should FUGGER use the multipliers on his P4EE/ES?

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

12-03-2003, 12:06 PM
Try-this

Here's why I voted yes!:

Why have a ES and not use it 100% :confused:
12-06-2003, 06:41 AM
Tedinde

Quote:

I do not work for Intel, I am a IPD

Man i got hit intel. Signed up for the IPD program a year ago just to hustle cheap chips, Havnt checked it in a while for 3.2ee's.

Bought every other chips on there super cheap
12-06-2003, 05:22 PM
Sampsa

Some Intel Pentium 4 EE results with R404 compressor:

http://www.muropaketti.com/artikkelit/cpu/p4ee/oc_1.jpg

http://www.muropaketti.com/artikkelit/cpu/p4ee/
12-07-2003, 05:07 AM
JoeBar

Quote:

Originally posted by Try-this
Here's why I voted yes!:

Why have a ES and not use it 100% :confused:

Agree! Many ppl out there would :slash: for an ES P4...
12-07-2003, 05:16 AM
Geforce4ti4200

meh an athlon fx is much better than even an unlocked p4ee :)
12-07-2003, 02:20 PM
Soulburner

Quote:

Originally posted by Geforce4ti4200
meh an athlon fx is much better than even an unlocked p4ee :)

And you have done the tests to back this up?

Personally I think we could have seen 30k weeks ago, and not from AMD.
12-07-2003, 02:54 PM
Tedinde

Alls fair!!!!

But let him hit the number 1 spot in 3dmark, with an other than what everyone else can get multi, can you will see the crying going on and cheating accusations.

but then his is not the only chip.

Would be nice to see what difference it makes with differnt mults even if he only posted his 3dmark scores in our forums.

But he know's what he's doing. Making it an even playing field.

Question is what would you all do. Yes or know if it would mean your name at the top of that list!!!!
12-07-2003, 03:55 PM
pik-ard v1.1

if i had the chip, and it was unlocked, i would use it no doubt.

3dmark2k1 isnt about "fair", its about doing the best with what you have, not with what everyone else has...
12-07-2003, 04:24 PM
Charles Wirth

I have played possum long enough with my DDR @ 220Mhz scores.

I am now posting lower multiples. Gonna finish FX and strap in the XT.
12-07-2003, 04:25 PM
tritium

Quote:

Personally I think we could have seen 30k weeks ago, and not from AMD

Well I wish he would post that score on these forums. He doesnt need to publish them on the ORB.

I would like to see what that ES can do against a STOCK FX.

AMD--Intel who cares.
12-07-2003, 06:00 PM
STEvil

Quote:

Originally posted by FUGGER
I have played possum long enough with my DDR @ 220Mhz scores.

I am now posting lower multiples. Gonna finish FX and strap in the XT.

Just pump 4.3v into the ram and run it 1:1 @ 290mhz+

:D
12-07-2003, 06:09 PM
Soulburner

Quote:

Originally posted by STEvil
Just pump 4.3v into the ram and run it 1:1 @ 290mhz+

:D

He has stated that they do nothing over 2.9v. They are not BH5 like you think.
12-07-2003, 10:11 PM
STEvil

So get some BH-5's

He's running normal ram, not registered or ECC.
12-09-2003, 03:57 PM
cpulloverclock

That's a new WR
always MEMESAMA
awesome :slobber:
incredible :eek:
impressive oc

M/B ASUS P4C800/ BIOS1007
CPU Pentium4 XE 3.20GHz SL7AA 3339A517
CPU Cooling@LN2
MemoryKingston KHX3500@CL2@256MB x2
VGACanopus ZXR PCI
HDDIBM DTLA@‚P‚TG
Power supl™Fzippy HP2-6460P Powered by Ks
Vcore 2.15V/ Vddr 3.44V/ Vio 3.70V
OS Windows Server 2003
Clock 5326.36Mhz@FSB332.90Mhz multi 16

http://members.jcom.home.ne.jp/3233730401/WS000123.JPG
12-09-2003, 05:44 PM
charlie

un-freaking-believable....if these guys benched 3D, and OC'ed their CPU's and GPU's with LN2 and tons of volts...
They'd make Opp and the rest of us top 5 look like kids playing in the sand box...

C
12-09-2003, 05:48 PM
Soulburner

At first I saw the 5300+ then I was like wow, they beat macci by a bit...figured it was a 3.2c given the 16 multiplier.

Then I looked again......

.........It's a freaking 1.6!!!!!!!!!!!!
12-09-2003, 05:51 PM
sandman

OMFG!

That's insane.
12-09-2003, 05:51 PM
charlie

No. It's a 3.2EE, they have a bug in Wcpuid that shows it as a 1.6G... Notice the L3 cache....this means that obviously on LN2 you could bench a 3.2EE at 5Ghz for an easy 30.5K '01

C
12-09-2003, 06:00 PM
Soulburner

Hm you're right it is bugged. They need to start using CPU-Z....WCPUID hasn't been updated since December 2002.

And it would do much higher than 30.5k. For my 2.4, a 600mhz overclock is worth 2000 points. Now, since things start to scale so fast up that high, PLUS the L3 cache as well, I wouldn't be surprised to see 32k out of it with max 9800XT clocks.
12-09-2003, 06:02 PM
Charles Wirth

Damn those SL7AA's are screamers.

Side not from my testing, that bios rev 1007 is not EE ready and the L3 cache is sitting unused even though it is visible. I been there

That is helping the overclock to some degree. But still an awesome overclock.
12-09-2003, 06:52 PM
pik-ard v1.1

where did you find that screeny?

where are these things posted first?
12-09-2003, 08:30 PM
Hobocrow

Quote:

Originally posted by FUGGER
I have played possum long enough with my DDR @ 220Mhz scores.

I am now posting lower multiples. Gonna finish FX and strap in the XT.

Am I reading your compare scores wrong...or, haven't you already used lower multi's??
12-09-2003, 10:18 PM
Geforce4ti4200

dont be so sure, just cause they can get a screenshot at over 5GHz doesnt mean they can do 3dmark much past 4.5GHz. also ln2 tends to kill your hardware in a hurry. too expensive to kill stuff for a chance at more 3dmarks
12-09-2003, 10:57 PM
charlie

Here's my experience with screenshots...
I got a screenshot of my FX-51 @ 3140, but ran 3D MArk at 2900.
My P4 Northie screens at 4.05gHz but benches at 3.75gHz...
So call it 93%??
5.3gHz screenshot = 4.9ghz bench....maybe not dead accurate, but darn close I bet...

C
12-09-2003, 11:37 PM
Geforce4ti4200

probably, who knows untill those guys try it. have any of you had luck with ln2?

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page