Printable View
hiya thatguy its still going now whilst i'm typing, now 38 mins now, its weird i had an e8500 and that required low volts but ran hot, and this one is a little hot in my opinion considering its only 1.272 vcore whereas the q750 i had ran cool but required more volts , on a side note i think your more than safe with your ram volts
E8200 (Q745A705) @ 4.2Ghz (1.288v VCore) :up:
http://www.muenster.de/~e30pics/Bild...rime-02_kl.png
The Q750A seem the poorest batch so far. Cant get any stability at 4Ghz with upto 1.45v.Quote:
Originally Posted by GLENBOY
Got a Q746A coming hopefully tomorrow so i hope i get better luck with that
yes i think best batches are q743,745,746 the q750 i had was cool running but needed more voltage than everybody elses to be stable anyway
thats what you call bang for the buckQuote:
Originally Posted by Chri$ch
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chri$ch
It's really good for e8200
I kind of don't want to mess with removing my HS unless absolutely necessary seeing as how things are in a delicate way right now. I will snap some picks when I pull it apart next week. In the mean time, it looks very much like this http://en.expreview.com/?p=142, except without the crud on the CPU.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bail_w
Nice vcore for 4050mhz Glen im glad you found yourself a good one m8 :up:
Sweet chip. Mine is doing similar but only prime stable tested at 9x multi <1.28vcore.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chri$ch
I'm about to switch to 8x and explore top stable clock under 1.3vcore.
Mind if I ask your other voltages - NB/VTT? How about gtl settings for that clock?
NB @ 1.55vQuote:
Originally Posted by mrcape
FSB @ 1.20v
NB / CPU GTL @ auto
Q746A513 E8200s are nothing special... like my Q744A761 E8400 was, 4G @ ~1.36v :rolleyes:
http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/8...rimeyg4wo1.jpg
max fsb on p5k3 deluxe
i hope my Q746A512 E8400 will better... i will got it in a few days...
Is it stable large fft's ? at 525 fsbQuote:
Originally Posted by Chri$ch
they are weird the maximus they don't seem to like high fsb at max clocks i have tried 2 e8400 and an e8500 and they seem to flake out at 510 fsb:(Quote:
Originally Posted by loc.o
I get 9x544.9 fsb on my maximus with my 8400, should do more at lower ratio.Quote:
Originally Posted by GLENBOY
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=303721
Heres a super pi run at 4.3 @ 1.38v (in bios). I think it still needed another small voltage bump, i was getting a few "this program is not responding"
Seems like it wants some vcore anything past 4.1
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...Untitled-2.jpg
these X38 are like needles in a silo :)
some are crap some are good, dunno why, my sucks..
Got it stable at 4,3 now 1.45v, think 2hrs are enough..
4Ghz it will do at 1.25~ will repost more accuratly later.
Http://hem.bredband.net/infan/wolfdale/orthos 4.3.jpg
If you want my opinion, DDR3 is so NOT WORTH IT! :(
have you played with ddr3? i got sloppy timings couse in non benching, i dont need to lower it...
and please do not try to tell me what's worth to me or not, my descission when i bought it.... and im happy with it... clocks well and benches better than ddr2.. so so tired of all people just complaining of the damn ddr3, JUST DONT BUY YOURSELF IT THEN, and those who want to can do it.......so you think all you stuff are nescessery? cmon , cut the crap, this is XS and no whining booth. let peps get what they want! and enjoy their results!
yes its weird i have tried 3 new e series cpus and they all seem to go to 4600 but no more some with lower voltage but after 510fsb they get unstable no matter what volts on nb or cpu
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkjeThe2nd View Post
I have strange VID values too...
EIST enabled VID 1.1125
EIST disabled VID 1.0375
Tested C24 bios as sugestedQuote:
Originally Posted by Chri$ch
EIST enabled VID 1.1125 vcore idle 1.15, vcore load 1.20 (cpu-z)
EIST disabled VID 1.0500 vcore idle 1.13-1.15, vcore load 1.13
Dude, that was a general statement. Not particularly directed at you. Anyway, enjoy!:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Infa
they areQuote:
Originally Posted by Mav451
all sensors readings goes trough the I/O.
Did you ever test it on that evga mb? How did you do?Quote:
Originally Posted by X.T.R.E.M.E_ICE
Latest 333 Strap Orthos + Pink Floyd Testing :)
http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/2800/orthosbu4.jpg
Code:Ratio CMOS Setting : 9
FSB Frequency : 445
FSB Strap to North Bridge : 333
PCI-E Frequency: 100
DRAM Frequency: DDR2-1068
DRAM Command Rate : 2T
DRAM Timing Control: Manual
CAS# Latency : 5
RAS# to CAS# Delay :5
RAS# Precharge : 5
RAS# ActivateTime :15
DRAM Static Read Control: DISABLED
Ai Clock Twister : STRONG
Transaction Booster : DISABLED
BOOST: 0
CPU Voltage : 1.2815 ~ 1.264
CPU PLL Voltage : 1.5 ~ 1.632v
-Many users reporting 1.5 stable.
North Bridge Voltage :1.61 ~ 1.65v
-Needed for 440+ FSB on this Board.
DRAM Voltage : 2.24
FSB Termination Voltage : 1.22v
-Many Users reporting 1.20-1.22v Stable
South Bridge Voltage : 1.05v
Loadline Calibration : ENABLED
CPU GTL Reference : .61x
North Bridge GTL Reference : .63x
DDR2 Channel A REF Voltage : AUTO ~ 1.184
DDR2 Channel B REF Voltage : AUTO ~ 1.184
DDR2 Controller REF Voltage : DDR2
SB 1.5V Voltage : 1.50v
There are some Q750 batches that are good.
Q748 surely sucks. Q746 is best so far at 80%.
Q745 and earlier seems to be the best of all