Kepler Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

03-09-2012, 04:50 PM
cold2010

Rumor: GTX 680 Performance Revealed

http://www.abload.de/img/1cgiaf.jpg

http://chinese.vr-zone.com/11839/nvi...-680-03092012/
http://www.legitreviews.com/news/12590/
03-09-2012, 04:52 PM
GoldenTiger

Quote:

Originally Posted by cold2010

Rumor: GTX 680 Performance Revealed

[*url=http://www.abload.de/image.php?img=1cgiaf.jpg][*img]http://www.abload.de/img/1cgiaf.jpg[/img][/url]

http://chinese.vr-zone.com/11839/nvi...-680-03092012/
http://www.legitreviews.com/news/12590/

Legit sources vr-zone, which sources.... nothing? This is a really old chart just re-made, I think... looks just like one from awhile ago. Thanks for posting, regardless! :)
03-09-2012, 05:05 PM
GoldenTiger

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaddMuppet

That was one of the most important features IMO. I also hope SLI is the same and not limited to just the 2 screens.

Sorry if I was unclear, I meant it won't stick to the limit: as far as I am aware, Kepler will have three-display support on a single card.
03-09-2012, 06:56 PM
MaddMuppet

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldenTiger

Sorry if I was unclear, I meant it won't stick to the limit: as far as I am aware, Kepler will have three-display support on a single card.

I'm pretty sure from what I've heard, that Kepler can do 3 monitors on the one card. I also want Nvidia to have more than 2 monitors with SLI. Other than Surround, SLI is 2 max ATM.
03-09-2012, 08:22 PM
aussie-revhead

Damn so we still wont have a single vid card that can do 120hz in BF3 ...... those BF3 figures dont seem right anyway, I have played on 580 and 7970 and the difference with same settings is larger than 4fps.

:)
03-09-2012, 08:50 PM
MaddMuppet

Quote:

Originally Posted by aussie-revhead

Damn so we still wont have a single vid card that can do 120hz in BF3 ...... those BF3 figures dont seem right anyway, I have played on 580 and 7970 and the difference with same settings is larger than 4fps.

:)

Not at Ultra settings, but there is very little difference between that and high.
03-09-2012, 09:18 PM
aussie-revhead

I beg to differ, my 7970 on ultra was still 10fps higher than my 580 set one notch down from ultra, so had the 580 been on ultra the difference would have been a little greater (tested at 1920x1200 only)

:)
03-09-2012, 09:41 PM
DilTech

Quote:

Originally Posted by aussie-revhead

I beg to differ, my 7970 on ultra was still 10fps higher than my 580 set one notch down from ultra, so had the 580 been on ultra the difference would have been a little greater (tested at 1920x1200 only)

:)

...

http://www.anandtech.com/show/5261/a...7970-review/22

Depends on the location you benchmark at.
03-09-2012, 09:51 PM
STEvil

unless he's talking gameplay average, which although its a seat-of-the-pants measurement, is much more important.

edit - They used single player to benchmark... Yeah, they're trying for repeatability, but lol.
03-09-2012, 10:04 PM
MaddMuppet

Quote:

Originally Posted by aussie-revhead

I beg to differ, my 7970 on ultra was still 10fps higher than my 580 set one notch down from ultra, so had the 580 been on ultra the difference would have been a little greater (tested at 1920x1200 only)

:)

I'm talking about the 120FPS on Ultra settings and a single card. Not the different frame rates between the GTX580 and 7970.
03-10-2012, 12:45 AM
Tim

Quote:

Originally Posted by cold2010

Rumor: GTX 680 Performance Revealed

*snip

http://chinese.vr-zone.com/11839/nvi...-680-03092012/
http://www.legitreviews.com/news/12590/

Those numbers look quite all right. :)
03-10-2012, 12:49 AM
flopper

Quote:

Originally Posted by cold2010

Rumor: GTX 680 Performance Revealed

http://www.abload.de/img/1cgiaf.jpg

http://chinese.vr-zone.com/11839/nvi...-680-03092012/
http://www.legitreviews.com/news/12590/

OC to 1ghz+ also.
345mhz difference from stock.

then it wont cost more than a 580.
03-10-2012, 12:53 AM
Migi06

Quote:

Originally Posted by cold2010

http://www.abload.de/img/1cgiaf.jpg

http://videocardz.com/30564/nvidia-g...mark-leaks-out :rolleyes:
03-10-2012, 01:00 AM
Kuroimaho

I was expecting a bit more this weekend than rediscovering previous fakes.
03-10-2012, 01:04 AM
Olivon

http://tof.canardpc.com/view/44fb364...8068124b78.jpg

http://we.pcinlife.com/thread-1831876-1-1.html

Yeah, 1 month old rumour ...
03-10-2012, 01:21 AM
AffenJack

Can't be, the colours are totally different, i see two independant sources confirming these specs:ROTF:
03-10-2012, 01:23 AM
RPGWiZaRD

^ Probably some1 decided to repost the numbers as they saw the estimate would be very close to the 3DMark numbers haha. I'm so %##&% tired of all these rumors about Kepler, NDA can't end soon enough.
03-10-2012, 01:42 AM
Lanek

Quote:

Originally Posted by Olivon

http://tof.canardpc.com/view/44fb364...8068124b78.jpg

http://we.pcinlife.com/thread-1831876-1-1.html

Yeah, 1 month old rumour ...

Lol i have this screenshoot in my Kepler rumor folder and havent think to look at it..
03-10-2012, 02:07 AM
DilTech

Quote:

Originally Posted by STEvil

unless he's talking gameplay average, which although its a seat-of-the-pants measurement, is much more important.

edit - They used single player to benchmark... Yeah, they're trying for repeatability, but lol.

I know that... I'm just pointing out that the small gap between the 7970 and 580 is repeatable by proven testing.
03-10-2012, 03:15 AM
N19h7m4r3

I don't think anyone noticed this from Nvidia yet.

So here's my post from OCUK

Have a look here lads.

The Samaritan demo use to take 3 GTX 580's to run before, Nvidia are claiming they managed it now with a Single Kepler card

http://www.geforce.com/News/articles...dia-kepler-gpu
03-10-2012, 03:18 AM
Olivon

You're late to the party dude :p:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post5064954
03-10-2012, 03:20 AM
N19h7m4r3

Threads move so fast when Kepler is involved haha :p:
03-10-2012, 05:26 AM
Lanek

some hint

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Baumann

Timing.

Although there was a relatively short time period between the releases of the chips, Verde and Pitcairn's bring-up, and to some extent qualification, have a reasonable level of leveraging going on so they are a little shortended in terms of initial engineering wafers back to product shipping. Actually setting the product "boundries" for Tahiti happened a while ago, on initial engineering material and few wafers out from the fab; Pitcairn and Verde on the other hand had their product boundries set when Tahiti production starts were already occuring and there is a very quick evolution in terms of understanding things with the new process / chips.

I guess the question you want to ask is whether, now that we know things have evolved, are we going back to re-look at Tahiti....
03-10-2012, 05:45 AM
GoldenTiger

Quote:

Originally Posted by RPGWiZaRD

^ Probably some1 decided to repost the numbers as they saw the estimate would be very close to the 3DMark numbers haha. I'm so %##&% tired of all these rumors about Kepler, NDA can't end soon enough.

Yeah, I posted right when I saw it because I recognized the so called data last night.

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post5066270
03-10-2012, 05:56 AM
Lanek

And in 1-2 month from early ES, alpha driver, test samples, just right out of TSMC, the nuimber will not have move an hair... I was think VR is more serious ..

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page