I was sure to have allredy seen this graphs, was just not sure when ..
Printable View
I was sure to have allredy seen this graphs, was just not sure when ..
I wonder when mods are going to follow through on their word and start banning people for posting his crap...Quote:
Originally Posted by boxleitnerb
garbage
he needs to try harder next time :rolleyes:
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.p...postcount=6613
What's with the attitude? As long as his news are not of a bashing nature, where is the problem? It might be true or not, but we can still discuss about it, can we not?
Doesn't matter. Read the rules.Quote:
Originally Posted by boxleitnerb
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post4914806
Live event is not available ? I cant find it ... That's 2.30pm pt, no :confused:
Obr :(
I think it's silly, but okay. You all probably know that someone else could post a repost of OBRs news from another site/forum tomorrow and there would be no problem...Quote:
Originally Posted by LordEC911
The problem is that you made it obvious IN CAPITAL LETTERS WHERE YOU GOT IT FROM. others would put it in lower case.Quote:
Originally Posted by boxleitnerb
capital or lowercase, at least we know how credible it is before we read it. i hate when its a link of a forum of a blog of a news article of a facebook update of a friend of obrQuote:
Originally Posted by stangracin3
Not intentionally. I just copied the link as it is - which you would have noticed if you actually would have followed it. I have no agenda, I just wanted to share information.Quote:
Originally Posted by stangracin3
A GTX560ti replacement that costs considerably more than a GTX570, nice. I hope thats not true.
I think people just need to stop reading OBR (or any other site that tries to leak stuff early) imo.
-PB
then where would we get legit news from?Quote:
Originally Posted by paulbagz
Launch reviews?Quote:
Originally Posted by stangracin3
What does it matter if we know how much RAM it has 3 months before release anyway?
Doesn't get a card in my machine any quicker.
-PB
He got banned due to his behavior on the forums while constantly advertising his website if I'm not mistaken. It was right around the time they really started cracking down on the trolling in the news section. I don't think that it had anything to with leaks. Thats kind of what the news section is for.Quote:
Originally Posted by paulbagz
Indeed.
My comments were made more as a, take what you see with a pinch of salt instead of the gospel truth.
I have no ill will against *he who shall not be named* or what he does.
-PB
read your quote. all sites leak things. you said we shouldn't be allowed to post those sites. where would we get news from now?Quote:
Originally Posted by paulbagz
Where did I say you're not allowed to post leaks?Quote:
Originally Posted by stangracin3
Por que?
Maybe read a bit better?
-PB
Quote:
Originally Posted by paulbagz
Quote:
Originally Posted by stangracin3
...Quote:
Originally Posted by paulbagz
PB, your posts are often short in nature and lack any real contribution to discussions anyway :shrug:
Apologies if you see it that way?
I shall endeavor to contribute better in future.
-PB
if that is close to right then that explains why there is no kepler news. kepler is very delayed like semiaccurate has said, and only the sorta-good gk104 is going to be ready any time soon. so the 7970 could be in for another long run like 5870 had.Quote:
Originally Posted by boxleitnerb
well, i see another problem there, i think thoses spec are fake somewhere, but a quick calculation.. 12geometry engine, 96TMU said 12 SM x 48SP = 576SP ( the 560 = 8x48SP ) the 580 had 32SP x 16SM .
560 = half the number of SM you find in the 580. ( the easiest way for scale the architecture and have scaling for size, cost,TMU, Geometry in the line up )
GK110 could well be: 24SMx32SP = 768SP + 24 polymorph engine. ( 2x the number of SM you find in the GK104 ). if thoses spec are right, we are back to initial speculation.
Just look back who was right last time with Fermi launch:
FACT
AN00BIS was right!
- almost 6months before GTX480 launch
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ia-gt300/page4
"Pessimists" like me got some right
- near 300W
- huge chip with fab issues
- clocks dont scale to 5870 levels.
- at least 20% faster than 5870.
Wrong:
- DX11 Tessellation and Compute driver support lot better than expected - Home Run hit!
- nowhere near expected $699
- Said it was not feasable, but they made a 2xFermi = GTX 590.
========================
Kepler Prediction
- a bit smaller than previous high end - 490mm2
- 5.5B trans... likely 960 shader /ALU 24x40?? ... (tiny chance 1124 shader... designer probably worried about yields)
- guessing mainstream parts will be like 640SP.
- much higher GPU clocks - unlike AMD sheer number of units, much higher TLP, and ILP.
- doubt anybody's willing to risk moving away from 5.5Ghz+ GDDR5
- nVidia has a lot of experience with 384bit memory - one more time!
- its a given, the shader organization will be different, and more fine grained (ie 4 sections each with their own L2, tesselation etc).
mainstream SP trend is: 128 >88%> 240 >113%> 512....960
112 >>50%>>192>>75%>>336 .... 640-720