Yeah, dunno if I got time to pee even :stick: :toast: I think I should get rewarded with a Conroe from coolaler because he make me work every morning when I get up :PQuote:
Originally Posted by dogsx2
Keep up the good work my friends!
Printable View
Yeah, dunno if I got time to pee even :stick: :toast: I think I should get rewarded with a Conroe from coolaler because he make me work every morning when I get up :PQuote:
Originally Posted by dogsx2
Keep up the good work my friends!
thank you very much Dude:toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by NiCKE^
Couldn't you try with ~500 4-3-2-1 ?? Shouldn't it be faster ?? :D :slobber:
NiCKE^ can we get some of the other chips updated because I thought I had the opty 150 wr but didnt there are also a few others I am unsure of
Cheers:toast:
Sure write the WR's and I update fatty.
Is that validated?
I still see Kingpin in #1 ;)
IMO this is NOT a WR.
just because of a valid ?
so => lol
an overclock is an overclock , valid or no
Validation is a nonsense, it could be faked without any problem.
A lot of WR are not cpu-z validated ( cf 1st post ) so could you explain why it wouldn`t be a WR ?
Moreover : http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=94127
Imo, your opinion does not matter :D
All french army over me :clap: :clap: :clap:
http://valid.x86-secret.com/search.php
Look for FX57 and tell me who's the first one. Screenshot could easily be a fake, but not a CPU-Z validation.
Do you really think so he has done a fake for 30mhz ;) ?
Nope, I didn't say that.
I just said that probably he wasn't able to validate at higher speed than kingpin.
You should read his thread, he will do that very soon, it's only a matter of time :p :)
Even if it wouldn't be better than kingpin's o/c ( because of a possible difference between F5 and F7 ), It still be the highest frenquency reached on AMD CPU, if it's note a fake, and it's not a fake ;)
Stop argue about it it's just a crappy AMD ;)
eheh thank you mate :)Quote:
@NiCKE^: Thank you for adding me. May I suggest you to add *OCM* just after my nickname? My bad, I haven't writing anything while posting the picture. I apologies! ;)
@Fixxxer: Your're right, Skirms & Quent are friends of mine... BTW I would have written the same if my worst enemy has said that already. Just check this linky:
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=93444
I think that no more word are needed after seeing this fake. The truth is that it doesn't exit a safe / anti-cheat way. Don't be wrong, I don't tell that I know how to make a faked .cvf, but I just want to show you that it wouldn't be so hard to do one.
However, be sure that I would have prefer to get a bloody validation file instead of this picture and I'll continue trying to get one...
R1150 might be great to validate higher; hehe skirms, I need you my friend :D
If you feel a reply is needed, please drop me a PM... ;)
@My fellow OCM Team members: Thx for your support guys! :D
Whats going on here?
Fixxer, the Link you've posted is crappy as hell (the whole validation DB doesn't work right I guess). Let me explain why=
a) look at the picture here and read the active URL down in the status bar
http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/515/fixxer4ap.th.jpg
b) now goto this validation and tell me where the 4Ghz+ are gone?
----------------------------
Nicke, can you correct some positions of 2 entries in the section Intel-OC? I mean, at Overall there is
Overall: Pentium 670 duck - 7638.6 MHz
ok, let's scroll down to the fastest 670 and we'll see this
670: duck - 7657.6 MHz -so THIS should be the overall record.
---------------------------
before, your link is showing an edited CVF file. Like all will agree with me, cheating with the validation process is still possible. But hey where is the problem?
Most of you are on these forums for a long time and experienced a lot while watching others overclocking their rigs or just overclock your own... I mean, a lot do know whats a realistic result and whats not.
An Opteron @7,7Ghz...jealousy is everywhere.
Please do excuse some grammar mistakes, I just woke up.
ouch....
Please coolaler I've to ask you too to write name - time link. It's way much easier for me. I will ipdate it anyway.
Thanks
Woah. That's 4 secords off the record in 2 weeks ? Amazing at what the chips can do !
3D01 @ FUGGER
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8980189
this is insane
OHHH CRAP.... yesterday I remember the record to be 12.9xx and now its 11.9xx. Coolaler, you really did an amazing job. :clap: :clap: :clap:
So what volts are you running?
I also see that you benched SP 1m-32m using the same speed, that means there must me even more room for SP 1m... Hehe, you have another WR hidden somewhere dont you.:slobber: :slobber: :slobber:
4.26Ghz amazing! What does this run with both cores??!! LOL, I get the feeling a lot of 3d records are going to fall. :woot: :woot: :woot:
All the records are in the midst of falling with Conroe :banana:Quote:
Originally Posted by BeyondSciFi