Not quite sure. As for temp evap temp around dual prime above mentioned is about -43c... Bit colder than standard mach II gt or Vapo LS obviously.Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
Printable View
Not quite sure. As for temp evap temp around dual prime above mentioned is about -43c... Bit colder than standard mach II gt or Vapo LS obviously.Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
170 CCBWE 0536MPMW 2x2600Mhz 1,392 Vcore Dualprime 24.14 Custom FFts in Place. 8-4096. Ambient 18-20°C.
http://www.bilder-hosting.de/uploads/8fa785d9e1.jpg
great chip!
I've got a lot of burning in to do on my 175, there's like a 200mhz stability difference between cores... core 1 can OC way higher with less volts while core 0 needs high volts just to make it to 2.6ghz...
Nice X2 4800+ there but it's like twice the price of opteron 170 here in OZ hehe
Yeah my 2nd 170 has an exceptional cpu0 core but lazy cpu1 core so doing a long burn in run
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...nK7_cpu1_1.jpg
Where did you get it?Quote:
Originally Posted by LucusScott
Is it really a 4800+?
I only know one thing, I will never go single core again.......http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8830106
In general, have the 170's or the 165's been clocking better? I have been eyeing a 165 from zipzoomfly or a 170 for mwave for about a week and I am very torn between the two. Any suggestions?
I just bought a 180 so I'm not anti-dc however your video card makes more of a difference then MHz or dc ever will when it comes to 3d. Yes, I know the dc drivers are alot better now but video cards rule.Quote:
Originally Posted by RacerX
My video OC is not nearly has high as most that has hit 40K, obviously anyone can tell by my nature score. Call it what ever you want but my system is twice as responsive with my 175 at 10x280 compared to my 148 10x305. Oh by the way almost 41K without touching video card...........http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8830556Quote:
Originally Posted by dogsx2
Me one happy dc convert.:banana:
ARE NATURE SCENES CPU DEPENDANT OR GFX DEPENDANTQuote:
Originally Posted by RacerX
GFX mainly for 3d2k1
yehQuote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
how do you explain this issue i have http://www.i4memory.com/showthread.p...1098#post31098
hey dinos, I have the same thing. I think there is something we don't know. Here is a ss of mine and eva2000 in 01.Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8788189
you mean the last one with lower clocked card but higher clocked cpu ? while GFX helps with Nature so does FSB and cpu clock speed that and he's using different drivers which can affect the testsQuote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
i only see eva's test...........you should take a screenshot insteadQuote:
Originally Posted by dogsx2
hey eva have a lookQuote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
we are talking single core 2.8GHz against Dual Core Opteron at 2737MHz with Optimised Dual Core Drivers and same GFX clocks........yet i get pumped bad
http://img459.imageshack.us/img459/2679/orb60xn.jpg
Why is his FSB only 38MHz ??
Also is 2K a little faster ???
Opteron 170 0543TPMW @ 2.7, 1.52v, xp90c
http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/233/cpu8ak.th.jpg
Haven't tested any higher yet
Another Update on my 0546SPMW. I started to suspect that heat was hindering the OC on my chip. So I opened the side panel and replaced my Medium Speed Panaflow 92mm on my XP-90 with a Tornado. Lowered my CPU temps arouynd 7c , PWMIC temps around 5c and Chipset temps around 7c.
With this I got the chip at 1.520 to 2738Mhz Dual Small FFT prime stable. Not going to leave it like this, however I am going to move to water cooling now. Probally can squeeze 2800 out of this chip :)
yeah win2k is faster for 3dmark2001 than winxp hehQuote:
Originally Posted by alpha0ne
time for some 3dmarking with Opteron 170 0546SPMW :D
@2750mhz at 1.552v
10x 275HTT 3-3-2-8 8-18-2223 at 2.64v vdimm
with 2GB OCZ PC4000EB
@621/747 Stock 512MB HIS X1800XT speeds
3dmark05 = 9,359
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1579000
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...47_9359_tn.jpg
3dmark2003 = 18,060
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4483955
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...7_18060_tn.jpg
3dmark2001 = 37,777
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8830657
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...7_37777_tn.jpg
Pcmark05 = 7,074
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=210257
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...05_7074_tn.jpg
.
are the overclocks that people are getting going down? I was really bumed out with my opty 165 0534 because it only did 2700 while the 0530 did 2900+
outside of the 0530, what is the next best? Anything new come out lately that has clocked well?
People that had that stepping 0534 on the 165 where getting near 2900.
On my 170 with 0534 stepping I could barely do 2750.
165 is little better on that stepping from what i've seen here.
How much voltage are you using?
Sorry about that, never crossed my mind that it would only work for me. He is a ss.Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
http://img371.imageshack.us/img371/2729/01sss2xi.th.jpg
what's your card clocked at ?Quote:
Originally Posted by dogsx2