F@H core never uses more then 1-2% of one of my cores. Is my 8600GT too weak to pull more? lol
Printable View
F@H core never uses more then 1-2% of one of my cores. Is my 8600GT too weak to pull more? lol
Dont bother with 177.39, It upped my PPD by 300 ish, But it crashes games. Not very stable.
If you are all getting lower CPU utilization with slower CPUs, then why does the GPU client take 1 core for itself?
http://database.he-computer.de/Bilder/fahcpu.jpg
:shrug:
same case for me and i am waiting for an explanationQuote:
Originally Posted by jcool
Same here but on my bro's Vista rig it says it uses under 10% of a CPU core(which I know is bs). Maybe its a Vista thing?
ok i got mine to work now, but its pretty slow...
E8400 Stock
EVGA 8800 Ultra
Win Vista 32bit
174.55 (only one i could get to work)
fahmon reports 2490.35 ppd
ouch:( is there any way to boost this up? thanks
http://img440.imageshack.us/my.php?image=coreud6.jpg
1-2%
='[
Current PPD Watercooled q9450, 9800GTX, G.SKILL 1066
http://img116.imageshack.us/img116/7...dingcv6.th.jpg
Are you Nvidia guys making sure your GPUs switch to 3D clock speeds when you use F@H? If you're folding in 2D mode you will get relatively low PPD.
Could someone please post the data from project 500x the nvidia clients get?
Is this possible wanna try something. :D
Thx
they're at the bottom of this page http://fah-web.stanford.edu/psummary.html
plus just look at all labeled GROGPU2 for all the gpu2 wu's...
edit: just read the fine print at the bottom
"Projects in beta are not listed on this chart, as requested previously "
G80/G92 don't even have a 2D mode, they only run in 3D (that's why they eat too much power when idle). Only the new GT200 cards have multiple modes, but they should be running a full speed with the FAH client.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mechromancer
Ok, I just tried in vain to install 177.35 on XP x64. Installer runs through very fast (like 3 seconds), that's too fast even for my 15k SAS drive. No screen flickers or similar. It does say install complete, but after a reboot it shows no installed driver. HW acceleration is down etc, what a crap.
Might give 177.39 a try but it sure seems like the 174.55 is the only one working on XP, be it 32 or 64bits.
[22:51:04] + Processing work unit
[22:51:04] Core required: FahCore_11.exe
[22:51:04] Core found.
[22:51:04] Working on Unit 01 [June 23 22:51:04]
[22:51:04] + Working ...
[22:51:04]
[22:51:04] *------------------------------*
[22:51:04] Folding@Home GPU Core - Beta
[22:51:04] Version 1.05 (Thu Jun 12 15:39:34 PDT 2008)
[22:51:04]
[22:51:04] Compiler :
[22:51:04] Build host: amoeba
[22:51:04] Preparing to commence simulation
[22:51:04] - Looking at optimizations...
[22:51:04] - Created dyn
[22:51:04] - Files status OK
[22:51:04] - Expanded 42173 -> 246249 (decompressed 583.9 percent)
[22:51:04] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=42173 data_size=246249, decompressed_data_size=246249 diff=0
[22:51:04] - Digital signature verified
[22:51:04]
[22:51:04] Project: 5001 (Run 8, Clone 12, Gen 135)
[22:51:04]
[22:51:04] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[22:51:04] Entering M.D.
[22:51:11] mdrun_gpu returned -1
[22:51:11] Going to send back what have done.
[22:51:12] logfile size: 5449 info=5449 bed=25 hdr=1
[22:51:12] - Writing 5987 bytes of core data to disk...
[22:51:12] Done: 5475 -> 2001 (compressed to 36.5 percent)
[22:51:12] ... Done.
[22:51:12]
[22:51:12] Folding@home Core Shutdown: UNSTABLE_MACHINE
[22:51:14] CoreStatus = 7A (122)
[22:51:14] Sending work to server
[22:51:14] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.
[22:51:14] + Attempting to send results
[22:51:15] + Results successfully sent
[22:51:15] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[22:51:19] EUE limit exceeded. Pausing 24 hours.
so uh, whats wrong with this thing? Overclock is stable and I didn't change anything :shrug:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr_at_Home
that work unit musthave not agreed with your card clocks. i guess just turn it down some and try again
E2180@3.3ghz
Leadtek 9600GT
2gig XMS2
winxp32 sp2
920 PPD, doesnt matter what drivers i use :C The modded drivers(177.35) gave me a 200 point increase in 3dmark06 though.
I was back at stock clocks when I copy+pasted that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aleki
Anyways, reinstalled 177.35 driver and gpu client and it's going fine now. :up:
new 175.19 work w/ f@h yet?
hey guys what would be better 8800gt or 9600gt? thinking about picking one up to crunch. and does sli work?
8800gt would be much better.
175.19 work like a charm with no modding! and were just released yesterday
churning through a WUs very fast
Hmmm, my PPD was in the 8K range, now it says 5800ish...
Did something change in the past 3 or 4 days?
they added new projects over the last couple days. maybe those are whats tieing you down?Quote:
Originally Posted by ZOMGVTEK
ps: 8k-ppd is nuts!
How hot are the G92's suposed to run?
About what does a stock 8800GTS run at on the core in 26+º ambients?
Im just chillin at 70º for a few days now... No errors since i downed the clocks a tad.
Ive been doing a whole bunch of these big 479 point WU's. I used to run only the small 90 some ones. Those things took 15 mins, these are taking almost 2 hours!Quote:
Originally Posted by Aleki