congratulations once again OPB!
Printable View
congratulations once again OPB!
will do , gotta take a rest for next step;)Quote:
Originally Posted by nCrusader
REVV23, thank you for your support.;)
Let me tell you the 1m World Record was great.
But this record is absolutely incredible. May I ask when youre going to stop breaking records? lol :D
Congrats OPB...
Please send me PM about that 3-3-3-1 ram.... still waiting. :D
Congrats OPB :toast:
Congratulations!!
8M broke the 2minutes at last.:toast:
Really awesome chip, and your driving!!
Awesome Job OPB :toast: .Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
let's see what the quad will get up to :D
Thank you guys,
Omega-san
your skill of super pi is the most impressive one I have never seen.
I even need to clock higher than you 90mhz to get faster than you only 1.x seconds.!!
I just got the quad-core 6700 extreme,now install the OS, let's just wait and see what happen.:)
here are some pics, looks good, 1.4v 400x9 very easy directly boot from bios
http://www.teaminsano.com/opb/opbqx6700es/qx670001.jpg
http://www.teaminsano.com/opb/opbqx6700es/qx670002.jpg
http://www.teaminsano.com/opb/opbqx6700es/qx670003.jpg
http://www.teaminsano.com/opb/opbqx6700es/qx670004.jpg
http://www.teaminsano.com/opb/opbqx6700es/qx670005.jpg
Thanks OPB-sanQuote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
Because I have the speed difference between B2 and B1, I think that it is normal.
However, the CPU-clock works enough to it in 8M or less.
The result of quad-core 6700 is the enjoyment.
Waiting good news about it too.
BTW,Try was done to 32M again.
It was possible to update it just a little.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMEGA3
yup, exactly,
that day, I was running the 8m about 8 out of 10 times all failed @ 18th iteration(all got "not convert in SQR)..so took me lots of LN2, finally, figured the problem because I use too small amount of maxmem setting(384mb); so I use the maxmem back to 600mb and it works fine. After that, I had few amount of LN2 left to run 32m. I think I will run one time for 5.5g+ for 32m and see what happen.
I was thinking if we use too much or insuficient maxmem will seriously affect the benefit x6800 4mb.:)
There's a difference between B1 and B2 in speed? How can that be?
Quote:
Originally Posted by nCrusader
yes, I believe so. and it's not just a litte;)
Congrats for awesome wrs there OPB:toast:
Like you said....Dream it today, make it happens tonite:)
Yeap......well done ONCE AGAIN OPB.....:D :toast:
:woot:
Very impressive.
More than wonderful!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumo
Not that fast bro, I mean that should be "tomorrow":D
Wow ...all the xip, xL here@@...thanks.
**@ master hipro5, I think whemn I was in the middle of testing that DDR maximizer, I killed my p5w64 and p5b dx wifi:(
I think you should complete Pi 1M over 5.6Ghz
Great frequency ;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by swarzy85
really?:)
If I tell you I can (actually I did), would you believe that? or you just came here and try to flame agin?
Maybe I should not say this, but the fact is that
Yes, I did say " when the moment I tried from 5500~5600mhz, I was really struggle@ 9.1..."
But let me ask you guys, is that just never has any way to get improve?
Sounds like once if you did something hit the wall,
then later you got improve then that better result will be fake or even a BS?
I truly sick of saying this, but that kinda of jealousy theory let me so disappointed about .
Personally, I do what I can do and work really hard to help anyone has question here,
basically I don't listen to whom just gives me
anything like "OPB you should do this or you don't prove anything, then you are fake.;)"
OPB, two things.
First, I think the quad core review deserves its own thread. :toast: I'd love to see how the quads do in video encoding versus the C2D's. :D
Second, what is the max air OC on your WR x6800? :confused:
I'm sorry my friend but probably your conscience is a little bit dirty.Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
I was stating only that your cpu should have completed Pi 1M over 5.6Ghz, so, probably, you would have lowered further your great record.
The tone of your post is absolutely out of context here ;)
Please pay attention at this.
No flame as been generated AGAIN by me. No proofs exist of what you are saying as far as I know; if you think something else, please point me out THE EXACT LINK, than I will beg your pardon.
You should, and you definitely should listen to opinions here, otherwise what's the reason to start a new thread in a PUBLIC FORUM?
If you do open new threads only for the sake of listening users clapping their hands at you please, do come in ;)
This is my second and last post here.
Would you run a 1M SuperPi benchmark? I am curious how quickly it would execute on a 5.7GHz Core 2 Duo X6800 Processor.
He did ... 8.906s
Outstanding work. Thanx for all the pics.
very good
:)