I will give that a try. Thanks. I just have a gut feeling that these sticks are what is holding my 965 back...
Printable View
I will give that a try. Thanks. I just have a gut feeling that these sticks are what is holding my 965 back...
I am having a problem with this. You are saying that 4 / (9/8) = 1.777. But that is wrong. It would have to be 2 / (9/8) for the resulting quotient of 1.777. 4 / (9/8) is 3.555.
Am I just missing something here or is there an error in your math? Either way please let me know because I am very confused.
got my system up and running on friday
http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/5938/nhmzl5.jpg
i know this part can go a lot higher even on air cooling (i am using a Noctua NH-U12P SE1366) but 4ghz is plenty for me. parts from this batch have hit 5ghz on air at 1.48V. my room is getting warm as i type this lol. :flame:
also im not done lowering the voltage yet. at 1V this part rates 3.6ghz, having internal data helps. :D
so i figure 4ghz with safety + droop is 1.1V or so. ill have more time this weekend to tweak it.
What is all this talk about the Intel INF utility? Should we be checking it out or what?
This is one of the benchmark results in the CPU3D.com review of the P6T running at 4GHz. :rofl:
http://chuckbam.com/i7_P6T-D/1-CPU3D_4GHz.PNG
This is me with a cheap DDR3 Ver. of an HD 3870
http://chuckbam.com/i7_P6T-D/1-PCMARK05.PNG
.
My 24/7 so far ,temps are good and needs less volts than 21 x 200. Still working on that with lower volts. These Gskill PI blacks are sweet.
About my previous message, I can confirm I had not disabled C1E in bios. When I do, both Cpu-z and RealTemp show fixed frequency. When I don't, only Cpu-z shows (wrongly) fixed frequency.
Interesting, and sweet RAM speed. Are those rated 1800 8,8,8 or just OCed? Edit...just saw they are 1600, very impressive for running 12Gb ram:clap: Glad to see that, I was starting to think when I upgrade to windows 7 + more than my 3gb ram, my OC was going to get hosed...but maybe not. How much DRAM volts and QPI/Vtt are u using?
I am using 21x200 now for 24/7, need to check 183x23:D. I thought at 4.1 I needed about same or maybe 1 less notch with 21 multi, have not checked 183x23 yet...though mine may be different. But definitely both way better than using 22 multi.
so as far as I can tell, i965 and i940 are pretty much a waste of $$
EDIT: For air and water atleast
Doesn't the 920 top out @ 20x multi? I doubt i could get my 23x perma-turbo multi on a 920 :shrug:
Anyone else getting really random vdroop? Setting 1.44v in bios gives me 1.424v in cpu-z under load, setting 1.46v in bios gives the same. Setting 1.475v in bios gives 1.456v real @ idle, 1.44v under load. Still that means i've nailed 185x23 =4.25ghz 10hr prime stable with 1.44v, which is not bad i guess. Now going for 4.3ghz with 23x187.
Does anyone know why running four instances of Orthos is only putting my loads at 100%, 100%, 50%, and 50%?
I concur...
I went and returned my 965 and exchanged it for a 920.
My max stable oc on the 965 was 4.3 and guess what my max stable oc on the 920 is... Give up?
4.3 :D
Guess for me the 965 was just a waste of money since I can do the exact same thing with my 920. With the exact same volts by the way.
All I know is 4.3 for $320 is WAY better than 4.3 for $1150. Seriously
And my ram, qpi and uncore speeds are almost identical to what they were on my 965 4.3 overclock.
So lost 200 pts on everest read, write and copy but I put $700 back in my pocket...
no brainer, huh?
Anyway, it's funny how context is so important. I was really dissapointed in a 4.3 clock on the 965 but I'm thrilled with the same clock on the 920
lol sonofander :ROTF: , 4.3 , ht on ? turbo on ?