nvm i looked at it all wrong. stupid me like always!!! *jumps out window*Quote:
Originally posted by Karnivore
As I said, this was best I could do, ran out of time, Newcastle is already returned and waiting for its new owner....
Printable View
nvm i looked at it all wrong. stupid me like always!!! *jumps out window*Quote:
Originally posted by Karnivore
As I said, this was best I could do, ran out of time, Newcastle is already returned and waiting for its new owner....
Quote:
Originally posted by saaya
yeah sorry, i got a pm right after i split the thread :D
great numbers! if you write a few sentences we could even post it on the front page. lemme know if you want to :)
i never thougt the missing cache would have such a big impact! this is really interesting! so its the best to get the 1mb chips before they all get replaced by the 512kb ones...
YGPM
got one right here ... what do you want tested ... bearing in mind my r9800 pro is bust and im using a gf4 mx440 :p .... is does have agp 8x tho \o/ :DQuote:
Originally posted by pkrew
Hardly and a 2.8 at 270 is 3.78G. With a 2.8 at 3.7G spi is 36s, 24.7K in 2001se, and would beat at A64 at 2.5-2.6 in 3d03.
I'm not sure what you mean that you have and really don't need anything tested. Like I said in the sticky great job on the comparison Karn
hehe np Peen:toast:
Quote:
Originally posted by pkrew
I'm not sure what you mean that you have and really don't need anything tested. Like I said in the sticky great job on the comparison Karn
thanks pkrew, wish I had more time to get a bit more indepth, and even a bit more variety of tests, but at least its something, and maybe it will get someone else mortivated to do some...
yw, Karn, I'm sure some people will do more testing as more get this cpu, but what you did was enough to convince me which is the better way to go.:toast:
PS: I wonder what implications this may have for 939. Makes me wonder if AMD is doing this to increase FX sales
Blah, this Clawhammer is quite the DUD:mad: LOL, max under the Prom is less than the OEM cooled Newcastle, 2.5 stable is best it will do:stick:
The Hunt continues:rolleyes:
Mine is a CG rev. I will post a CPU-Z screenshot when I come home. I will also post my default benches.Quote:
Originally posted by texuspete2k2
:stick: :slap:
:banana4:
Perhaps you are speaking of CG revision? Dunno. You don't have newcastle though if you have 1mb cache.
I tought the CG rev's where newcastle's.
I do know for 100% that the CG has the Improved QnC and memcontroller, as it's stated in the AMD whitespecs.
Link
cg is an a64 with improved mem controller, there are newcastle and clawhammer versions with the improved memory controller.
so now we have:
3200+ CW (2ghz 1mb)
3200+ CW CG (2ghz 1mb)
3200+ NC CG (2.2ghz 1/2mb)
the CW CG cores seem to be the best it seems, at least at the moment. if the newe NC CG cores oc 100mhz higher they will catch up and outperform the CW CG chips everywhere it seems.
in my country they still got loads of 2-2-2 chips, such as the khx3000 and a few sotres got khx3200 non-A... does this mean these are BH-5 or just other chips?Quote:
Originally posted by DaveX
Your local Fry's has possible BH-5?
NOOOOO! Stupid local Fry's here only has over-priced Mushkin Special 2-2-2- and some CH-5.
nice i just planned to buy 3400+ 512k cache with 12 mult this news tell me that they will be here shortly
Check out this list...hope I don't get banned for the link :(Quote:
Originally posted by biohead
in my country they still got loads of 2-2-2 chips, such as the khx3000 and a few sotres got khx3200 non-A... does this mean these are BH-5 or just other chips?
http://www.xtremeresources.com/forum...625#post399625
all BH-5/6 chips aren't in production anymore :( I think you'll have to be really really lucky to get a BH-5/6 chip... f*f*s why did they stop producing it? :'(