Here's a little teaser....

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

10-17-2007, 12:02 AM
linhvndiy

i will have supermicro board fully support barcelona today. I will try to do some bench tonight.:D
And the prime test too.:D
10-17-2007, 02:11 AM
linhvndiy

This is prime test with supermicro mainboard, cpu df at 1900mhz. I think this main run fastest, mem controller run at 1600mhz instead 1400mhz on tyan.
[Tue Oct 16 20:24:36 2007]
Compare your results to other computers at http://www.mersenne.org/bench.htm
Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2347
CPU speed: 1899.93 MHz, 8 cores
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, Prefetch, 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 64 KB
L2 cache size: 512 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 64 bytes
L1 TLBS: 48
L2 TLBS: 512
Prime95 32-bit version 25.5, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 768K FFT length: 28.360 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 33.302 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 37.527 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 47.124 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 59.104 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 68.229 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 78.122 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 103.002 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 128.072 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 151.523 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 171.648 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 221.236 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 270.341 ms.
[Wed Oct 17 02:45:58 2007]
Compare your results to other computers at http://www.mersenne.org/bench.htm
Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2347
CPU speed: 1962.65 MHz, 8 cores
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, Prefetch, 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 64 KB
L2 cache size: 512 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 64 bytes
L1 TLBS: 48
L2 TLBS: 512
Prime95 32-bit version 25.5, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 768K FFT length: 28.068 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 33.749 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 36.768 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 41.592 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 53.454 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 69.192 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 78.336 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 104.301 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 127.017 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 150.510 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 170.562 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 220.077 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 269.423 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 326.853 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 373.289 ms.
Timing FFTs using 2 threads.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 16.063 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 23.582 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 26.356 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 31.061 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 37.191 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 43.552 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 49.355 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 66.939 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 79.434 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 92.848 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 104.647 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 130.025 ms.
[Wed Oct 17 02:50:18 2007]
Compare your results to other computers at http://www.mersenne.org/bench.htm
Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2347
CPU speed: 1909.87 MHz, 8 cores
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, Prefetch, 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 64 KB
L2 cache size: 512 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 64 bytes
L1 TLBS: 48
L2 TLBS: 512
Prime95 32-bit version 25.5, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 768K FFT length: 27.935 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 33.206 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 37.916 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 46.703 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 58.223 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 69.253 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 78.543 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 103.744 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 126.878 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 148.956 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 170.245 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 219.297 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 267.964 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 324.853 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 370.556 ms.
Timing FFTs using 2 threads.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 16.163 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 23.021 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 26.109 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 31.032 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 37.103 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 43.269 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 49.260 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 66.193 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 79.358 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 92.148 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 105.078 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 130.060 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 161.614 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 195.442 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 221.939 ms.
Timing FFTs using 3 threads.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 13.809 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 21.811 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 24.318 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 28.503 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 33.089 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 37.643 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 42.105 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 59.491 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 68.819 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 78.486 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 87.776 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 96.075 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 115.049 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 134.383 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 152.169 ms.
Timing FFTs using 4 threads.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 12.659 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 20.397 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 22.734 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 26.702 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 30.707 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 34.792 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 38.922 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 55.094 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 63.479 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 72.257 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 80.775 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 87.718 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 104.854 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 121.390 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 136.810 ms.
Timing FFTs using 5 threads.
[Wed Oct 17 02:55:20 2007]
Best time for 768K FFT length: 12.210 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 20.615 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 22.624 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 26.663 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 31.017 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 34.802 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 38.889 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 55.187 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 64.065 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 72.070 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 79.979 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 87.083 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 103.475 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 120.259 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 135.915 ms.
Timing FFTs using 6 threads.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 11.827 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 20.350 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 22.470 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 26.510 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 30.388 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 34.276 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 38.393 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 55.001 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 62.357 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 70.534 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 78.571 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 85.249 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 101.560 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 117.729 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 132.915 ms.
Timing FFTs using 7 threads.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 11.377 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 20.030 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 22.347 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 26.278 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 30.107 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 33.871 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 37.850 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 53.885 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 61.956 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 70.095 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 77.744 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 84.498 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 100.272 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 116.577 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 131.545 ms.
Timing FFTs using 8 threads.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 11.269 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 19.927 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 22.092 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 25.985 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 29.836 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 33.735 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 37.738 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 53.270 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 61.192 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 68.896 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 77.015 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 83.931 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 99.895 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 115.865 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 130.881 ms.
Best time for 58 bit trial factors: 6.102 ms.
Best time for 59 bit trial factors: 6.116 ms.
Best time for 60 bit trial factors: 6.104 ms.
Best time for 61 bit trial factors: 6.127 ms.
Best time for 62 bit trial factors: 11.402 ms.
Best time for 63 bit trial factors: 11.376 ms.
Best time for 64 bit trial factors: 11.220 ms.
Best time for 65 bit trial factors: 11.166 ms.
Best time for 66 bit trial factors: 11.154 ms.
Best time for 67 bit trial factors: 11.135 ms.
10-17-2007, 02:55 AM
mAJORD

thanks for posting lin,

rough Comparison of !mb windsor K8 @ 3.15Ghz DDR2-800

[Wed Oct 17 20:50:49 2007]
Compare your results to other computers at http://www.mersenne.org/bench.htm
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+
CPU speed: 3149.60 MHz, 2 cores
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, Prefetch, 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 64 KB
L2 cache size: 1024 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 64 bytes
L1 TLBS: 32
L2 TLBS: 512
Prime95 32-bit version 25.5, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 768K FFT length: 23.977 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 28.758 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 32.070 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 40.833 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 49.830 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 60.381 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 67.271 ms.
Compare your results to other computers at http://www.mersenne.org/bench.htm
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+
CPU speed: 3150.12 MHz, 2 cores
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, Prefetch, 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 64 KB
L2 cache size: 1024 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 64 bytes
L1 TLBS: 32
L2 TLBS: 512
Prime95 32-bit version 25.5, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 768K FFT length: 23.929 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 28.854 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 32.007 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 40.859 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 50.156 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 60.028 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 67.450 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 88.718 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 108.427 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 130.906 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 146.278 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 191.597 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 233.971 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 284.569 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 325.225 ms.
Timing FFTs using 2 threads.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 15.164 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 18.115 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 20.450 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 27.264 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 32.885 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 39.207 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 43.853 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 59.363 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 71.331 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 84.593 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 94.509 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 104.298 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 131.939 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 169.880 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 211.001 ms.
Best time for 58 bit trial factors: 3.828 ms.
Best time for 59 bit trial factors: 3.845 ms.
Best time for 60 bit trial factors: 3.853 ms.
Best time for 61 bit trial factors: 3.847 ms.
Best time for 62 bit trial factors: 7.028 ms.
Best time for 63 bit trial factors: 7.048 ms.
Best time for 64 bit trial factors: 8.894 ms.
Best time for 65 bit trial factors: 8.823 ms.
Best time for 66 bit trial factors: 8.844 ms.
Best time for 67 bit trial factors: 8.849 ms.

Wondering why the 1 thread - 2 thread scaling is so poor on my sys, may be the overhead of other apps I had running, anyone else got some K8 results? certainly makes K10 look impresive and in Core 2 league.
10-17-2007, 07:49 AM
Dresdenboy

Quote:

Originally Posted by linhvndiy

This is prime test with supermicro mainboard, cpu df at 1900mhz. I think this main run fastest, mem controller run at 1600mhz instead 1400mhz on tyan. [...]

Thanks for these results! I've expected significantly lower times. Looks like cache architecture is working differently than what Prime95 currently is optimized for (first SSE2 code written for P4, later optimized for other caches and a bit for C2, K8). I'll make a more thorough analysis later.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mAJORD

Wondering why the 1 thread - 2 thread scaling is so poor on my sys, may be the overhead of other apps I had running, anyone else got some K8 results? certainly makes K10 look impresive and in Core 2 league.

Thanks for your numbers too. There are not many results around for K8 > 3 GHz.

Your 2 thread scaling is actually better than Barcelona's for certain FFT sizes - in case of the 1024K FFTs you are closer to 60% time using 2 threads, while linhvndiy's K10 are closer to 70%.

The problem is in the code - Prime95's calculations (special FFT variants) have a lot of serial code compared to parallelizable code. There are diminishing returns when increasing the number of threads as you can see.

Watch this thread, where I also posted linhvndiy's results:
http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=59&page=3

Two Barcelonas at 1.9 GHz behave like a pair of 3 GHz Netburst based 65nm DC Xeons at smaller FFT sizes, but lose at the bigger sizes:
http://mersenneforum.org/showpost.ph...&postcount=284
10-17-2007, 02:35 PM
xPliziT

Here are my Results with a Athlon 64 X2 6400 @ 3500 MHz and CellShock DDR2 1000 @ 4-4-4-12

[Wed Oct 17 18:32:13 2007]
Compare your results to other computers at http://www.mersenne.org/bench.htm
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6400+
CPU speed: 3499.87 MHz, 2 cores
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, Prefetch, 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 64 KB
L2 cache size: 1024 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 64 bytes
L1 TLBS: 32
L2 TLBS: 512
Prime95 32-bit version 25.5, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 768K FFT length: 21.030 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 25.262 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 27.967 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 35.763 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 43.718 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 52.707 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 58.854 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 77.593 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 94.625 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 114.018 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 127.410 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 165.333 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 201.588 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 244.321 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 278.076 ms.
Timing FFTs using 2 threads.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 12.993 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 15.601 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 17.517 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 23.488 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 28.120 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 33.641 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 37.514 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 50.270 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 60.128 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 71.829 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 79.863 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 89.756 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 111.599 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 139.406 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 167.504 ms.
Best time for 58 bit trial factors: 3.403 ms.
Best time for 59 bit trial factors: 3.436 ms.
Best time for 60 bit trial factors: 3.420 ms.
Best time for 61 bit trial factors: 3.436 ms.
Best time for 62 bit trial factors: 6.236 ms.
Best time for 63 bit trial factors: 6.233 ms.
Best time for 64 bit trial factors: 7.895 ms.
Best time for 65 bit trial factors: 7.840 ms.
Best time for 66 bit trial factors: 7.858 ms.
Best time for 67 bit trial factors: 7.845 ms.
10-17-2007, 06:43 PM
linhvndiy

I can't understand why cinebench R10 df clock score is around 11600, but at 2020mhz core is 13400. More than 15% increase but only 7% more clock?
10-17-2007, 07:11 PM
Sparky

Quote:

Originally Posted by linhvndiy

I can't understand why cinebench R10 df clock score is around 11600, but at 2020mhz core is 13400. More than 15% increase but only 7% more clock?

Some good scaling for at least that bench.
10-17-2007, 07:16 PM
informal

Quote:

Originally Posted by linhvndiy

I can't understand why cinebench R10 df clock score is around 11600, but at 2020mhz core is 13400. More than 15% increase but only 7% more clock?

It seems IMC is benefiting from the OCed speed as well,so the latency is lower.
10-17-2007, 07:28 PM
KTE

Quote:

Originally Posted by linhvndiy

I can't understand why cinebench R10 df clock score is around 11600, but at 2020mhz core is 13400. More than 15% increase but only 7% more clock?

We might be able to see a trend if you could just push the clocks higher :stick: :hrhr:
10-17-2007, 07:31 PM
tictac

Quote:

Originally Posted by linhvndiy

I can't understand why cinebench R10 df clock score is around 11600, but at 2020mhz core is 13400. More than 15% increase but only 7% more clock?

What is your highest overclock?
10-18-2007, 03:47 AM
mstp2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by linhvndiy

I can't understand why cinebench R10 df clock score is around 11600, but at 2020mhz core is 13400. More than 15% increase but only 7% more clock?

Didn't someone (I think at AT) post that the IMC runs at different speeds (i.e. ratios) depending on the overall CPU speed?

So it is possible that the IMC just "switched gears" when you went to 2.0GHz.

Kinda like moving to a different strap on C2D overclocking.
10-18-2007, 04:57 AM
mongoled

Quote:

Originally Posted by mstp2009

Didn't someone (I think at AT) post that the IMC runs at different speeds (i.e. ratios) depending on the overall CPU speed?

So it is possible that the IMC just "switched gears" when you went to 2.0GHz.

Kinda like moving to a different strap on C2D overclocking.

Oh no you cant say that....

the stake bring the staaaaaaaaake

:slash:

whos got the matches??

:explode2:

hehehhehehee

interesting findings good that more results are coming in

:up:
10-18-2007, 05:01 AM
linhvndiy

Quote:

Originally Posted by tictac

What is your highest overclock?

about 2030mhz, got restart at 214mhz htt.
I am sure mainboard still have to tweak a lot to fully support barcelona.
10-18-2007, 09:34 PM
Viper666

doesnt work in ASUS KFSN4-DRE 1.7 BA's no post
10-18-2007, 09:36 PM
Viper666

Quote:

Originally Posted by Viper666

LOL Im sure that ASUS made sure it works !

They didnt
10-18-2007, 09:50 PM
PhilDoc

Quote:

Originally Posted by mstp2009

Didn't someone (I think at AT) post that the IMC runs at different speeds (i.e. ratios) depending on the overall CPU speed?

So it is possible that the IMC just "switched gears" when you went to 2.0GHz.

Kinda like moving to a different strap on C2D overclocking.

I think it has more to do with whether the mb has dual power planes or not. Without a split power plane board the MC of a 2350 will run at 1600 mhz. With a dual power plane board the MC will run at 1800 mhz
10-18-2007, 10:17 PM
Viper666

this should post with a quad fx CPU .correct?Anyone got an Idea?ASUS KFSN4-DRE I have nothing else to test it with
10-18-2007, 11:58 PM
Viper666

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dresdenboy

The focus should be moved from "100% scaling" vs. "122% scaling" (surely meant ironically) to something like 60% vs. 80%. Then all people here should be happy ;) As we all know, one type of CPU in a multi CPU setup is hampered more by FSB, inter core traffic and mem BW than another type of CPU with its direct connection links, a cache shared by 4 cores and so on..

Will a car run twice as fast by doubling the number of cylinders?

AMD cars do LMAO
10-19-2007, 07:06 AM
Donster

Ive been away from building pcs for a while now .... how comes theres no 3d benchmark results for barca ?
10-19-2007, 07:35 AM
BeardyMan

Stephen are you ill or so? or on to something? no updates :(?
10-19-2007, 08:11 AM
PhilDoc

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donster

Ive been away from building pcs for a while now .... how comes theres no 3d benchmark results for barca ?

There are some in here, you just have to look through the thread a little. Go back about a week or so. Also, if you go to the news section there's an old thread about 3dmark and the Barcalona
10-19-2007, 12:54 PM
KTE

Intel Tigerton and AMD Barcelona 16-core SPECint_rate 2006 (1) and SPECfp_rate 2006 (2) results:

(1)
Tigerton 2.93GHz (peak/base) 211/184
Barcelona 2.5GHz (peak/base) 188/163

(2)
Tigerton 2.93GHz (peak/base) 113/106
Barcelona 2.5GHz (peak/base) 160/149

Both CPUs unavailable yet.

Latest Zilla Fud
K10 to cost less than Core 2 Quad
Agena FX & X4 from 2.2-2.8GHz 2007 and higher in Q1 08
10-19-2007, 01:01 PM
VulgarHandle

Quote:

Originally Posted by KTE

Intel Tigerton and AMD Barcelona 16-core SPECint_rate 2006 (1) and SPECfp_rate 2006 (2) results:

(1)
Tigerton 2.93GHz (peak/base) 211/184
Barcelona 2.5GHz (peak/base) 188/163

(2)
Tigerton 2.93GHz (peak/base) 113/106
Barcelona 2.5GHz (peak/base) 160/149

Both CPUs unavailable yet.

Latest Zilla Fud
K10 to cost less than Core 2 Quad
Agena FX & X4 from 2.2-2.8GHz 2007 and higher in Q1 08

wow, on par on the integer (based on clock speed), and smashes intel on fp with lower clock (expected of course)
10-19-2007, 01:17 PM
JohannesRS

Nice numbers. Am I wrong or they refer to 4-way systems?

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page