OPB Completed 8m and 32m WR for whole set pi & 5.7G x6800 WR

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

10-27-2006, 03:52 PM
Revv23

congratulations once again OPB!
10-27-2006, 04:06 PM
Onepagebook

Quote:

Originally Posted by nCrusader

Very nice OPB. How about some 3D?

will do , gotta take a rest for next step;)

REVV23, thank you for your support.;)
10-27-2006, 04:07 PM
dominick32

Let me tell you the 1m World Record was great.
But this record is absolutely incredible. May I ask when youre going to stop breaking records? lol :D

Congrats OPB...

Please send me PM about that 3-3-3-1 ram.... still waiting. :D
10-27-2006, 05:30 PM
cpulloverclock

Congrats OPB :toast:
10-27-2006, 05:48 PM
OMEGA3

Congratulations!!

8M broke the 2minutes at last.:toast:
Really awesome chip, and your driving!!
10-27-2006, 05:52 PM
NO1B4ME

Quote:

Originally Posted by Onepagebook

will do , gotta take a rest for next step;)

REVV23, thank you for your support.;)

Awesome Job OPB :toast: .
10-27-2006, 05:59 PM
dinos22

let's see what the quad will get up to :D
10-27-2006, 06:47 PM
Onepagebook

Thank you guys,
Omega-san
your skill of super pi is the most impressive one I have never seen.
I even need to clock higher than you 90mhz to get faster than you only 1.x seconds.!!

I just got the quad-core 6700 extreme,now install the OS, let's just wait and see what happen.:)
here are some pics, looks good, 1.4v 400x9 very easy directly boot from bios

http://www.teaminsano.com/opb/opbqx6700es/qx670001.jpg

http://www.teaminsano.com/opb/opbqx6700es/qx670002.jpg

http://www.teaminsano.com/opb/opbqx6700es/qx670003.jpg

http://www.teaminsano.com/opb/opbqx6700es/qx670004.jpg

http://www.teaminsano.com/opb/opbqx6700es/qx670005.jpg
10-27-2006, 07:46 PM
OMEGA3

Quote:

Originally Posted by Onepagebook

Thank you guys,
Omega-san
your skill of super pi is the most impressive one I have never seen.
I even need to clock higher than you 90mhz to get faster than you only 1.x seconds.!!

I just got the quad-core 6700 extreme,now install the OS, let's just wait and see what happen.:)
here are some pics, looks good, 1.4v 400x9 very easy directly boot from bios

Thanks OPB-san

Because I have the speed difference between B2 and B1, I think that it is normal.
However, the CPU-clock works enough to it in 8M or less.

The result of quad-core 6700 is the enjoyment.
Waiting good news about it too.

BTW,Try was done to 32M again.
It was possible to update it just a little.
10-27-2006, 09:28 PM
Onepagebook

Quote:

Originally Posted by OMEGA3

Thanks OPB-san

Because I have the speed difference between B2 and B1, I think that it is normal.
However, the CPU-clock works enough to it in 8M or less.

The result of quad-core 6700 is the enjoyment.
Waiting good news about it too.

BTW,Try was done to 32M again.
It was possible to update it just a little.

yup, exactly,
that day, I was running the 8m about 8 out of 10 times all failed @ 18th iteration(all got "not convert in SQR)..so took me lots of LN2, finally, figured the problem because I use too small amount of maxmem setting(384mb); so I use the maxmem back to 600mb and it works fine. After that, I had few amount of LN2 left to run 32m. I think I will run one time for 5.5g+ for 32m and see what happen.
I was thinking if we use too much or insuficient maxmem will seriously affect the benefit x6800 4mb.:)
10-27-2006, 10:13 PM
nCrusader

There's a difference between B1 and B2 in speed? How can that be?
10-27-2006, 10:37 PM
Onepagebook

Quote:

Originally Posted by nCrusader

There's a difference between B1 and B2 in speed? How can that be?

yes, I believe so. and it's not just a litte;)
10-27-2006, 10:47 PM
Dumo

Congrats for awesome wrs there OPB:toast:

Like you said....Dream it today, make it happens tonite:)
10-27-2006, 10:50 PM
hipro5

Yeap......well done ONCE AGAIN OPB.....:D :toast:
10-27-2006, 11:09 PM
charlie

:woot:

Very impressive.
10-27-2006, 11:22 PM
Punisher!

More than wonderful!
10-27-2006, 11:32 PM
Onepagebook

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dumo

Congrats for awesome wrs there OPB:toast:

Like you said....Dream it today, make it happens tonite:)

Not that fast bro, I mean that should be "tomorrow":D

Wow ...all the xip, xL here@@...thanks.

**@ master hipro5, I think whemn I was in the middle of testing that DDR maximizer, I killed my p5w64 and p5b dx wifi:(
10-27-2006, 11:53 PM
swarzy85

I think you should complete Pi 1M over 5.6Ghz

Great frequency ;)
10-28-2006, 12:27 AM
Onepagebook

Quote:

Originally Posted by swarzy85

I think you should complete Pi 1M over 5.6Ghz

Great frequency ;)

really?:)

If I tell you I can (actually I did), would you believe that? or you just came here and try to flame agin?
Maybe I should not say this, but the fact is that
Yes, I did say " when the moment I tried from 5500~5600mhz, I was really struggle@ 9.1..."
But let me ask you guys, is that just never has any way to get improve?
Sounds like once if you did something hit the wall,
then later you got improve then that better result will be fake or even a BS?
I truly sick of saying this, but that kinda of jealousy theory let me so disappointed about .
Personally, I do what I can do and work really hard to help anyone has question here,
basically I don't listen to whom just gives me
anything like "OPB you should do this or you don't prove anything, then you are fake.;)"
10-28-2006, 01:35 AM
uclajd

OPB, two things.

First, I think the quad core review deserves its own thread. :toast: I'd love to see how the quads do in video encoding versus the C2D's. :D

Second, what is the max air OC on your WR x6800? :confused:
10-29-2006, 06:10 AM
swarzy85

Quote:

Originally Posted by Onepagebook

really?:)

If I tell you I can (actually I did), would you believe that? or you just came here and try to flame agin?
Maybe I should not say this, but the fact is that
Yes, I did say " when the moment I tried from 5500~5600mhz, I was really struggle@ 9.1..."
But let me ask you guys, is that just never has any way to get improve?
Sounds like once if you did something hit the wall,
then later you got improve then that better result will be fake or even a BS?
I truly sick of saying this, but that kinda of jealousy theory let me so disappointed about .
Personally, I do what I can do and work really hard to help anyone has question here,
basically I don't listen to whom just gives me
anything like "OPB you should do this or you don't prove anything, then you are fake.;)"

I'm sorry my friend but probably your conscience is a little bit dirty.

I was stating only that your cpu should have completed Pi 1M over 5.6Ghz, so, probably, you would have lowered further your great record.

The tone of your post is absolutely out of context here ;)
Please pay attention at this.

No flame as been generated AGAIN by me. No proofs exist of what you are saying as far as I know; if you think something else, please point me out THE EXACT LINK, than I will beg your pardon.

You should, and you definitely should listen to opinions here, otherwise what's the reason to start a new thread in a PUBLIC FORUM?
If you do open new threads only for the sake of listening users clapping their hands at you please, do come in ;)

This is my second and last post here.
11-07-2006, 12:34 PM
ShiningArcanine

Would you run a 1M SuperPi benchmark? I am curious how quickly it would execute on a 5.7GHz Core 2 Duo X6800 Processor.
11-07-2006, 12:51 PM
massman

He did ... 8.906s
11-11-2006, 07:39 PM
hipogtr

Outstanding work. Thanx for all the pics.
11-11-2006, 11:07 PM
lukas69

very good
:)

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page