G80 to get 12K in 3Dmark 06

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

10-25-2006, 09:52 PM
syne_24

Quote:

Originally Posted by hipro5

X6800 overclocked @ 3600MHz (no tweaks-nothing) - 2 x 8800GTXs default = 15500Marks in 2k6.......BETA bioses - BETA Drivers = it's gonna be faster...
I think that these are some bad news for ATI for the time been.......Dumn it....:(

damn..at that rate the next milestone will be 20-25K in 3dm06!! :D
10-25-2006, 11:11 PM
milkcafe

the 8800GTX score is out

http://vic.expreview.com/attachment/1161835755.jpg
http://vic.expreview.com/attachment/1161835812.jpg

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=120598
10-26-2006, 01:20 AM
Razor_Sniper

Nice! :O
10-26-2006, 01:58 AM
zakelwe

I wonder if these will have cold bug with LN2 ?

Assuming the IHS has a good contact with the die it might be that the pots do quite well with such a large area to touch. Comments from LN2 guys on this ?

Regards

Andy
10-26-2006, 02:32 AM
|-jokker-|

Victor can i please ask for the sizes of the core ?
Great scores :)
10-26-2006, 03:21 AM
VictorWang

Quote:

Originally Posted by |-jokker-|

Victor can i please ask for the sizes of the core ?
Great scores :)

@.@ can only say...very big............

btw, default clk 3dmark06 with a qx6600es @ 3.6G, nearly 12k4

and... overclk a little bit @.@

http://vic.expreview.com/attachment/1161849814.jpg
10-26-2006, 06:10 AM
milkcafe

the quad core Kentsfield CPU power is horrible :slobber:

Core 2 Quad Kentsfield Q6600 @ 3600MHz (400x9)
3DMark06 CPU Score　5417 Marks

2x AMD Opteron(tm) 8220 SE processor @ 2800MHz
3DMark06 CPU Score　4782 Marks
10-26-2006, 09:51 AM
Blacklash

Victor,

We're definitely waiting on some 8800 GTX SLi action! BTW impressive score to say the least.
10-26-2006, 09:56 AM
perkam

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkcafe

the quad core Kentsfield CPU power is horrible :slobber:

Core 2 Quad Kentsfield Q6600 @ 3600MHz (400x9)
3DMark06 CPU Score　5417 Marks

2x AMD Opteron(tm) 8220 SE processor @ 2800MHz
3DMark06 CPU Score　4782 Marks

8220SE is mp proc...dp proc is supposed to be 2220 SE...

Difference? None...except price is double for 8220 proc as they're supposed be run in 4x8220se environment.

Perkam
10-26-2006, 12:54 PM
|-jokker-|

Quote:

Originally Posted by VictorWang

@.@ can only say...very big............

So as the time let you please could mesure that , thanks a lot for the response.

Great scores , but not at the point :P overclock that cpu :)
10-26-2006, 12:59 PM
Nanometer

He doesn't know how big it is because of the heat spreader. He can't take it off because of the simple fact. Removing the IHS will make the cooling system useless.
10-26-2006, 01:36 PM
Timmay

It also looks like the shim is Pop rivited in.
10-26-2006, 01:38 PM
Cpt Twitchy

http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/6949/5888tb7.jpg

IHS is also 43mm square
10-26-2006, 03:42 PM
syne_24

wow single card almost 14K, i'm impressed :)

sli g80 will hit 18-20K for sure and more with ln2..i bet kingpin is happy about this
10-26-2006, 04:55 PM
***Deimos***

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkcafe

the quad core Kentsfield CPU power is horrible :slobber:

Core 2 Quad Kentsfield Q6600 @ 3600MHz (400x9)
3DMark06 CPU Score　5417 Marks

2x AMD Opteron(tm) 8220 SE processor @ 2800MHz
3DMark06 CPU Score　4782 Marks

Not sure of that AMD score. But, Victor got 3216 on X6800. So, I think kentsfield 3.6ghz 5417 >> 2.93ghz 3216 is not so bad. Its not like anybody is actually expecting 3DMark2006 CPU score to scale linearly, right?
10-26-2006, 04:59 PM
***Deimos***

Quote:

Originally Posted by |-jokker-|

So as the time let you please could mesure that , thanks a lot for the response.

Great scores , but not at the point :P overclock that cpu :)

does it really matter? It could be 200mm^2, 300mm^2 or even 999mm^2. Doesn't matter because nVidia will produce relatively few for the hardcore enthusiast sector either way. The big surprise will be how well the architecture scales. (ie "How efficient is it")

If nVidia can get amazing compact 8800 design like 7600 out.. everything else will fall into place.
10-26-2006, 05:20 PM
rodman

One thing I find very interesting is how 3DMark takes advantage of 4 cores and the fact that 4 cores clocked slower than the X6800 gives higher graphics marks as well. Either 3Dmark is taking advantage of Quad core or something else. It's as if you have 2 cores on cpu duty and 2 cpus on graphics duty.

I wonder if 4 cores will help that much in gaming? Not becouse the game was threaded for 4 cores but more along the lines of 4 cores working with the 8800GTX

Oh and I wonder how much of a boost Quad core will give in SLI;)
10-26-2006, 07:19 PM
***Deimos***

Quote:

Originally Posted by rodman

One thing I find very interesting is how 3DMark takes advantage of 4 cores and the fact that 4 cores clocked slower than the X6800 gives higher graphics marks as well. Either 3Dmark is taking advantage of Quad core or something else. It's as if you have 2 cores on cpu duty and 2 cpus on graphics duty.

I wonder if 4 cores will help that much in gaming? Not becouse the game was threaded for 4 cores but more along the lines of 4 cores working with the 8800GTX

Oh and I wonder how much of a boost Quad core will give in SLI;)

3D graphics is very parallelizable. Thats why GPUs with increasing numbers of pipelines scale so well. However, 3D pipeline is also serial progression of calculations: vertices->geometry->t&L->ps->rendering etc... and thus also relies on serial CPU control and assignment of work/data.

Example. First you need to update the world (ie your BF2 dude ran forward).. send stuff to GPU to do, it will do all the polygons and pixels, output frame and then you can work on next one. CPU cant work on like 10 frames in the future.. it obviously doesnt know where you moves the mouse, what keys you pressed, and what other multiplayers have done... etc

So, typically I think when game developers talk about multi-threading, I think they mean more along the lines of doing pre-fetching in seperate thread, or AI or any other non graphics pipeline stuff. Thus the benefits of multi-core CPUs in games are probably never going to be quite as good as imagined.
10-26-2006, 08:58 PM
G H Z

That is one powerful card. Victor what are the max clocks you have reached with it so far?
10-26-2006, 09:42 PM
ahmad

14k single card.. thats very impressive.
10-26-2006, 11:45 PM
milkcafe

the Kentsfield XE wont be the most powerful CPU in 2007

the Clovertown ,Tulsa Xeon ,Yorkfield XE and AMD Altair K8L will be faster:rolleyes:

AMD Athlon(tm) FX57 @ 4208 MHz (210x20) single core
3DMark06 CPU Score 1696 Marks
http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/9243/cpu42089kx.jpg

Intel Pentium M 780 2MB L2cache @ 4000 MHz (266.6x15) single core
3DMark06 CPU Score 1713 Marks

Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Solo E6600 @ 4050MHz (450x9) single core
3DMark06 CPU score　1753 Marks

Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800 4MB L2cache 2.93GGHz 2x core
3DMark06 CPU score　2512
http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images...a7RG_2_2_l.gif

Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo E6600 @ 3150MHz (350x9) 2x core
3DMark06 CPU score　2727

AMD Athlon(tm) FX62 @ 3676 MHz 2x core
3DMark06 CPU Score 2787 Marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=329639

Intel Core Duo T2600 @ 3516 MHz 2x core
3DMark06 CPU Score 2874 Marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=303322

Intel Pentium 965XE @ 6172 MHz 4x core
3DMark06 CPU Score 3314 Marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=86920

AMD 2x Opteron 275 @ 2797 MHz 4x core
3DMark06 CPU Score 3824 Marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=91145

Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Extreme X6800 @ 5058 MHz 2x core
3DMark06 CPU score 4387 Marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=440284

Intel XEON 5160M @ 3000MHz (Woodcrest 3.0GHz 4MB L3cache ) 2x core
3DMark06 CPU Score 4570 Marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=501026

2x AMD Opteron(tm) 8220 SE processor @ 2800MHz 4x core
3DMark06 CPU Score　4782 Marks

Intel(R) Core 2 Quado Kentsfield Q6600 @ 3600MHz (400x9) 4x core
3DMark06 CPU score 5417 Marks
http://vic.expreview.com/attachment/1161849814.jpg

Intel(R) Xeon(R) Clovertown 2.66GHz (2x Intel Woodcrest Xeon 5150 CPU) 4x core
3DMark06 CPU score 5581 Marks
http://img180.imageshack.us/img180/5765/3dmarkkk6.jpg

AMD Athlon(tm) FX8x (Altair) 2.93 MHz (4x512KB L2cache + 2MB L3cache) 4x core
3DMark06 CPU score ???? Marks

Intel Core 2 Quado QX6700 Kentsfield 8MB L2cache @ 4104MHz 4x core
3DMark06 CPU Score　6057 Marks
http://www.tyrou.net/screens/12856-3d06.png

Intel(R) Xeon(R) 7140M (Tulsa 3.40GHz 16MB L3cache ) 4x core
3DMark06 CPU score　7824 Marks

Intel Core 2 Quado Yorkfield XE 3.73GHz 2x6MB L2cache 4x core
3DMark06 CPU Score　????? Marks
10-27-2006, 12:51 AM
Dumo

Borrowd from VW....Comparo to CF...

http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/3...shot150vx0.jpg

http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/9...shot149zt3.jpg
10-27-2006, 01:22 AM
ANP !!!

:slobber: :slobber: :slobber: :slobber:
10-27-2006, 02:57 AM
ahmad

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dumo

Borrowd from VW....Comparo to CF...

[img]http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/3797/screenshot150vx0.jpg[-/img]

[img]http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/9112/screenshot149zt3.jpg[-/img]

But!

CPU scores are quite different. 3400 vs 5400.
10-27-2006, 03:01 AM
ewitte

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkcafe

the Kentsfield XE wont be the most powerful CPU in 2007

the Clovertown ,Tulsa Xeon ,Yorkfield XE and AMD Altair K8L will be faster:rolleyes:

Yorkfield is my quad core upgrade. I'm just sticking with Conroe when Kentsfield comes out.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page