Just ordered one too. Thx Quoc. :up:
Printable View
Just ordered one too. Thx Quoc. :up:
I like the looks and after seeing the lack of consistency in the V1 mounting, I'm thinking the pro mount for V1 or this new mounting on V2 should help with consistency of mounts.
The only performance difference I can see is the sealed chamber which you already get with the nozzle kit using the washer.
That's still good though, I think the washer in the stock kit does MOST of the performance advantage of the nozzle kit. And the pro-mount of the V1 is now standard in V2.
Looks to me like:
Performance would be the same unless you're comparing V1 without a washer.
V2 = V1 + Nozzle Washer
and you get one more quad nozzle option.
Only thing I can't see is if this new midplate/o-ring bowes the base more than the V1 Fuzion midplate does. That could have some advantage over V1 in a more bowed base. You could still do that with V1 by using an o-ring instead of the kit washer, but it's not part of any kit.
Anyone who tested the v2
sweet going to order 2 w/the quad core insert plate :)
erm any benefits over the old one , i like to look of the old one better [puts on flack jacket]
now who's sending one over to martin?
Wow Admin Is Here Hoping For Results?
crap. draining my system is such a pita...
WHY DID YOU HAVE TO DO THIS TO ME D-TEK?!? I THOUGHT THAT MY LOOP WAS COMPLETE :(
seriously though, how much better do these perform than the v1's w/ quad nozzle. im a friggin addict and my computer doesnt stay assembled for more than 2 weeks at a time. some one help me with this addiction :(
i wonders if the quad mid-plate would fit on the v1
Ahh crap! :rolleyes: Why does I'm always the last to know about these things :D They should have at least made an announcement from their website about a long holiday (unless im completely blind and missed it)
I jsut hope they wont get mad at me once they're back because I'd sent a lot of emails to them for follow-ups and order cancellation :eek:
Bravo to D-Tek for publishing more scientific data...:up:
This is the new curve they have published, at about 2 GPM, pressure drop is about 3 PSI, so it's a bit more restrictive than the V1.
http://www.dtekcustoms.com/ProductIm...erformance.jpg
Here is the old V1 curve they had published:
http://lib.store.yahoo.net/lib/sidew...uziongraph.gif
http://lib.store.yahoo.net/lib/sidew...uzionchart.gif
So it's about 36% more restrictive than the original curve.
And these were my own results of V1. From my own testing I recorded the V1 plus washer plus quad core nozzle to be about equal to their V2 curve.
http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/303...summaryto3.jpg
So it's a bit more restrictive, but I think it's a fair trade to seal that internal leak.:up:
Per the C/W data, at 2GPM the difference is .04C/W so for a 100 watt heat load the improvemnt would be .4C.
I'm just not sure what the original c/w curves were based on. I found the pressure drop curve that was posted for V1 actually was much closer to matching restriction similar to the V1 with washer than the V1 without washer, but my block was previously bowed, so I couldn't say for sure.
Trying to measure .4C differences on a block is pretty tricky though when you can have up to 2C error between mounts. It would take alot of testing mounts.
Everything effects the result, BTW I love your short answer, I feel better now...
I've seen this question asked a couple times with no answer given.
No, the Delrin sections of the v2 (internally and externally) are vastly different from the v1. The v1 has a solid mid plate that is also external whereas the mid plate on the v2 is completely internal.
Ahh... I got that wrong
At 2GPM
V1= .028
V2=.025
Difference = .003c/w
.003C/W x 100 watts = .3C
But the quads run up to 200 watts or so I've heard, so the gain could be more with those hotter quads. They also seem to have put some extra emphasis in that quad nozzle, so who knows how that does.