Its becoze i dont know much things about AMD, so what im doing is transport what ive heard in other treads.Quote:
Originally posted by texuspete2k2
No offence, but you know what about this? Or are you his spokesman?:toast:
Printable View
Its becoze i dont know much things about AMD, so what im doing is transport what ive heard in other treads.Quote:
Originally posted by texuspete2k2
No offence, but you know what about this? Or are you his spokesman?:toast:
I definitely respect your opinion, it's just i know I surely couldnt compare two springdale boards on the basis of a couple hundred marks without having them in hand. Thats all I meant. :toast:
Oh mongoled:
I've got both too but can't do any direct comparisons with projects I have saved for one reason or another. Like my VC doesnt clock as high but having said that.... I agree I think NF7 has more pop but the infinity is more consistent. With same ram timings and amount, OS, drivers, VC everything only board different. I got 18k on the inifinity at 231*10=2.31G and VC clocks of 365/320 and on my abit at 208*11.5=2.38G, 383/320. Hard to compare right, but I know 23 fsb made up for 70MHz CPU and 17MHz Graphics core, I thought it might be more.Quote:
The only results I i trust from what i have read are those which have been made by peeps who have had both the NF7 and the DFI brd. At the moment this is Iolao and SAE. I trust their judgement on the installation of the OS and also that they are using the same components in their comparissons.
----------------------------------------------------------
I mentioned my bios findings and I hate to beat a dead horse but but if anyone does 3dmark or any other performance testing between bios's it is necessary to try the latest 12/31 with Command per Clock back on. I agree about the nosedive in performance on 12/31 but you can get it back plus whatever other benefits. I got my 500 back (lost from 12/10 and 12/18) and another 100. I have double sided ram. It's just tougher on ram it seems... standard fair. Makes more sense than thinking the board magic bios gives 20 more fsb. Add the volts and it will still go. It just needs to be mentioned when we are talking about a couple hundred marks because this alone is easily a couple hundred. Then I think abit wins by a more moderate amount, and thats provided you get one that isnt bad.
oh!!!! I was only saying a supposition...LOL
+ the ex-Abit, Now DFI engineer putting out the beta bioses :)Quote:
Originally posted by Vanrick
DFI overclocks very high bc of its voltage options.
What does "stuffed up" mean? :confused:Quote:
Originally posted by Ragnarok
btw xDUCK, ur drago looks very very stuffed up for those clocks...
messed up.Quote:
Originally posted by xDUCK
What does "stuffed up" mean? :confused:
looks low to me
xDUCK do you have a compare?
Huh? I assume you mean this, but I linked my "22,890" post with it already... :confused:Quote:
Originally posted by Hallowed
xDUCK do you have a compare?
look the first post of the page;)
I just skim read, sorry. :)
*edit*
xDUCK, why not bench at a higher FSB? Very nice GFX scores though. :)
I know this aint a record but i was able to hit 272 dual channel 1:1 with a 2.5,3,3,11 timing. I used tictacs modded bios d10beta2. XDUCK if you should give one of his bios's a try. They clock pretty high. you get get them here:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...threadid=26343
I got my DFI Infinity in totday but there is a big problem. The prometeia cools the cpu to well. And the mainboard thinks that the cpu = 250 + and will not pass the post screen. I wiated an few min and powerd the pc without starting the prom en it would go past the post.
Has anyone a fix for this problem ? My Abit would boot @ 252c ( it was -42 )
i think there was a beta bios that was modded by tictac to turn off the temp warning.
Looks like the AXP is capable of the same bandwidth as the A64.
So much for the integrated memory controller...by nature it should have a lower latency but that's not what Sandra is showing us.
Sandra isn't showing latency either so and buffered sandra is very depending on other things then memories and memorycontroller. Unbuffered is better to use for comparing but still isn't really good. I like to see an nF2 pull of 4000/4000 in sandra buffered at ~260 also ;)Quote:
Originally posted by Soulburner
Looks like the AXP is capable of the same bandwidth as the A64.
So much for the integrated memory controller...by nature it should have a lower latency but that's not what Sandra is showing us.
Use ScienceMark 2.0, wich also measures latencies and i'm sure A64 will be winning.
necroposting is teh baid
sorry.....
didnt notice bout the date....
really sorry......
sorry... didnt notice the date :D :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Shroomalistic