X6800 B2 #2, ModPI1.5 1M result and 8M,16M,32M WR Update By OMEGA(TeamJapan)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OMEGA3

Thanks a lot.:toast:

It has not done yet though it is thought that tries by 4:5 of 4-4-3-X.
Would be try next run...

---

excellent i reckon we'll see an even faster time easy :cool: :woot:

awesome result Omega-san, Congrats:)
but you might need to have back up 32m score...j/K
I will give a run tomorrow, since I know how to get p5wdg2ws pro and p5w64 ws pro going over 1.72v without OVP;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Onepagebook

awesome result Omega-san, Congrats:)
but you might need to have back up 32m score...j/K
I will give a run tomorrow, since I know how to get p5wdg2ws pro and p5w64 ws pro going over 1.72v without OVP;)

---

Thanks a lot!! :toast:

Yeah, pleasure waiting that...
Would be try again,
But,may be near limit of my chip.

Good luck for your next run!!
Also waiting good news to break the 9sec.:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OMEGA3

Thanks a lot!! :toast:

Yeah, pleasure waiting that...
Would be try again,
But,may be near limit of my chip.

Good luck for your next run!!
Also waiting good news to break the 9sec.:)

---

yup,
I still can't figure out why your 16m is slow a lot compare with other 1m, 8m and 32m run; if you got chance, you can adjust trfc to 24~25 range and see what happen, sometimes it might not need to be as tight as possible to fit the best performance.:)

My best Regard,

OPB

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Onepagebook

yup,
I still can't figure out why your 16m is slow a lot compare with other 1m, 8m and 32m run; if you got chance, you can adjust trfc to 24~25 range and see what happen, sometimes it might not need to be as tight as possible to fit the best performance.:)

My best Regard,

OPB

---

Hi OPB-san

Thanks, I was felt like so...
16M speed of 5290MHz and 5350MHz doesn't change,
and it looks like it though there is a slowing phenomenon when CPU limit is just near.

Last time, it was not loosened enough though tRFC was loosened a little.
Moreover, I want to try variously.

All the best!!

非常に印象的! 私達とこれを共有することありがとう!


私の悪い日本語を許しなさい

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BobyTT

非常に印象的! 私達とこれを共有することありがとう!


私の悪い日本語を許しなさい

---

Thanks!!:toast:

No problem, The meaning is understood well.;)
If the problem can be shared even a little, it is glad...

X6800 B2, LN2 cooling, By OMEGA

4M: 55.891s, 5362.2MHz

Tried again 16M today and yesterday.
However, the clock was not raised well and slow.
4:5, 4-3-4-4 were not able to be used by even though it tried at x12.
It was not good this time....:(

M/B: ASUS P5WDH deluxe
CPU: X6800 B2 Retail L623A465
CPU Cooling: LN2
Memory: Team Xtreem PC2-5300 1GB x2
VGA: MilleⅡ PCI
HDD: HDS722580VLAT20
Power Supply: Zippy-460SATA
Vcore: 1.875V, Vdimm: 2.70V, Vmch: 1.90V, Vfsb: 1.60V, Vio: 3.60V (all actual)
OS: Windows Server 2003
MEM: 3-3-3-1
CopperPot：OMEGA SpecialⅢ（Bottom plate 30mm）＋spider
Grease：Ceramique by Arctic Silver

4M:WR
http://bird.zero.ad.jp/~zan89925/55.891.jpg

Omedetougozaimasu, Omega-san for 4M result. :toast:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OMEGA3

may be near limit of my chip

---

I know you can get more out of that... ;)

@sierra_bound

Thanks a lot!!
David-san, Congrats to your 32M update.


@Death^Dread

I also hope for a thing so.;)


:toast:

尊重 Omega-san

Congrats, again an awesome score from you!!!!!!!! ^_^

Try 557 4:5 4-4-3-4, better perfs than 446 3-3-3-1 :) I don't know if the P5W DH will want that...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

尊重 Omega-san

Congrats, again an awesome score from you!!!!!!!! ^_^

Try 557 4:5 4-4-3-4, better perfs than 446 3-3-3-1 :) I don't know if the P5W DH will want that...

---

Hi cpulloverclock-san

Many thanks!!:toast:

Yes, I also think that 4:5 is faster...
Did not run well this time.
It was shutdown at around 532(MemClock) when run with 4:5.

Would be try it again.:)