FX55 San Diego 0513MPMW OC tests

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

06-18-2005, 09:18 AM
Onepagebook

just figured out how to let it run under cascade..wa haha..
and I got this:
**it can't do colder than -73c evap reading, and no colder than -30c cpu die reading. :toast:

http://www.ocxtreme.org/onepagebook/.../3489pi32m.jpg
06-18-2005, 09:47 AM
Waus-mod

are there allready some fx 90nm that will do under cascade, with the -100 on it?

(Opb can you check youre pm :) )
06-18-2005, 09:57 AM
Onepagebook

checked, I don't get any pm..:)
06-18-2005, 10:11 AM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by Melkizedek

like this...

http://img190.echo.cx/img190/8739/immagine38gt.png

I don't know why but here in Italy there is some shop selling this :eek:

ur picture is weird :confused:
the writing
06-18-2005, 03:08 PM
NajZ

WOW!! that has to be the highest clocked 90nm AMD chip ive seen. All the previous doubts i had about the upcoming 90nm FX57 have been cleared up. :toast:
06-18-2005, 03:21 PM
Melkizedek

good job OPB :toast: so the frost bug win :(

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

ur picture is weird :confused:
the writing

It's not mine... :stick: someone pretend to sell this cpu...

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=23511

Najz this is (actually) the highest amd 90nm clocked cpu...
06-18-2005, 08:54 PM
Dumo

Quote:

Originally Posted by Melkizedek

like this...

http://img190.echo.cx/img190/8739/immagine38gt.png

I don't know why but here in Italy there is some shop selling this :eek:

http://img178.echo.cx/img178/6510/fx0513mpmw4hi.jpg

Similiar....
06-18-2005, 09:21 PM
Cornelious0_0

Eerily similar.....
06-18-2005, 09:28 PM
justwOo

Almost too similiar...

bad joke
06-18-2005, 11:24 PM
sang

too bad for amd then.
So there will be no higher clocks with this 90nm FX series than the previous 130nm.
Looks like the only improvement was in power consumption.
I might get to the dark side..
06-19-2005, 01:52 AM
Sampsa

Quote:

Originally Posted by Melkizedek

http://img190.echo.cx/img190/8739/immagine38gt.png

I can confirm that this is a real thing since I have similar CPU sitting here, although 0512 :cool:
06-19-2005, 05:58 AM
i found nemo

damn guys ur rams and cpu's are retarted fast......do you have to wear a seatbelt with a helmet when you go on the net???
06-19-2005, 06:02 AM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sampsa

I can confirm that this is a real thing since I have similar CPU sitting here, although 0512 :cool:

but the ihs quality is weird for me
06-20-2005, 05:21 PM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sampsa

I'm pretty sure all these San Diegos suffer from cold bug so no go with cascade :(

I could run mine (0512) 3DMark stable at 3430 MHz (1,63V) with Vapochill.

Edit: I forgot to mention it's not FX-55 ;)

In no way am I trying to discredit a legend such as yourself, just wanting some clarification :): So your "non-FX55" isn't the same cpu as this?:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sampsa

My FX-55 0512MPMW can do 3DMark05 @ 3,4 GHz with 1,63V. Room temperature 30C :cool:
06-20-2005, 05:29 PM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

but the ihs quality is weird for me

IMO, that IHS looks fine..just like a brand-new cpu's IHS should look ;) :
http://img226.echo.cx/img226/4259/552bq.jpg
06-21-2005, 08:23 PM
Dumo

Few last runs before adding more cooling power....

http://img150.echo.cx/img150/1012/screenshot1112fb.jpg
06-21-2005, 09:31 PM
Cornelious0_0

Already saw the post over at [H] bro...but seriously nice...I can't wait to see that thing with some more cooling powa behing it.

Go nuts, I'll be rootin' for ya.
06-21-2005, 11:20 PM
Sampsa

Quote:

Originally Posted by s7e9h3n

In no way am I trying to discredit a legend such as yourself, just wanting some clarification :): So your "non-FX55" isn't the same cpu as this?:

No it's not. I have a 0512 FX-55 and 0512 FX-57.
06-23-2005, 05:10 AM
HARDCORECLOCKER

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sampsa

No it's not. I have a 0512 FX-55 and 0512 FX-57.

:D Hey mate - nice to hear that. If U find the time - can U compare both?

Max. stable clock & voltage consumption at same speed is interesting.

Would be nice to know if the 57er is worth the $400 more...........

:toast:
06-23-2005, 05:25 AM
FX Freak

nice work, impressive clocks, 2,5ghz and more :slobber:
@opb you need more vcore :D 1,7v or more and you hit 3,7ghz :slobber:
06-23-2005, 05:31 AM
HARDCORECLOCKER

Quote:

Originally Posted by FX Freak

nice work, impressive clocks, 2,5ghz and more :slobber:
@opb you need more vcore :D 1,7v or more and you hit 3,7ghz :slobber:

:eek: lol

:toast:
06-26-2005, 06:21 AM
fredyama

Quick SD FX-55 0513MPMW results on DICE By fredyama (=me):

http://premium1.uploadit.org/fredyam...dPI-23.438.gif

http://premium1.uploadit.org/fredyam...CPUMark477.gif
06-26-2005, 10:07 PM
Dumo

Fredyama san, thats 0513 powa :toast:
06-26-2005, 10:12 PM
bachus_anonym

Quote:

Originally Posted by PRTeamJapan

Quick SD FX-55 0513MPMW results on DICE By fredyama (=me):

Fred... Give that FX some 32M action going because I'm just a tad behind your 4000+ in Holicho's Ranking... Big time! I just need to send it to him now... :D Very nice chip indeed :toast:
06-26-2005, 11:27 PM
charlie

WOW!! Nice...

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page