Grats, blinky :thumbsup:
Nice to see an effect of changing the timings to these values in "realworld" ;)
Printable View
Grats, blinky :thumbsup:
Nice to see an effect of changing the timings to these values in "realworld" ;)
grr my mobo died, ill have to break the 9500pro record with A64 and not 2600m, if i got 18.5k, and the record is 18.8k, and a64 giving me a bunch more points i think ill have it already :DQuote:
Originally Posted by SAE
anyone know how many points roughly an A64 would get me, comin from a 2.65ghz barton?
That's a great program and i just love my 2x256 A-DATA DDR400 (a-data chips)! Before i was running 2-3-2-8...3-3-5-3-2-2-3 @ 255Mhz! Now i changed to 2-3-2-8...0-0-3-3-0-0-3 @ 255Mhz!
But your a-data chips are bh-5 or not?
Have you try some benchmark(maybe Sandra)? Which is the gap between the two alpha timing setting in final score?
Thanks
As soon as possible I will try this program under my system..my mushkin are hungry :D :D
I love this tweaker :D Got over 260fsb. Timings: 2,5-3-3-11 1-3-4-3-3-4-4 :D
I think it's CH-5 chips :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Remixes
They are a-data chips but they work just like ch-5!Quote:
Originally Posted by Remixes
Maybe a-data just put their name on top.
hey SAE, just ran across this thread. have u tried 5-6-4-3-3-4-5? these timings seem to work pretty good for me. j/w if maybe u tried that but 0-3-3-1-0-3 ended up working better.Quote:
Originally Posted by SAE
and srry if u have already said so, but what are your agp cont latency, agp bus latency, and pci latency set to?
These are my tests:
@3200+ File Paging@200mb (USB ACTIVE)
-----------------YASP-----SuperPI-----Sandra Int/float
1)Timing5-2-2:--19.22-------45----------3016/2851
2)Timing11-2-2:-19.08 ----46/45--------3032/2869
3)SAESetting:---19.07-------45----------3050/2888
Now i will test with 3dmark to measure the gap in this test.
In test n°1 and 2, alpha timing are@default!
hey anyone have a idea why it wont auto load my settings? i go file>auto startup but then i open nftweaker and the settings arnt set.
Here are 3dmark01 result...[after every 3dmark I've reboot the system (FP200mb USB ON)]:
1(5-2-2)-17689
2(11-2-2)-17885
3(SAE setting)-18034
when u say "SAE" settings, what timings do u actually mean? 2-2-2-9-12 0-3-3-1-0-3?
Yes ;)
I've try also with your setting (always @3200+ 11X200), but I belive that they are good to go up with FSB with "no problem", instead, SAE setting are maxed...with them I have best score and higher FSB!
Sorry for my bad english I hope that you are understanding me... :D
ok, thnx for clearing that up. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Remixes
and dont worry bout your english.. its fine. just post some pics of some of your fine italian women and everything will be alright. :D
LOL :D :D :D
As soon as possible I will try at 11X250 (I will do the same tests), after I will try @11X260 or higher (unfortunately, my Barton is locked, and my mobo isn't modded, yesterday i've flash bios with hellfire rev3 and today I will install morpheus remix driver...so I hope to go up 11X262 / 11X264, that now is my clock limit :( )... only after I will post, now FSB is too low ;)
Greetings
For me, it seems, 0-0-3-3-0-0-2 is max speed, but not to consider stable :DQuote:
Originally Posted by FlyingHamster
Your timings are slower, but may work well for gaming. I use 4-4-5-4-3-3-4 for gaming :)
AGP C. Lat. 128 (for gaming)/255 (benching), AGP B. L. 32 (default), PCI L 128.
@Remixes: :thumbsup: You've got a nice boost with my max timings, hehe. Try the ones above in addition to the 9-2-2-2-2.0-7-12 :D
Today I've tested @11X250 and over....the clock limit is always at 260, so I'm sure that is for the too low vddr (3,26)...
SAE for 3dMark which alpha timing do you set?
These:0-0-3-3-1-0-3
or these:0-0-3-3-0-0-2
And to get tha maxed fsb?
I'm doing a lot of experiment...:D :D THX ;)
P.S: Do you optimize hell fire bios as is showed in this link? http://xtremesystems.org/forums/show...3&page=1&pp=25
I have not been doing any 3dmark for some weeks now as my 9800XT is still on RMA :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Remixes
Try to use the fastest timings as possible. For 100% stability you of course had to slow down the alphas a bit (gaming again ;) ).
I optimize my bios the way I am used to... and what's best with my hardware. In my experiences every DFI board acts differently. So there's no definite how-to to tell ya. You have to find the settings that work best for yourself, as I don't know your board personally ;)
thanks, I will give 4-4-5-4-3-3-4 a shot.Quote:
Originally Posted by SAE
my PCI L is at 32 (default). does bumping it up pose a possible threat to my mobo/hardware?
Hmm. I doubt it.Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingHamster
I always use 128 because of sound issues. My Audigy gets the same latency and everything's fine up to 260. Everything higher has no chance to last longer than 5minutes ;)
Thanks SAE :toast:
http://remixes.altervista.org/My_Record/whql.JPG
:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Remixes
Nice one.
Just today I've done 3418pts at 3dmark05 always with whql driver (with omega driver i've done 3666pts), and 23648 at 3dmark01 :)
I've used this alpha timing:
1-3-3-3-3-3-4 :banana4:
THX :toast:
Ok, could anyone help me out?
Got an Nforce 2 mobo, chipset= 400
A7n8X-X mobo revision 2.
got Twinmoss Mtec chips with Brainpower PCB
what can I change and what do you people advice me?
right now in 025B it says this :
LEFT column
enabled
23
15
6
3
3
3
RIGHT column
2
3
5
3
2
2
4
and at the bottom:
32
32
32
. so what can you advice me? and IF I mess something up will my board function to work or will resetting bios do it also? :)
thanks in advance people
sory for the shameless bump but I feel its stupid to make a whole new thread for "out of date" hardware :s
please can someone help me allong? understanding what does what and what can I change and what not?