athlon64 overclock record. all owners please post

so 2270 for 36s

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/36s..JPG
45s at 1784MHz
274.5*6.5/7 = 254.9

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/45s.JPG

Quote:

---

Originally posted by andyddr
A little unfair IMO. Fx53 has higher mem timings and lower FSB. Obvious that it would come second. But the fact that it still beats 3200+ in some tests show`s it`s a better chip.

---

i'm not agree with you , okay the 3200+ got 260 Fsb but the memory bandwith is very lower than FX.

In fact , the things you should understand on this graphic are :
-Dual channel is not indispensable pifast excluded (A64 soon ddr500 stock)
-Ecc is very bad.

Wow 36s at only 2.27G. That is the standard A6 not FX right?

what cpu's are those for the 36s and 45s run?

yes cpull use 3400+ 1Mo L2

Man I just realised that I hadnt put my 3400+ scoresz in this thread :p:

Here's some pifast
http://users.tpg.com.au/spark69/an50r/pifast42.23.jpg

and some SuperPi. I didnt push SuperPi any further as the score aint gonna get any better until I cross the 2970 barrier.
http://users.tpg.com.au/spark69/an50r/superpi30.jpg

and a max (very unstable) screenie
http://users.tpg.com.au/spark69/an50r/cpuz3060.jpg

Also does 3dmark up to 2947, and sandra crapola up to 2970

fine codered !!
i want to congratulate you for your ti4600 3Dmark performance , i tried to beat you with my Fx53 , but i just broke my nose :D.
your ti must be very optimised ;)

misteroadster I see your point now. But still 60FSB is quite a bit of bandwidth.

yes , i think A64+ 1Mo L2 needs 4000 in sandra mem bandwith to be most powerfull than FX53 at same frequency , after it's just a question of final frequency.
At 240X10 5/3/3/3 i got the same score 3Dm2001 than FX53 at 200X12 5/2/3/2

Quote:

---

Originally posted by misteroadster
fine codered !!
i want to congratulate you for your ti4600 3Dmark performance , i tried to beat you with my Fx53 , but i just broke my nose :D.
your ti must be very optimised ;)

---

Thanks man.

Yeah, my drivers and settings are quite tweaked. What GPU/mem clocks were you using for that 20600 run? My guess is 350/750 based on your nature score, is that close?

Firstly try win2k + DX 8.1 + 42.51 drivers
order the tests as follows
Lobby low
Car High
Lobby High
Drag Low
Drag High
Nature
Car Low (repeat as often as necessary)

LOD=3.6 for lobby and 4.1 for the rest

yes , i forgot my settings , there was about 350/750 yes , in fact i had to confess that i concentrate on 9700pro title.
I ve modded my 4800 in 1 hour , put it in my chiller , and runned 3Dmark.
But i ll come back man :)
Thanks a lot for your advices. ;)

my mini 35s on 3200+ K8Npro BH-5 KHX3200 2X256 only 3,34vddr
i want to freeze my ram and increase vio.
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/mini35s.JPG

What do you think about that ?
it explain that coeff 4 go higher than the others.
Latency are increased at coeff X4
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/Mbenchtest.JPG

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Ravilj
what cpu's are those for the 36s and 45s run?

---

a 3400+, and 2811MHz with 1.8v, I can see 3GHzhttp://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/350.JPG

Quote:

---

Originally posted by CodeRed
Man I just realised that I hadnt put my 3400+ scoresz in this thread :p:

Here's some pifast
http://users.tpg.com.au/spark69/an50r/pifast42.23.jpg

and some SuperPi. I didnt push SuperPi any further as the score aint gonna get any better until I cross the 2970 barrier.
http://users.tpg.com.au/spark69/an50r/superpi30.jpg

and a max (very unstable) screenie
http://users.tpg.com.au/spark69/an50r/cpuz3060.jpg

Also does 3dmark up to 2947, and sandra crapola up to 2970

---

:slobber: m8, thats goooood, damn good numbers.

maybe 1.9 was to tiny for my processor to get past 2802 mhz:/

:toast:

Woho :) im over 25k in 3dmark01 now..
But my nature is veery low, I dont know why..
I used nForce 2.45 and Catalyst 3.5..

2460mhz 273*9 1:1 Gigabyte K8N vcore mod and vmem
Radeon 9800 PRO 500/371 Only VGPU mod
KHX PC3000 2.5-2-2-5-10-16

http://home.no.net/geek:banana::bana.../asd/25160.bmp

what did you do to have 273 1:1 with ur PC3000 and K8N Pro?
it's about the IRQs?

Radeon 9800 PRO 500/471 Only VGPU mod

OMW 471 on the mem on a 9800PRO!!!!

Sorry off topic but that is really impressive Orak.

i compare FX53 and 3200+ Overclocked to the max :
http://www.think-hardware.com/articl...=43&page=page1

Quote:

---

Originally posted by andyddr
Radeon 9800 PRO 500/471 Only VGPU mod

OMW 471 on the mem on a 9800PRO!!!!

Sorry off topic but that is really impressive Orak.

---

471 without any kinda mods...hmm he just propably wright it down wrong, 371 i buy it, but not 471 with out any mods @ all.

And 158 in Nature, its already done, no 471 there;)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Orak
Woho :) im over 25k in 3dmark01 now..
But my nature is veery low, I dont know why..
I used nForce 2.45 and Catalyst 3.5..

2460mhz 273*9 1:1 Gigabyte K8N vcore mod and vmem
Radeon 9800 PRO 500/471 Only VGPU mod
KHX PC3000 2.5-2-2-5-10-16

*snip*

---

You must mean 371 MHz on the mem...

Hehe, sorry boys, its 371 on the Radeon mem.. :(

and for my question?

Quote:

---

Originally posted by cpulloverclock
what did you do to have 273 1:1 with ur PC3000 and K8N Pro?
it's about the IRQs?

---

K8N -non pro, but anyway.. 3.7v at the ram.. and cl2.5.. thats the trick

CodeRed, what cooling on that 3400+

Quote:

---

Originally posted by EmineM
CodeRed, what cooling on that 3400+

---

R404a modded prommy

Its a good chip I think, now I just need some memory to match :)