2x1GB/1x1GB OC Database

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

09-23-2005, 12:10 PM
rdgrimes

Looks like I'm going with the G Skill. Best value I can see based on posted results.

BTW, just a friendly hint from an old forum fart. Save your screenies in PNG format, not JPG. Better quality and 1/2 the file size or less.
09-23-2005, 12:15 PM
Major

Try Tref of 3120 with UCCC ;)
09-23-2005, 12:16 PM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by Major

Try Tref of 3120 with UCCC ;)

3120 = 200, 3.9?
09-23-2005, 01:18 PM
ben805

0388= 100mhz(15.6us)
0516= 133mhz(15.6us)
0648= 166mhz(15.6us)
0780= 200mhz(15.6us)
---------------------
0908= 100mhz(7.8us)
1032= 133mhz(7.8us)
1168= 166mhz(7.8us)
0016= 200mhz(7.8us)
---------------------
1536= 100mhz(3.9us)
2048= 133mhz(3.9us)
2560= 166mhz(3.9us)
3072= 200mhz(3.9us)
---------------------
3684= 100mhz(1.95us)
4196= 133mhz(1.95us)
4708= 166mhz(1.95us)
0128= 200mhz(1.95us)
09-23-2005, 01:23 PM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by ben805

0388= 100mhz(15.6us)
0516= 133mhz(15.6us)
0648= 166mhz(15.6us)
0780= 200mhz(15.6us)
---------------------
0908= 100mhz(7.8us)
1032= 133mhz(7.8us)
1168= 166mhz(7.8us)
0016= 200mhz(7.8us)
---------------------
1536= 100mhz(3.9us)
2048= 133mhz(3.9us)
2560= 166mhz(3.9us)
3072= 200mhz(3.9us)
---------------------
3684= 100mhz(1.95us)
4196= 133mhz(1.95us)
4708= 166mhz(1.95us)
0128= 200mhz(1.95us)

Hmmm...I'm pretty sure there is a 3120, but you don't have one listed :confused:
09-23-2005, 01:33 PM
ben805

Quote:

Originally Posted by s7e9h3n

Hmmm...I'm pretty sure there is a 3120, but you don't have one listed :confused:

It is....I just tried it :D
09-23-2005, 01:34 PM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by ben805

It is....I just tried it :D

So what value is it? :p:
09-23-2005, 01:37 PM
ben805

For whatever reason its the same as 200mhz(15.6us)
09-23-2005, 02:43 PM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by ben805

For whatever reason its the same as 200mhz(15.6us)

Thx I knew it was 200, "something" ;) Major, why would you select such a slow Tref?
09-24-2005, 09:51 PM
Major

Quote:

Originally Posted by s7e9h3n

Thx I knew it was 200, "something" ;) Major, why would you select such a slow Tref?

It seems to be the most stable for High OC (atleast for me) with the Samsung UCCC. Not necessarily the fastest bandwidt setting.
09-25-2005, 03:24 AM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by Major

It seems to be the most stable for High OC (atleast for me) with the Samsung UCCC. Not necessarily the fastest bandwidt setting.

You're right about that. But when's the last time you saw me run a "stability test" :p:
09-25-2005, 12:44 PM
ben805

Quote:

Originally Posted by s7e9h3n

You're right about that. But when's the last time you saw me run a "stability test" :p:

try 4708= 166mhz(1.95us) if you're shooting for the highest Bandwidth with decent stability, use Dram drive strength 8 and data 3 along with it.
09-25-2005, 08:13 PM
brandinb

Quote:

Originally Posted by rdgrimes

BTW, just a friendly hint from an old forum fart. Save your screenies in PNG format, not JPG. Better quality and 1/2 the file size or less.

really how does that work??
________
Sativa Strains
09-25-2005, 08:15 PM
EnJoY

PNG's are usually slightly smaller filesize and equal quality to a high quality jpeg. PNG's however are highly incompatible with internet explorer and thus and lot of times won't load. This is coming from a graphics/web designer (me) from my own previous experiences with the formats.
09-25-2005, 08:29 PM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by ben805

try 4708= 166mhz(1.95us) if you're shooting for the highest Bandwidth with decent stability, use Dram drive strength 8 and data 3 along with it.

I already knew that too ;) And use 7/3 when running 3120 :p:
09-25-2005, 10:12 PM
_MyST_Spring

Quote:

Originally Posted by EnJoY

PNG's are usually slightly smaller filesize and equal quality to a high quality jpeg. PNG's however are highly incompatible with internet explorer and thus and lot of times won't load. This is coming from a graphics/web designer (me) from my own previous experiences with the formats.

for light colors, PNG much smaller, but for rich colors image, jpg better.
think most recent web browers support png well now.
09-26-2005, 05:22 AM
rdgrimes

Quote:

PNG's however are highly incompatible with internet explorer and thus and lot of times won't load. This is coming from a graphics/web designer (me) from my own previous experiences with the formats.

Maybe in the last century. ;) We're not talking about photos here, but simple shots of benchmarks, which are perfect for PNG, or even GIF.
Here's an example: JPG medium at 30KB vs PNG at 11 KB. The JPG is the one that looks fuzzy.

http://upload.cdfreaks.com/rdgrimes/Untitled-1.jpg

http://upload.cdfreaks.com/rdgrimes/Untitled-1.png
09-26-2005, 06:02 AM
Nightprowler_77

deleted
09-26-2005, 07:10 AM
RafaDel

2 Attachment(s)

OK here is my contribution to this database... 2x1GB Ballistix PC4000 Z503

2GB takes a lot of time to test, a whole weekend tunning. :toast: Also I would like to thank Major and eva2000 for the many tips I found around here.

http://xtremesystems.org/forums/atta...chmentid=37584

http://xtremesystems.org/forums/atta...chmentid=37585
09-26-2005, 03:26 PM
Major

Nice RafaDel ! :toast:
09-28-2005, 03:14 PM
stealth17

whats the best bios for 2x1gb BE-5 on a DFI nf4? I didnt read the whole thread so please dont shiit on me if its been answered :( sorry if so though
09-28-2005, 07:08 PM
uOpt

Sorry, RafaDel, which 2 GB kit is that?

Your sig only lists other memory.
09-28-2005, 07:20 PM
EnJoY

Quote:

Originally Posted by stealth17

whats the best bios for 2x1gb BE-5 on a DFI nf4? I didnt read the whole thread so please dont shiit on me if its been answered :( sorry if so though

7/04-2 BT/BTA or 6/23-3
09-28-2005, 07:47 PM
stealth17

Quote:

Originally Posted by EnJoY

7/04-2 BT/BTA or 6/23-3

thank you
09-28-2005, 09:00 PM
fareastgq

I prefer 510-2 myself

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page