27s in SuperPi 1M Test
P4 3,4E @ 4634; P4C800-E; 2x512MB OCZ EB 3500 @ 272.6 @ 3-2-2-8
http://www.forumdeluxx.de/gallery/da...4927Screen.JPG
All I've done is the droop and vdimm mod. 1024MB 272.6mhz is nice on i875P, right?
Vcore 1.6V, Vdimm 3.4V
Printable View
27s in SuperPi 1M Test
P4 3,4E @ 4634; P4C800-E; 2x512MB OCZ EB 3500 @ 272.6 @ 3-2-2-8
http://www.forumdeluxx.de/gallery/da...4927Screen.JPG
All I've done is the droop and vdimm mod. 1024MB 272.6mhz is nice on i875P, right?
Vcore 1.6V, Vdimm 3.4V
Not bad :D ... but - dead link!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by xsky
fixed it ;)
very impressive :toast:
Dual channel? Wow. That rocks, my German fellow :thumbsup:
thanks a lot :)
yes it's DC with PAT and PAM enabled
it was cooled by stock LS (if I didn't mention before)
Quote:
Originally Posted by xsky
You did not mention it ;)
"stock" LS you gotta love this place =) Myself i get 35 secs in a moderately OCed barebon thats supersilent.
now warming up for 32M Test with good old Kingston BH-5.
starting with 1.45V Vcore and 3.4V Vdimm
http://www.forumdeluxx.de/gallery/da.../944924_46.JPG
Hello Im new here, and this my one
P4 2.8c @ 3.36 (240*14, 1:1)
Abit ic7
twinmos 400mhz 256mb *2 2.5-3-3-8
http://s03.imagehost.org/0070/SuperPI-40s.jpg
Welcome to the madness Andrew :)
Nice start. Are you sure you cant push the cpu any further and eventually running with a divider?
TNX,Quote:
Originally Posted by bias_hjorth
240mhz x 14 (CPU:Mem 1:1) its high level of my P4 2.8c D1 :\ bad cpu for OC
I cannot boot my comp at 240mhz with ratio 5:4 ;( (i think the problem with CPU and not with memory )
Nett, my friend! ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by xsky
Get it on... :D
Thx!
Here my first sub 24min bench:
P4E 3.4 DO @ 4511.6MHz
P4C800E-Deluxe
2*256MB Kingston HyperX 3200 @ 265.4MHz 2-2-2-5
http://maitre.physik.uni-kl.de/~mkrauss/23.58.JPG
Nice, how you do 1mb ?Quote:
Originally Posted by xsky
my result should be some posts before
27s
http://maitre.physik.uni-kl.de/~mkrauss/27Screen.JPG
this is done with 2*512MB OCZ EB 3500
niceQuote:
Originally Posted by xsky
I activated the pat on my P4P800SE and FSB250 stable now because the dram latency is at 101 , before it was 215
a little comparison with the pat disabled and dram latency at 111...
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclo...atdisabled.gif
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclo...patenabled.gif
P4 3.4E S478, wcooled, 1.45v in full, but u have to look at the Pat enabled at this fsb with the P4P800-SE :D
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/31s.gif
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/5m47s.gif
Hmm, cpu, no differences to spot there besides the pat thingy ;) :D
/edit. first post, I mean :D
yep, pat disabled + dram latency at 111 VS pat enabled + dram latency at 101 = same perf in superpi 104... elsewhere I dont knowQuote:
Originally Posted by SAE
Aaahhhh... now I understood. You wanted to show that the dram latency makes up for missing PAT!?Quote:
Originally Posted by cpulloverclock
Kewl :D
yes exactly :DQuote:
Originally Posted by SAE
Dunno how legit this patch is that updates FISTTP instructions for prescott:
http://www.vr-zone.com.sg/Shamino/AS8/patch.JPG
www.vr-zone.com.sg/Shamino/AS8/pipatch.zip
But it gave me a 23 second result:
http://www.vr-zone.com.sg/Shamino/AS8/23sec.JPG
Think it shaves off 2secs for the scotties
I test it at 4077MHz