I had a set of elpida generic sticks and it was great.
I had mine to 800 4-4-4-12 at only 2.2v. This was on a Nforce 4 intel edition board which had no expanded timings that i could play with.
Printable View
I had a set of elpida generic sticks and it was great.
I had mine to 800 4-4-4-12 at only 2.2v. This was on a Nforce 4 intel edition board which had no expanded timings that i could play with.
May not bad but what is DDR800 if the board can reach FSB 530? And 2.2V aren't that good. G.Skill PC6400 2GBHZ (Rev. 0605 or higher) can reach DDR1066 @ 4-4-4-5 1T 2.3V (and more) if I remember exactly. Running them synchron on that board would just be so nice. :banana: Of course this board has some asyncron features, but why not?
Even if the memory perfomrance is mediocre, the async cpu clocking is gonna be a real hit.
I want the async but an overclocked cpu needs its bandwidth especially with two cores, it'll still be good as alot of apps are single thread still
i can't wait till somebody here at XS gets to board and starts working his magic on it.
i sure hope DFI doesnt let us down here
:D Hm, just read about RD600 in a german forum.
There is said RD600 it is meant to be the first chipset RAM works totaly undependent from the FSB.
So You can set the mem always to max. specs without losing bandwith no matter what CPU speed is chosen.
Hope this is true.............., would be a great improvement. :banana:
:confused: :confused: http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/mainboa...925143458.html
:bs: - nice promo trick...........Quote:
Originally Posted by Unseen
Diamond Flower Information :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Unseen
Quote:
Originally Posted by camouflage
Its not the first, ATI have done this before with their chipsets just none of those boards were compatible with Conroe
The Nforce chipset on the Asus board also does this Iam told
Thats actually true only it's Diamond Flower, Inc. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by zert
isn't it Design for Innovation :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by G H Z
lol no thats just a catchline
:slapass::D Hm, spend ~500 € hence one week one two 775 mobos - but this would be a reason to go bankrupt in October............... :slapass:Quote:
Originally Posted by 775911
Quote:
Originally Posted by G H Z
Exactly his point, xbit doesnt even have the name of the company right... how credible can that be?
http://www.google.com/search?client=...=Google+Search
Interesting...
Whats interesting there?
Eny informatio of memory bandwidth?:confused:
I believe that's their new one, it used to be Diamond Flower ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by zert
That RD600 looks sweet cant wait for its arival
Sorry, but did I miss something?Quote:
Originally Posted by pcmoddingmy
Im tired of waiting for a review, if DFI expects to sell this they should remove the NDA and let someone review the board. Sick of 'RD600 looking good' or 'Something wicked coming this way - RD600' on other forums. :mad:
An NDA isn't holding reviews back....they're just not ready to be sold yet and no revision is out to reviewers (and final revision isn't out to anybody yet). Very early versions may be in the hands of a few, and an NDA may be protecting those, but a preview of those may not represent the final version AT ALL.....RD600 hasn't been available for very long (only ES RD600s), and Oskar is probably still tweaking this thing. IIRC, he was having problems with it being kind of slow, clock-for-clock.
:D You can cut my arms and my legs - then I will order this board with my tongue........ :woot:
I'm hoping that DFI is waiting to make sure the board is actually complete and most major bugs removed before we get it. I'd rather wait an extra month now instead of being pissed off later. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by maxxxxel