It means 65nm is still on track, that's what it means.
It means 65nm is still on track, that's what it means.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DilTech
This thread was started with the header AMD65n in oct or next month.
Do you stand behind that?
yesQuote:
Originally Posted by Turtle 1
Well than Ghost I will not say another word on this subject till 1st. of nov.;)Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ghost
Are you sure, you know you have been confused about this type of thing before, remember when you said am2 would vastly outpace a 939 system because amd showed you one but it turned out that it was actually a k8l they showed you lolQuote:
Originally Posted by The Ghost
Or maybe we could be seeing another one of your predictions fall on its arse
Credibility
The ghost < the inquirer
ahh , yes , must be your favorite hobby . i did not say who was getting the 65nm cpu's from amd , amd is already making 65nm opterons , as provided by tyhe link supplied , if you had looked at it , you would have seen that , so you see it is not my credibilty that is hanging in the wind , it is the asian general managerQuote:
Originally Posted by gallag
i would expect oems to get all 65nm first , including dell
Small update, tier 2 partners still havent got their 65nm from latest revision the are still waiting so if they dont have it i would be hard that they will come out to oems or retail
he's still around......can't resist it hehehQuote:
Originally Posted by LowRun
Oh, high hopes here for 65nm AMD. There was big leap in overclockability when intel went 65... C'mon AMD!!!!