oh, no !:shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by SubZero.it
Printable View
oh, no !:shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by SubZero.it
And if they want to put nV guys for long sleepless nights...;) Well, at the expense of not so high profit margin for each card.Quote:
Originally Posted by natty
NO WAI! :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by SubZero.it
i believe radeon 6870 will be faster than gt300. and the 6870x2 will be faster than the gt300 "gx2" (i'm wondering how he even came up with gx2, as it wasn't used since the 9800gx2...) as well! so, do i get my own news by fudzilla now? :):):)
:ROTF:
*edit* btw... i saw the benchmarks (which are also in the techpowerup leakage collection) where they tested wolfenstein with AA. since AA doesn't work in wolfenstein for 4800 series cards i'm wondering if it'll work flawlessly with the 5800 series?
Watch the video and you'll understandQuote:
Originally Posted by vietthanhpro
The techpowerup 5xxx leak collection
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/A...0_Leaks/1.html
I chuckle at the amount of watermarking when none of them came from TPU lol. They got tricked by the fake die-shot too.Quote:
Originally Posted by SubZero.it
EDIT:NVM They wrote there it's fake.
Source Tweakers.netQuote:
New update, temperatures and fan speed.
Idle, check also the GPU and memory clock.
Idle @ 20%
http://i25.tinypic.com/e297s.png
Idle @ 50%
http://i30.tinypic.com/2py6edh.png
Idle @ 100% (Like a hairdryer!)
http://i27.tinypic.com/23kukg7.png
Load test, stressed the GPU to 75%.
Load @ 20% (91° and rising)
http://i31.tinypic.com/waq4ib.png
Load @ 30% (default fan speed, stable at 75°)
http://i25.tinypic.com/dbqlj.png
Load @ 50%
http://i28.tinypic.com/jhtq3l.jpg
Load @ 100%
http://i30.tinypic.com/k1572c.png
Finally stressed the GPU to 95%, but the temperature was not rising.
http://i30.tinypic.com/9q8wzp.png
So we can expect real benchmarks soon? What's the point of them covering that part when the first pic shows everything? Very nice idle temps.
Mistake? I saved the pic anyway, just in case.Quote:
Originally Posted by blindbox
Anyway, they seem to be fakes.
20 % Fan, 75 % load on GPU: 91 C
30 % Fan, 75 % load on GPU: 75 C
30 % Fan, 95 % load on GPU: 74 C
Right. :rolleyes:
If anything, the pics may be telling that the temp/noise levels will be around the same that of HD4k series cards. Afterall, they use the same fan and the temps seem to be quite close.
This source, unlike many others, has no reason to post fake stuff or re-post stuff as if they are the source ;).Quote:
Originally Posted by Calmatory
It's possible that it runs on 100% speeds when it switches to 3D mode and just keeps the same temprature.
good test with fan speed and temps
but whats the highest quiet and inaudible settings?
No 2D/3D clocks? ;)
What's probably true here is the issue with temp and noise will be the same with 4800 series. In that case, what we got to know is if the sockets are still the same so that aftermarket heatsinks that used to fit 4800's will fit these... Can't bear that stock fan of theirs.
It's funny that he blanked out his monitor text (the stuff in square brackets) in all but the first image. I don't get that.
um, 850/1200 1.063/1.45vQuote:
Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR
157/300 .850v/???v
I don't care about their reasons behind the stuff they spit out, but the information is clearly false. It does not make sense any way. UNLESS, the load figures don't come from the same program. E.g. other one(95 %) is random game and other(75 %) is Furmark. And in that case, the information is still false.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vipeax
What I suspect is that the 95 % load figure is taken like half a minute after the load started, and the 75 % figure is taken 30 minutes since the load started. "But but full load regardless ;););)".
Seems that Tweakers.net is yet another site which to stay away from. :down: :down:
Good to see powerplay working full swing, hopefully the auto fan speed control will actually work this time around as well.
why false? crysis at 75% still heats up more than far cry 2 at 100%.Quote:
Originally Posted by Calmatory
looks legit to me.
edit- hmm not much different from juniper
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/8876/junip.jpg
As I said in my post, in that case the information is still false, or at least misleading. Holding absolutely zero value and misleading anyone who believes in it. Garbage, BS.Quote:
Originally Posted by gamervivek
The 75 % and 95 % values hold no information if the values and the temps aren't measured with same software stressing the GPU. AND I am sure that EVERYONE knows this. Just pulling off stunts like this is just as BS as pulling the values off from ones hat. Selective results. PR at it's best. No value for the end user. Misleading information.
We can say the same about your post so woop de doo. :wiggle:Quote:
Originally Posted by Calmatory
If you "can", go ahead and say the same. Back up your claims and we will discuss. Until then I stand behind my word that the results are false, or at least misleading at best.Quote:
Originally Posted by Glow9
:doh: You're right.Quote:
Originally Posted by jaredpace
those fanspeed and temp values look weird indeed...
So the mem clocks throttle down now too? That should make for some nice idle power usage stats.
idle power was suppose to be 28W, this is looking to be true.
Not only do the clocks lower at idle for the GDDR5 but also the voltage is lowered plus they fixed the screen flickering due to clock switching.Quote:
Originally Posted by Power5