thanks for the comparison
Printable View
thanks for the comparison
Quote:
Originally Posted by wa77ss
I put my money on Conroe. Any takers? :D
No contest. Everything has shown Conroe to have better IPC than Yonah ;)
and a real benchmark? one, at least
I think Conroe would beat a Yonah for sure .... but I would just like to see a percentage of performance increase like they did with the FX-57/Opteron 170
OMG so Nice Charles!!!...missed this. Thats crazy air power!Quote:
Originally Posted by FUGGER
Is it too hard to post worthwhile benchmarks instead bs 3d whatever or super pi?
Is it too hard to post something constructive or positive? All the tests they have done are very universal and I like to be able to compare my computer to Conroe. Furthermore, I appreciate anything they can give us (no other site has provided information like this about these chips), and I'm sure more will come.Quote:
Originally Posted by bateslabel
what would be a "worthwhile benchmark"?
Here ya go:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=98091
That is as real an application as it gets. I don't think anyone else can get 165FPS average in Half Life 2: Lost Coast timedemo unless they also own a Conroe chip.
Here's my shot at giving an apples to apples comparison. It would seem some of the A64 benches posted aren't running tight timmings.
http://members.cox.net/gtabor1/2.7.JPG
I dont get it.
I got this results:
8135 pts
Test 1= 3.7
Test 2= 8.1
Running a opteron 165 at 3006mhz (mem at 250).
How come you beat my 3ghz opteron in game 1 and I beat you in test 2 when your cpu was at 2.6? Is memory bandwidth that important for 3dmark cpu test? What am I doing wrong in here?
if u dont know then dont mind but the cpu test on 05 is bugt ass hell .
we @ belgim tested , get evry time some sort of other score , some time it can change with even a 1000punts ;) .
so plz dont use the 05 cpu tests as good compare
Very nice work guys very nice indeed!Quote:
Originally Posted by freecableguy