Congradulations my friend, great job :toast:
Printable View
Congradulations my friend, great job :toast:
Quote:
Originally Posted by misteroadster
Looks like you guys are having a lot of fun with this contest. Just wish I had a vid card so I could join in.
Maybe in a few weeks I'll have a play in the 512kb cache class ;)
Pkrew : Thanks :toast:
BTW: you gave me a lot of work :)
Codered : yes i'd a lot of fun , and i ve learned a lot, but i hope it's just beginning , i'm waiting for your results ;)
Yeah, 600/600 is WAY easier. I still can't get my FSB to cooperate, on a 520/560 run. I've had 29,6xx, but that's the closest I can get under 2500 MHz. I'm lapping my mobile 3000+, so I might still have a shot. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by misteroadster
I hope to recieve my Winchester and Msi today, and I'll do a quick 2001Se run for you guys @520/560. If the Winchester clocks over 2.5Ghz 30k is guaranteed :banana:
i've tried a run witn an 4000+ waterchilled and mine settings , X800Vivo@XT stock cooled, settled to 604/624.
Waiting for a good FX55 :rolleyes:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8247863
no contesters ?
Can't hit anything higher than 28K :mad: , with my Winchester @2.5Ghz. And my G.Skill running @DDR500. X800XT PE @520/560.
Any tips :p: ?
Just gotta find the best RAM timings you can, then max out the FSB. :)
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8272556Quote:
Originally Posted by =STE=BloodAngel
And what was that Acpi tweak again :stick:
Also I'm using Catalyst 4.11 if I'm right.
http://members.home.nl/paul.nijpels/Winchester2.JPG
SMART mode on your HDD is killin' ya. I didn't think anyone still used that. ;)
292fps Nature @ 520/560 let alone 600/600?Quote:
Originally Posted by misteroadster
I'm @ 291fps with 645/624 :confused:
*Edit Oh I see that that is 600/600 compare;) Still what's wrong with my card?
oh, yes , i ve done a mistake , i have edited :) , it was 600/600 of course.
:)
Still @ 600/600 your Nature beats my 291fps @ 642/624 by 1fps. I don't understand this, are you playing with memory timings on the card?
yes , nature is memory dependant , and the timings helps.
Here you go, http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8275692
:banana4: 29.5k :banana4:
Now I just have to figure out that tweak everyone is talking about to get past 30k :toast:
Specs and everything in compare description.
Do I get my name in that table on the first post now :stick:
Maybe you can add the 3DMark scores in that table too, kinda hard to see what you need to beat someone.
If anyone wants to remote desktop into my PC and tweak my GPU memory you can go for it ;)
Congrats , you are near of the but :) , is it a 520/560 run ? , and the score is not so important because to be perfect it has to be +/-30100.Quote:
Originally Posted by =STE=BloodAngel
I can "tweak" more than that for you;)Quote:
Originally Posted by cuddles
Please do :D *carries on the conversation in a PM*
Yes, its run @520/560.Quote:
Originally Posted by misteroadster
Can someone please push me in the right direction with that Macci tweak, can't find the thread anymore :(
I wont get my FX55 back until 1-2 weeks :|
But them I'll post some great results :)
I have alot of BH-5 to play with ;)
Héhé , thanks all ;) , table updated.
just passed 30k :D
30006
settings:
3500+ winchester 278x9,5
Corsair CMX4400C25 2,5-3-3-8-1CR "weak dram" 2x512MB
msi K8N neo2 plat. bios 1.51
Powercolor x800xt pe stock 520/560 (omega drivers)