oh $hit )
i confused the 05 and 06 results haha )))
Printable View
oh $hit )
i confused the 05 and 06 results haha )))
Hehe :banana::banana::banana::banana: happens :)
Are there any good mobos for this chip or any comming out soon? Link plz.
AOpens is quite well known, I dont know if NDA has been lifted though, I wont post a thing... - But yes, there's a few..Quote:
Originally Posted by CrashOv3r1De
No because thats thats the mhz of the OC not the % so it means nothing. Imagine if you overclocked a pentium D 800 Mhz above stock. Pretty crappy overclock ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Willis
Ok I just did the math, yonah OCd 35.55% over stock, FX-60 29.96%... Damn yonah on air clocks better then an FX-60 on phase (or whatever... I think it was phase)
To be exact....the 60 was running @ 15X225 and 1.55 vcore under single stage @-25C cpu core temp......at that time.Quote:
Originally Posted by stbarlet
So who is actually picking one of these bad boys up?
The Aopen mobo......Most etailer/stores in Japan will have it available on the second week of March....which hopefully @ the same time here.
T2600......ZZF available retail box.
Has anybody claimed that 64bit architecture is twice as fast as 32bit? If not I think that even mentioning that is bull is bull. The main reason to buy a 64bit cpu today is that it supports 4GB++ of RAM. It would be handy in a workstation.. But who buys a laptop to get a respectable workstation?Quote:
Originally Posted by M.Beier
My main point is; 32bit vs 64bit has not much to do with raw performance.
I think I will be getting one, this rocks my socks. Wonder what magic it will do under that modded Vapo once chilly finishes it (this week i hope)
700€ in Spain
http://webshop.alternate.es/html/sho...ndorSelect=44&
269€ the T2300.
Actually in certain apps 64bit = 0-500% increase in performance. I unfortunatly don't use this particular package but I do use a 64 bit renderer and it does make a quite a nice difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by M.Beier
http://www.planetx64.com/index.php?o...id=5&Itemid=52
64 bit is not all fluff..
i got all excited thinking you use video encoding/editing friendly 64-bit appQuote:
Originally Posted by Wrench
i want this cpu bad!!! DROOOL
Even though Yonah's latency has increased the performance per clock is still better than Dothan. Especially encoding have been improved... i made a comparission of Anandtechs 2nd early preview of Yonah (yes, using bad chipset and low performance DDR2, but all does - it's comparable).
In encoding Dothan generally performs 40% less than Yonah...
See my post here
But unfortunately I don't think that there will be any good Yonah motherboards, because of the upcoming Conroe with less than 3 months to release and on the paper it's a lot better than Yonah (targeted high-end and not mobile market).
See the Aopen 975X - it has MAX FSB of 266MHz. 13x266=3466MHz... the other motherboards are 945GT based mATX...
Not just Intel building Yonah boards atm.
What PLL chip on the Aopen 975 board? Franck might have something done for this already.
In the thread of Hardwareluxx they mention "Rtm865-461" - seems like some Realtek PLL. I'm not good at german, but it seems they unsuccesfully tried a SetFSB for "RTM865-433" (meant for Aopen 915GM).Quote:
Originally Posted by FUGGER
Look in post #81, #82 and #84
Link: http://www.forumdeluxx.de/forum/show...=209283&page=3
Vcore: ISL6262Quote:
Originally Posted by FUGGER
Vdimm: ISL6537
PLL: RTM865-461
Ciao
What about waiting for Conroe tests before analysing how good it is??? - It properly wont have the same overclocking protential, nor will 1 mhz be as fast as yonah... (does it have 13 cycle?)
It will have a higher FSB, which increases the performance alot, but TIME WILL SHOW if its enough... Personally, I havnt seen any tests out there, havnt got any info @ classified sources... - Only a release date with +-10 days..
Well if we look @ yonah, and then imagine the specs of conroe we all know what time it is dont you think?
I wont comment a thing waus =)
But I beliven unless one has seen a test (under NDA?), which I havnt with conroe.. - One cant really know how it works, one can guess, yes, but... - Anyhow, I think anandtech's tests a bit strange, very odd results, all around... (yonah test)
Futher, I reed in a test it was x850XT vs. 7800GTX default clocks on both, comparing dothan platform with other platforms... - Hmm, strange the gametests shows lower fps... - Its the CPU, only the CPU, aye!?? :(
Do we need to wait for another Yonah MB, from ASUS? AOpen is not quite good for OCing, you think?
That is yet to be seen.Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyl
i had an aopen 875P board few years back, it oc'ed considerably worse than
asus/abit counterparts, was slower and with much less high fsb tolerance..
so, once someone comes up with setfsb (or aopen updates bios) for getting over that 265 fsb limit, we'll know if this board clocks like other 975x boards or not.
but one thing is positive - the hardwareluxx aopen board is still alive :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyl
The only Yonah board i've seen from Asus only has one PCIe 16X slot, and doesn't even have CPU mounting holes :stick:
is it worth picking up a 2400 yonah? im thinking about selling my opty 146, or should I go x2?