First, take 1000MB (Crystaldiskmark) - not 100MB, because your write-cache is greater.
IOmeter is a fine benchmark-tool. HDtune an HDtach are inexpressive benches (only seq. data-rate).
Try HDtune Pro (File Benchmark), h2benchw and FC-Test
I will see more random write benches.
AristoChat @ luxx asked for arc1231+512MB @ 1000MB crystaldiskmark
heres the response
http://img389.imageshack.us/img389/1565/512as7.png
Which SSDs?
btw:
I know Aristo
He is a sophisticated user like me ;)
the same 4x px.. if any different i wouldve stated so
4x @ arc1231Quote:
Originally Posted by F.E.A.R.
http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/6917/87830800ws9.png
http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/7032/20662677nf2.png
http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/4/128zs5.png
http://img386.imageshack.us/img386/2214/256zh8.png
http://img386.imageshack.us/img386/5808/512xu1.png
http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/4180/44805214zh9.png
http://img389.imageshack.us/img389/9872/53734470cm6.png
http://img128.imageshack.us/img128/4380/28682940bw2.png
http://img356.imageshack.us/img356/1734/24715162oz8.png
http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/4277/87074487xr8.png
http://img75.imageshack.us/img75/6624/48760374qk6.png
http://img75.imageshack.us/img75/4986/75977645sw0.png
Could you tell us about the initialization time of the RAID cards ?
I know the ICH10R only takes 2-3 seconds before booting starts, but how long does this take with the 'real' RAID cards ?
I can tell you for the Highpoint 3510/20 and Adaptec 5405/5805 because I own these.. Highpoint is really smooth and fast, 6-7 seconds in total I'd estimate. Adaptec is very slow, around 40s for Kernel Boot + another 7-8 seconds for Array init.
Areca is pretty fast too if I recall that boot video I saw correctly, 5-10s? Something like that.
LOL on Adaptec boot times! Damn its the 21st century!! 40+sec
I can eat my lunch faster than that!
^ thanks jcool
adaptecs boot times arent so bad vs areca 1230 + 1gb cache.. would take more than minute to initialize
Hmm, that's a bit of a pity... I thought the Adaptec 5405 would be the ideal card to buy: SAS support (= 15k.6 support), fast (1.2 ghz Dualcore), relatively cheap and good software.
But boot time is also quite important to me, the ARC1231 and RR3520 are the better options in that perspective, with about the same performance.
Anyone knows how long the ARC1231 would take to boot in RAID0?
Wait.. Napalm did you just say Arecas need longer for init when you pack them with lots of cache? Or just the 1230?
i only use raid0.. i dont think it takes any longer/shorter @ other raidQuote:
Originally Posted by FreeRider
1231 is pretty fast for its size/complexity
2x arc1210 + arc1231 all three at the same time boot faster than 1x 5805
just 1230.. i dont have it anymore but even @ original 256mb cache it probably took as long as 5805 or longer.. 1gb cache @ 1-1.5 minute.. though once booted things got fast lolQuote:
Originally Posted by jcool
@ Napalm
What says "Random Access" (HDtune 3.50)?
@ F.E.A.R.
4x @ arc1231
http://img58.imageshack.us/img58/5453/readvf7.pnghttp://img67.imageshack.us/img67/2035/writedw5.png
they need to fix their write tests
after 64k the controller stays throttled @ max for 5+ minutes
wow
that numbers are just amazing
I barely can achieve 120mb/s read with my 2x HDD-s
I want SSD :(
dont worry you havent missed anything.. just crazy high prices.. 2009 will change thatQuote:
Originally Posted by <<HANNIBAL>>
ill continue here..Quote:
Originally Posted by F.E.A.R.
SLC.. its not the typical write-deficiency
"after 64k the controller stays throttled @ max for 5+ minutes"
heres seq read after random write finishes:
http://img393.imageshack.us/img393/1263/readjk6.png
that 0MB/s takes several minutes until the controller returns to normal
9.8MB/s max during those several minutes
file benchmark was all over the place @ ver 3.10.. that was fixed @ ver 3.50
in response to how fast all these benches/ssds/controller boot windows
4x @ arc1231
http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/204/1231re6.png
I'm a bit confused.Quote:
Originally Posted by NapalmV5
Does that boot timer start before or after the raid controller starts to initialize?
probably after the controller finishes initializing if he's booting from the SSD aray
Hm, i donīt believe 4,578s.???
With initializing-time of the ARC-1231ML he got more than 4,578s. ;)
@ Napalm
My next project.
http://www.forumdeluxx.de/forum/showthread.php?t=580981
after bios and array, boot times are fast.Quote:
Originally Posted by F.E.A.R.
much faster than with my velociraptor and that was without array.
I got a decent boost from the December 8 firmware on my adaptec as well. I've written them and they say they still don't support SSD but are working with the manufacturers so I expect their numbers to eventually go way up.
http://www.techworld.com/storage/new...?newsid=106903
Interesting I wonder if turning off READ cache would help. Don't want to touch write cache.
Edit: Access time was about the small file reads were crap.
I turned off my read cache for exactly that reason :). Reads are plenty fast on ALL SSDs.Quote:
Originally Posted by ewitte
I'll probably be selling my 5405 when new SSD raid cards get released (the 1405 is non raid). Performance does indeed suffer quite a bit by using the controller versus onboard (of course without taking cache into account, which makes the controller useful even with a performance drop).