Score : 6412
http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/6...1280077.th.jpg
Printable View
wow, a train of new results hehe, I'll update shortly.
There should be absolutely no GPU usage, the bench is very sensitive to RAM Bandwidth, Cache (L3 speed), (so those uncore/CPU-NB clocks) so perhaps your other system isn't as fast there..?
rig in sig, 24/7 settings
9056
ran it with HT off same settings otherwise, and got 8431
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...s3430/jjuj.png
5349 points
Attachment 103894
Whoa MajorD, you mixed me up with Pyr0:
should be:Quote:
----- #8 ---- 6460 - gmat -------------Intel Core i7 920--------- 3800Mhz -- 4/8-- DDR3-1810 8-8-8-24
and i'll try to post a new bench next week after the WCG effort is over ;)Quote:
----- #8 ---- 6460 - gmat -------------Intel Core i7 975EE------- 4142Mhz -- 4/8-- DDR3-2000 8-8-8-24
sorry gmat, fixed up..
So many results to post this update, got a bit muddled.
If I can ask a small favor of you guys, can you please format as per OP but without all the spacer lines would be really handy if you have time..
[ Score-Nick-CPU-Mhz-Core/thread- Ram details if you want ]
much appreciated..
Couple of comments.
Rubycon.. your 2000 extra pts came from the 2 extra cores! ;)
WOW @ Justin.Kerr . so close to 10K. congrats on a close 1st place there
and finally, thanks to Lightning man for the first Thuban results.. you can do 6k! ;)
The three computers I use the most:
Phenom X3
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...h-PhenomX3.png
E5200
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...ench-E5200.png
Core2Quad
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...-Core2Quad.png
Nice tracer, runs smooth, load @80%.
Third run improved almost 1000 over second, that improved 500 over the first round. :rofl:
Third posted.
(Improvement second on third seems to be a glitch of the memory - Got errors soon after, reseated the memory, and now 3-500 points gain first to second. More bring no real gain) :shrug:
Run7 improved to 8951 :ROTF:
Did several runs now, using same setup, different settings.
Mem-tuning seems to be as relevant in improving scores, as high clocks.
Works nice, and almost clock-equal to Linx for stability testing.
Prime95 needs 1Mhz FSB less, to run stable with the same settings.
:clap::clap: Like it, this nifty little program :clap::clap:
Swapped mobo.
RexIII :up:- sofar on par with Classy:up:.
Again, great for quick stability testing. 1 click behind on LinX , 2 clicks behind on Prime95.
heres an x6 result.. for lightman :)
click for 1900x1200
http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i8...una4340mhz.png
i must of missed something with this bench... if its ray tracing ...why is there so much aliasing... i dont get it...
doesnt ray tracing eradicate aliasing all together....???????????????
No, it doesn't ;) You need to supersample RT to get decent results.Quote:
Originally Posted by purecain
no. ray tracing has the same problem because it determines visible surfaces in image precision (pixels) as opposed to object precision (primitives). from a mathematical view pixels are an x,y coordinate which are infinitesimally small but represent a finite area on a monitor. if you take one sample (a ray in this case) you are representing only one component of the information at that pixel.Quote:
Originally Posted by purecain