D²OL Benchmark - DBench 1.1 !!!

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

03-16-2005, 11:48 AM
Jeff

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rodzilla

You're not saying you think it might not be accurate are you?

:lol: Think you've become accustomed to my temporary negative exterior Rod. :lol: I was saying it's dangerous because it makes me want to keep tweaking away until I get the best benchmark result I can possibly get.

As far as accuracy... I'm with you. It's the actual engine running actual work... can't get much more accurate than that. :up:
03-16-2005, 11:52 AM
Rodzilla

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff

:lol: Think you've become accustomed to my temporary negative exterior Rod. :lol:

No... just dont reed dat good sometime... lol.
03-16-2005, 12:02 PM
shmaa

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rodzilla

No... just dont reed dat good sometime... lol.

yeah... pooped, popped.. what's the difference ;) :with:
03-16-2005, 12:27 PM
Rodzilla

Quote:

Originally Posted by shmaa

yeah... pooped, popped.. what's the difference ;) :with:

Come up here and say that!! :stick:
03-16-2005, 12:30 PM
shmaa

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rodzilla

Come up here and say that!! :stick:

don't worry.. i'm comin :toast:
03-16-2005, 01:31 PM
Rodzilla

Ok... I ran another test on my Sempron rig running @ 1.9GHz and 2-2-2-5 on the mem.

@ 2-2-2-5 it gets 222sec
@ 2.5-3-3-6 it gets 223sec...

So in short I don't think mem timings mean shat to D2OL.
03-16-2005, 02:55 PM
Jeff

The only thing I'd recommend to people with farms is that they setup their systems with decent timings anyways. You never know when D2OL will close shop and it sucks having to reconfigure all your rigs when you change projects.

But as always, this is just my 2¢ so take it for what it's worth. ;)
03-17-2005, 12:24 PM
Paladin

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff

it sucks having to reconfigure all your rigs when you change projects.

LOL, you love it and you know it! :hehe: If D2OL found the cures for all it's targets and a new project came, you'd retweak for the new one. It's part of the sickness.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff

makes me want to keep tweaking away until I get the best benchmark result I can possibly get.

;)
03-17-2005, 12:47 PM
shmaa

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rodzilla

Ok... I ran another test on my Sempron rig running @ 1.9GHz and 2-2-2-5 on the mem.

@ 2-2-2-5 it gets 222sec
@ 2.5-3-3-6 it gets 223sec...

So in short I don't think mem timings mean shat to D2OL.

what chipset does the board you're using have?
03-17-2005, 01:08 PM
Rodzilla

Quote:

Originally Posted by shmaa

what chipset does the board you're using have?

VIA KT600
03-17-2005, 02:02 PM
WindForce

139s with the rig on my sig, 235x11 ( 2.58 ghz ) and mem @ 2.5-3-3-7 1T . I set up my rig this way since it's crunching 24/7 and NEVER shut it down ...
03-17-2005, 02:29 PM
jikdoc

if mem timings don't make much of a difference can someone try with 2gb ram?
03-17-2005, 03:32 PM
chunkylover77

1 Attachment(s)

Upped my FSB and ran it again. Just saw that you cant really see anything with my attachment. I got 145.
03-17-2005, 03:34 PM
shmaa

Little test I did...

This is on a XP-M 2600+ @ ~2.5Ghz with 1GB of Ram... timings on both tests were 2.5-3-3-11

218 x 11.5
http://www.cas.uc.edu/~smithmd/mobile/218.PNG

118 x 21
http://www.cas.uc.edu/~smithmd/mobile/118.PNG
03-17-2005, 05:49 PM
freecableguy

159 seconds with only one instance on my HT capable 4.42EE (Gallatin)
03-17-2005, 08:22 PM
shmaa

just ran it on another box... its a AXP @ 2ghz with 256mb of BH5 @ 2-2-2-11... got 209 sec out of it..
03-18-2005, 06:32 AM
RocKer

Alright i did some benches,

1:A643200+@9x260
2:A643200+@11x226
3:XPM2600+@12x200

and has you can see the MHZ do more for D2OL then FSB,i think so.

My a64 runs now at 11x226 and it runs a lot better then before at 9x260,weird is'n it.
03-18-2005, 07:23 AM
Rodzilla

Quote:

Originally Posted by RocKer

Alright i did some benches,

1:A643200+@9x260
2:A643200+@11x226
3:XPM2600+@12x200

and has you can see the MHZ do more for D2OL then FSB,i think so.

My a64 runs now at 11x226 and it runs a lot better then before at 9x260,weird is'n it.

145... Nice! :up:
03-18-2005, 03:38 PM
shmaa

More experimenting with the worthlessness of FSB to D2OL..

100 x 22
http://www.cas.uc.edu/~smithmd/mobile/100.PNG

220 x 10
http://www.cas.uc.edu/~smithmd/mobile/200.PNG
03-18-2005, 04:19 PM
shmaa

XP-M 2600+ @ 2.6 (200x13)

http://www.cas.uc.edu/~smithmd/mobile/2600d2ol.PNG
03-18-2005, 05:36 PM
Rodzilla

What was your mem speed in each of those test?????????
03-18-2005, 09:22 PM
matt9669

Coupla questions:

a) Sticky? :D

b) Anyone confirmed how this behaves in a multi-threaded/processor invironment? I.E. there a way to run 2 or 4 instances at once and combine the result? (or I suppose assuming 100% efficiency you could divide by 4, but let's stick to the real world here ;) )

c) Does the bench account for the random behavior inherent in D2OL task assignment i.e. how some tasks/targets take longer than others?

Just wondering . . .
03-19-2005, 08:01 PM
Helheim

P4 3.06 @ 3.2 = 423s
Celeron 1Ghz = 524s
PIII 550Mhz = 922s (better than nothing I guess :rolleyes: )

Maybe its time to get an A64 to replace the P4... Hmmm.
03-19-2005, 08:21 PM
[XC] moddolicous

Quote:

Originally Posted by RocKer

Alright i did some benches,

1:A643200+@9x260
2:A643200+@11x226
3:XPM2600+@12x200

and has you can see the MHZ do more for D2OL then FSB,i think so.

My a64 runs now at 11x226 and it runs a lot better then before at 9x260,weird is'n it.

The reason it might run better is because your not stresing the me at that high of an FSB anymore. Nice results btw.
03-20-2005, 06:22 AM
Charloz24

I would be interested in knowing if memory bandwith helps in D2OL. So can someone do some bench single channel VS dual channel?

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:28 AM.

XtremeSystems