Hexus Website Break NDA - Leak Nvidia GTX480 Benchmarks!!

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

03-26-2010, 05:32 PM
=[PULSAR]=

They need a 470 in there too.
03-26-2010, 05:36 PM
omar little

Quote:

Originally Posted by AliG

According to this the 480 only consumes 16 more watts than the 5970.

theres something about this sentence that makes me laugh and cry at the same time
03-26-2010, 05:51 PM
ChaosMinionX

Quote:

Originally Posted by STEvil

need some 4870X2 and 4890 numbers added

Well pretty much the 4870X2 is around a single 5870 in terms of performance... closer to behind the 5870 because of driver support and having to have a crossfire profile. The 4890 is an overclocked 4870, so its like 10-15% faster than a single 4870 which is still not equal to a 4870X2 so I think you could derive a conclusion from there.
03-26-2010, 08:42 PM
STEvil

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChaosMinionX

Well pretty much the 4870X2 is around a single 5870 in terms of performance... closer to behind the 5870 because of driver support and having to have a crossfire profile. The 4890 is an overclocked 4870, so its like 10-15% faster than a single 4870 which is still not equal to a 4870X2 so I think you could derive a conclusion from there.

Anand had some 4870x2 numbers (iirc, read a few..). Looks 4870x2 pulls ahead of the 5870 now a bit with newer drivers more often than it used to. Could just be the review(s) too though.

Either way, 4870x2, 5870, gtx480 all hit in the same area until memory or shader constraints..
03-26-2010, 08:58 PM
Serpentarius

funny, i havent came across any reviews ... with the ECC RAM mentioned ....

ECC supposed to be one of the selling points .... anyone got review links which mentioned ECC?

man, i was expecting 480 to topple 5970 ... but instead .... whatever
03-26-2010, 09:43 PM
=[PULSAR]=

Any thoughts to whether these benchmarks are forced DX10 for comparison?
03-26-2010, 10:36 PM
STEvil

Quote:

Originally Posted by Serpentarius

funny, i havent came across any reviews ... with the ECC RAM mentioned ....

ECC supposed to be one of the selling points .... anyone got review links which mentioned ECC?

man, i was expecting 480 to topple 5970 ... but instead .... whatever

Anand.

Pulsar - Dunno.
03-26-2010, 11:28 PM
Garrett

Performance is what I expected... but the temperatures omg...
Definitely not bang for the buck :down:
03-27-2010, 12:28 AM
Shadov

Huge die size, even bigger power draw and sizzling temperatures.

Im sorry but this card is a FAIL.

HD 5870 here I come!
03-27-2010, 02:36 AM
JkS

Anyone notice the near linear scaling with SLi in Anands review?
03-27-2010, 04:50 AM
zalbard

Interesting testing methology.
I like their bang for buck charts. :up:

Quote:

Originally Posted by EniGmA1987

I always thought Fermi would be exactly like the 2900XTX. I wasnt right, but it is somewhat like that launch. Hopefully these will be priced low enough that they will be able to compete with ATI's top cards.

Wonder how good availability is going to be, too. 5850 is still the value champion it seems.
03-27-2010, 05:04 AM
Motiv

Quote:

Originally Posted by zalbard

Interesting testing methology.
I like their bang for buck charts. :up:

Wonder how good availability is going to be, too. 5850 is still the value champion it seems.

I wonder how the second hand market for 5850's will fare once some of the owners decide to take fermie.
03-27-2010, 08:26 AM
shiznit93

Quote:

Originally Posted by JkS

Anyone notice the near linear scaling with SLi in Anands review?

notice how none of these sites notice micro-stutter? fraps is meaningless with sli.
03-27-2010, 08:28 AM
FischOderAal

Quote:

Originally Posted by Motiv

I wonder how the second hand market for 5850's will fare once some of the owners decide to take fermie.

Why would anyone "upgrade" from HD 5850 to Fermi? :confused:

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page