasn't. I was only going for speed and faster times.
I started with a P5E3 Premium x48 with my Q9450 then switched over to a Q9650 and P5Q3 Deluxe P45 and saw huge improvements. No, they weren't what you Gigabyte guys are getting but P45 showed huge improvements over x48 with my Quad testing. I don't bench my Q9650 but still have it running 24/7 4.2Ghz in my media center server. I could play any game I wanted and encode dvds all day long so it was 100% stable for me, that's all that mattered.
Here are some shots that I have from my Q9650 / P45 testing.
http://i580.photobucket.com/albums/s...0Mhz_20min.jpg
http://i580.photobucket.com/albums/s...i_1M_10498.jpg
http://i580.photobucket.com/albums/s..._10m52657s.jpg
http://i580.photobucket.com/albums/s...4_PhysXoff.jpg
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
deachus
Hehe, I love my Asus board!! Haha. Who is this guy? I was going to say the same thing, 19 posts and his way is the only way its to be done? And were did anyone say we are posting SuperPI times to show/prove stability? I sure as hell wasn't. I was only going for speed and faster times.
I started with a P5E3 Premium x48 with my Q9450 then switched over to a Q9650 and P5Q3 Deluxe P45 and saw huge improvements. No, they weren't what you Gigabyte guys are getting but P45 showed huge improvements over x48 with my Quad testing. I don't bench my Q9650 but still have it running 24/7 4.2Ghz in my media center server. I could play any game I wanted and encode dvds all day long so it was 100% stable for me, that's all that mattered.
jeje thats awesome mate but look at your P45 rev ;) A3 thats the good one
Cheers and congrats
Sergio
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OC Nub
Very nice results Zucker.
Thanks Nub.
Ladies and gents, I present to you, 500 loops of linpack! Easy as pie; took less than a minute :rolleyes:
:eek: :ROTF:
http://www.hostthenpost.org/uploads/...2d256f65bb.jpg
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zucker2k
Thanks Nub.
Ladies and gents, I present to you, 500 loops of linpack! Easy as pie; took less than a minute :rolleyes:
:eek: :ROTF:
That proves it, there you go! :yepp:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Good job. :ROTF:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zucker2k
muaaaajaaaaaa there it goes first 500 loops ever :clap:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zucker2k
Thanks Nub.
Ladies and gents, I present to you, 500 loops of linpack! Easy as pie; took less than a minute :rolleyes:
:eek: :ROTF:
LMAO! Awesome :up:
-
1000 lets go for more !!!
-
IT'S OVER 9000!!!!1!1!!!!!1!
:ROTF:
10000 PASSES BABY!
http://ense7en.com/pics/LinX%20GFlop...sting/9000.jpg
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
-n7-
:rofl::ROTF::clap:
-
Use all memory when you use LinX.
Here you go. Like I said... SuperPI is easy, and by no means a measure of stability.
8x520
http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r...0mhz-8x520.jpg
9x500
http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r...0mhz-9x500.jpg
Working on that 560 now, it's a bit harder to catch a SuperPI at that fsb.
-
8.5x500
downloaded the new superpi.
http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r...mhz-85x500.jpg
At least I'm honest about what's stable and what's not.
-
Who has been claiming SPI 1M to be a measure of stability?
-
I don't think zoson gets that we are joking around with the LinX results...
Yeah, & as for stability, i want to see LinX max RAM 10+ passes & P95 Large 3+ hrs. before i'd say you're anywhere close ;)
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hoss331
Who has been claiming SPI 1M to be a measure of stability?
This guy has:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OC Nub
Sergio has proven STABLE overclocks far beyond what your nvidia board will ever do using a 45nm quad. You come to this thread being an ass and really deserve no response.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hoss331
Who has been claiming SPI 1M to be a measure of stability?
Cliff none of use and if you where to use it we use hyperpi that at least out more stress but he's telling erratics things seems his started showing no respect so we will not respect...
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zoson
Ok then show 2 instances of linx 500 loops it at time on that OC the way we are joking so at least you practice what you preach :up:
-
My "not" stable results on P45 :D
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zoson
DAMN you look good on that pic :rofl:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Loco23
Nice Loco23 your NOT stable results are crazy how you dare NOT to post 500 linx :rofl:
-
I'm at work now. Maybe i'll do it later, but I afraid to disappoint zoson:rofl:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Loco23
I'm at work now. Maybe i'll do it later, but I afraid to disappoint zoson:rofl:
damn i put my racing helmet just in case something blow and shoot 2 linxs 500at time...try it mate but use protection :rofl:
-
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
andressergio
Cliff none of use and if you where to use it we use hyperpi that at least out more stress but he's telling erratics things seems his started showing no respect so we will not respect...
Oh I know, I was just curious who he thought used SPI 1M for stability runs.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OC Nub
Sergio has proven STABLE overclocks far beyond what your nvidia board will ever do using a 45nm quad. You come to this thread being an ass and really deserve no response.
When you top these oc's on your nvidia chipset board using a c2quad please come back and post your results. Until then learn to show respect to others in this great thread.
Well said! :up:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hoss331
Oh I know, I was just curious who he thought used SPI 1M for stability runs.
yes we all use it for fun no more than that
cheers hoss :up:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
andressergio
Cliff none of use and if you where to use it we use hyperpi that at least out more stress but he's telling erratics things seems his started showing no respect so we will not respect...
That's not true. Just go back and look at everything I said. You guys were the ones getting defensive and over reacting. Not to mention I haven't said anything "erratic." If there's anything erratic, it's your terrible english causing you to misunderstand things, and your manic reactions as a result of your lack of understanding.
You can see in my first post to the thread, I pulled 550FSB 200 LinX stable Max Mem on this motherboard with a different CPU already. I came in here asking for help and all I got was flames and nobody willing to actually *prove* to me what they were saying is true. If that were the kind of welcome you were met with asking questions, what would you think? Right, that everyone in this thread is a pack of liars.
It took me basically twisting peoples arms until I finally started seeing something worthwhile. Not to mention the biggest talkers like you Sergio have yet to post anything actually relevant - other than a screenshot of you running linx at an overclock lower than mine. All you do is make fun of my overclocks and my equipment. You say I'm not respectful. Look in a mirror, hater.
Oh, and where's this SLI hack that everyone says is out there? All I find in Google when I search for it is threads about how the author disappeared, it only ran in safe mode anyway, and it was never actually released.
-
zoson, overclock Quad it's not the same that overclock Duo. Many mobo can 550 with Duo, but the same mobo can't even 470-480 with Quad.
>500 with Quad is VERY HARD.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Loco23
zoson, overclock Quad it's not the same that overclock Duo. Many mobo can 550 with Duo, but the same mobo can't even 470-480 with Quad.
>500 with Quad is VERY HARD.
My P5E3 Premium X48 could clock well over 525FSB on E8600 but could BARELY get 450FSB stable with my Q9450 and Q9650. Entirely different ball game when switching to QUAD.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zoson
Oh, and where's this SLI hack that everyone says is out there? All I find in Google when I search for it is threads about how the author disappeared, it only ran in safe mode anyway, and it was never actually released.
Sometimes you have to look a little further than the Intel forum on XS. :D
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=231383
Already proven that it works on an ASUS Rampage Formula board by Ghostleader. :up:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...81921&page=122
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zoson
This guy has:
I have NEVER posted a spi run, especially as a test for stability. I always post blend. If you had read the thread as you say, you would know this and also have seen Sergios blend runs along with those posted by the other fine people in this thread. I am still waiting to see some impressive oc's from you. Show us some blend at 4500mzh@ your 1.5+vcore, or maybe 500 passes of LinX, as that is your standard of stability.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OC Nub
I have NEVER posted a spi run, especially as a test for stability. I always post blend. If you had read the thread as you say, you would know this and also have seen Sergios blend runs along with those posted by the other fine people in this thread. I am still waiting to see some impressive oc's from you. Show us some blend at 4500mzh@ your 1.5+vcore, or maybe 500 passes of LinX, as that is your standard of stability.
yeah i want to see that also as he stated the new standard for OC stability
500 linx passes
-
Hi fellas. Been reading this thread for a while, decided to finally join the forum, as most of you directly responsible for me dumping more money into my system lol. I am planning to switch to i7-870, but before I do I wanted to push my q9650 and ep45-dq6 as far as it can go. I got her now @ 4.4Ghz for 24/7 use, but I think my vcore is a lil high. Idling in CPU-z it shows something like 1.456...
I AM SORRY IF THIS IS THE WRONG PLACE TO POST THIS! I did search the form first and found a thread for my board, but it was mostly tech discussion there rather than oc...
Anyway got a 8hrs stable test @ 4.4Ghz with this settings. Was trying to see if it will actually go past 4.3. I think my CPU Vcore is still too high. 1.53 just makes me nervous. I think I will lower it a bit and try it again. Saw a post somewhere with my quad and same board running at 4.5 24/7 and benched at 4.9, so I know it is doable. Now I just need to work out what is holding me back. Still need to figure out reference mess. Temps look totally fine, highest it got was 56*C, but my room is at like 77*F right now...
Here're my current settings.
MB Intelligent Tweaker(M.I.T.)
Robust Graphics Booster ..................: [FAST]
CPU Clock Ratio ..............................: 9
Fine CPU Clock Ratio.........................:
CPU Frequency ...............................: 4.40Ghz(489 x 9)
Clock Chip Control
Standard Clock Control
CPU Host Clock Control...................: [Enabled]
CPU Host Frequency (Mhz) .............: [489]
PCI Express Frequency (Mhz) ..........: [100]
CIA2 - disabled
Advanced Clock Control [Press Enter]
CPU Clock Drive...........................: 1000mv
PCI Express Clock Drive.................: 900mv
CPU Clock Skew (ps)....................: 100
MCH Clock Skew (ps)....................: 100
DRAM Performance Control
Performance Enhance....................: [STANDARD]
Extreme Memory Profile (X.M.P.)........: Disabled
(G)MCH Frequency Latch.................: [AUTO]
System Memory Multiplier ..............: [2.00D]
Memory Frequency (Mhz) ................: [978]
DRAM Timing Selectable ................: [manual]
Standard Timing Control
CAS Latency Time..........................:5
tRCD ...........................................:5
tRP'.............................................: 5
tRAS............................................:1 5
Advanced Timing Control
tRRD............................................:A uto
tWTR.......................................... :Auto
tWR.............................................:A uto
tRFC............................................:A uto
tRTP...........................................:Au to
Command Rate (CMD) ....................:2
Channel A
Static tRead Value.........................10
tRD Phase0 Adjustment...................:Auto
tRD Phase1 Adjustment...................:Auto
tRD Phase2 Adjustment .................:Auto
tRD Phase3 Adjustment..................:Auto
Trd2rd(Different Rank)....................:Auto
Twr2wr(Different Rank)...................:Auto
Twr2rd(Different Rank)...................:Auto
Trd2wr(Same/Diff Rank)..................:Auto
Dimm1 Clock Skew Control...............:Auto ps
Dimm2 Clock Skew Control...............:Auto ps
Channel B
Static tRead Value.........................:10
tRD Phase0 Adjustment...................:Auto
tRD Phase1 Adjustment...................:Auto
tRD Phase2 Adjustment .................:Auto
tRD Phase3 Adjustment..................:Auto
Trd2rd(Different Rank)....................:Auto
Twr2wr(Different Rank)...................:Auto
Twr2rd(Different Rank)...................:Auto
Trd2wr(Same/Diff Rank)..................:Auto
Dimm1 Clock Skew Control...............:Auto ps
Dimm2 Clock Skew Control...............:Auto ps
Motherboard Voltage Control
Voltage Type.………... Manual
CPU
CPU Vcore….……….......1.250v*........: 1,53125V
CPU Termination…..... 1.200V*.......: 1,300v
CPU PLL…………………....1.500V*.......: 1,560v
CPU Referen.…………....0.760V*.......: Auto
CPU Reference2………,,0.800V*.......: Auto
MCH/ICH
MCH Core…………….....1.100V...........: 1,300v
MCH Reference….…….0.760V...........; Auto
MCH/DRAM Ref.…......0.900V...........: Auto
ICH I/O……………….....1.500V............: Auto
DRAM
DRAM Voltage ……....1.800V............: 2,220V
DRAM Termination .…0.900V............: Auto
Channel A Reference 0.900V............: Auto
Channel B Reference 0.900V............: Auto
Advanced Settings
Limit CPUID Max. to 3 ------------------ : [Disabled]
No-Execute Memory Protect -------------- : [Enabeld]
CPU Enhanced Halt (C1E) ---------------- : [Disabled]
C2/C2E State Support ------------------- : [Disabled]
x C4/C4E State Support ----------------- : [Disabled]
CPU Thermal Monitor 2 (TM2) ------------ : [Enabled]
CPU EIST Function --------------------- : [Disabled]
Virtualization Technology -------------- : [Disabled]
Like I said I am somewhat new to this... any help will be appreciate it. My final goal is 4.5 for 24/7 and try to bench her at 4.8-4.9... then I can retire this CPU
