Yea, that's right, but I guess software reads the CPU code by their revision, that's why it's gotta be a Venice, cuz if it were a winchester it would be D0, or if it was a X2 it would be E6...
I also think it's something we'll never find out... :P
Printable View
Yea, that's right, but I guess software reads the CPU code by their revision, that's why it's gotta be a Venice, cuz if it were a winchester it would be D0, or if it was a X2 it would be E6...
I also think it's something we'll never find out... :P
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoL
lol ;) I agree with what your saying..
And especially this...:banana:Quote:
I also think it's something we'll never find out...
-Sean
It's not an ES - they don't look like that... ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by leviathan18
Your comment made me think for a bit and you may be right, sortof :p: I looked over the cpuz submission again and I'm begining to think that this may be a 754 pin Clawhammer 3000+ with a default speed @ 10x200. It would have to be running on a board similar to the glitched Gigabyte board that someone had reported in a past thread. That board had locked his multplier higher than should have been possible for his cpu. BTW, IIRC, a Clawhammer 3000+'s cpuid is something like 0xF4A and that pic of the cpu may not be the same one shown in the cpu-z submission....Quote:
Originally Posted by cadaveca
An official cpuid of Toledo - 00020F32h. And now look at this photo http://overclockers.ru/images/news/2.../toledo_01.jpg - this is an ES of Toledo(http://www.hwupgrade.it/articoli/1193/index.html).Quote:
That could be also... but don't really know... Cuz there are not Venice X2...
If you want to learn more about your CPU try to remove the heatspeader and then to measure the DIE square :-) It must be ~200 sqr. mm.
Yep, it's not an ES, cause It has BrandID = 4.Quote:
It's not an ES - they don't look like that...
Most likely it Toledo (200*11) which has already been marked at a factory, but here have found out some troubles with the second core and they put another CPUID registers into CPU to identifie on another way and they have interrupt marks. Especially it looks plausibly in a view of that the cost price manufacture is high, but it is necessary to reduce of the price in August. What shold they do? - Raise rentability of X2 production. How? Easy: to sell objectionable garbage, as cheaper processor.
(c) overclockers.ru
PS: surprise for Lexagon ;)
That's no hoax. It's my CPU and here is a validation link:
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=29156
(and pics in my homepage: http://koti.mbnet.fi/aop13/athlon64 )
I bought it 6/27/2005 from finnish online-store called ATK-Agentti. We have tested it in Asus A8N-SLI and Epox 9NDA3+ mobos (epox is my, asus is my friends). Multipliers 5-11x work and 9x is default.
edit: When multiplier is 9x CPU-Z says that the CPU is Venice but when I increase multiplier CPU-Z doesn't regonize the CPU.
edit2: Took me over a week to answer because I was on trip to other side of my country.
1. It does when I use 9x multi (default).Quote:
Originally Posted by Ref
2. CPU name stays the same if I increase multi.
3. Yes.
Answer: default multi is 9x.
I'm the owner of the CPU in Sampsas first post - ask me if you have anything to ask about that CPU.
Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
no way clawhammers 3000+ have 9x multi and 1mb l2, check my avatar
also, model on his cpu is 3 my claw is 4 so it's def not a claw