I think these do :D
Some results that luihed got :eek:
http://www3.telus.net/luis99/292
:eek:
http://www3.telus.net/luis99/335c
Printable View
I think these do :D
Some results that luihed got :eek:
http://www3.telus.net/luis99/292
:eek:
http://www3.telus.net/luis99/335c
Bennah 335MHz? you mean that's 670MHz DDR? or it's photoshop?
If that is`nt a Photoshop job then it`s the best BH5/6 I`ve ever seen. What system was this on and is that a buffered or unbuffered score?
PiZza we think alike (u just type faster than me) :)
andyddr My split keyboard helps me a lot doing that. :)
Now my Super_Pi is on 36 sec. - It's good with some faster RAM :)
http://keza.port5.com/Super_pi!.JPG
K32A Not bad. Increase VCore. You'll get higher clocks.
I got 35 sec. It's maximum on air.
2PiZza I can't increase the vcore with out a mod. And i'm sending the motherboard in to get it fixed at the place where I bought it. There's some small problems when i update windows... What do tou think my RAM can run at 2.9v ? And with what cas.?
with my second 3400+ I get 2460MHz rock stable at 1.4v
it is worst than the first
Is that bad :| At 1.4vcore?
K32A It's nice. pretty nice.
yes and 2700 at 1.63vQuote:
Originally posted by K32A
Is that bad :| At 1.4vcore?
cpulloverclock Someday I gonna change may 3200+ on 3400+ or 3700+ or whatever.
Update. Got 2580 at 1.92. Screenshot stable. :)
Yea it is not a PS job. Its a real result that he got.Quote:
Originally posted by 2PiZzA
Bennah 335MHz? you mean that's 670MHz DDR? or it's photoshop?
But using the A64 meant that it was'nt a real 335MHz, its a little lower I think.
macci posted somewhere on these forums, showing how you can work it out, but I cant find it now :(
I think his rig was
A64 3200+ (waterchilled)
AN50R
KHX3200
Pretty decent isnt it :)
Anyway, you're all using nforce3 and i'm using k8t800. THat's a big difference. So there're no problems with fake clocks.
Quote:
Originally posted by 2PiZzA
1.9v is not a problem. Gonna vmod mobo for higher vcore.
It's realy printscreen stable. But if you look at http://www.vr-zone.com/ocdb/search.php , my a64 is the fastest 3200+ with air cooling. With the highest FSB and memclk.
but 2464MHz = 260x9.5 @ 1.8VDC is absolutely stable. With 2-2-2-5 mem timings in synchro.
nono, your memory runs with 260 / 10 * 9.5 = 247MHz :toast:
SKYNET This works on Nforce3. I've just tried 257*10 - no problems. But my CPU cannot work at higher frequncies.
So it's definately not 'bout me.
So thats how ya work out the mem speed :)Quote:
Originally posted by SKYNET
nono, your memory runs with 260 / 10 * 9.5 = 247MHz :toast:
FSB / 10 x Multi = Mem Speed :)
:toast:
I got my garden hose directly connected to my watercooling now :D results later :)
this is the lowest frequency for 37s with my K8n pro
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/37s...JPG
it's promising cpull ;)
this is my best Superpi 1M with my 0338 UPMW 3200+ and BH-5 KHX3200
K8Npro Vcore moded , mod Vio=Vddr 3,36V
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/31s.JPG
I was testing FX53 Vs 3200+ for a french site.
The test will be online monday :
www.think-hardware.com
As you'll can see a 3200+ at 260X10 is most powerfull than FX53 overclocked to 13X200.
Very interresting , do you know ? don't forget the 3200's bandwith is very lower at 260FSb 1:1 than FX at 200.
For PC mark2004 i think my windows was crashed.
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadste...00-2600mhz.JPG
what bios did you use ?Quote:
Originally posted by cpulloverclock
this is the lowest frequency for 37s with my K8n pro
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/37s...JPG
A little unfair IMO. Fx53 has higher mem timings and lower FSB. Obvious that it would come second. But the fact that it still beats 3200+ in some tests show`s it`s a better chip.Quote:
Originally posted by misteroadster
I was testing FX53 Vs 3200+ for a french site.
The test will be online monday :
www.think-hardware.com
As you'll can see a 3200+ at 260X10 is most powerfull than FX53 overclocked to 13X200.
Very interresting , do you know ?
For PC mark2004 i think my windows was crashed.
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadste...00-2600mhz.JPG
F11 in 16-7-2-2-5-2-2-1-3 I believeQuote:
Originally posted by Orak
what bios did you use ?
I can get 36s at 2280-2288MHZ with a better fsb
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/36s.JPG