Quote:
Originally Posted by 3oh6
read the thread before you insult someone, hes got validation and a valid pi checksum
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3oh6
read the thread before you insult someone, hes got validation and a valid pi checksum
why do i bother...thanx for your input mate ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Revv23
again and i quote from my first post...
i thought i was simply stating that there is definitely going to be skepticism when you don't have the right proof and it is understandable. that is is, that is all. insult??? draw me a map because i am lost my firend...Quote:
Originally Posted by 3oh6
Quote:
Originally Posted by vintage_guitar
It's not listed! :slapass:
sorry for my english, but i don't understand...
first post i see the motrherboard rev. is c2 but in the next screenshot the motherboard rev is c1
does he test two different motherboard?
All world record in here are jealous of him. Give him a bravo!! :toast:
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoner
your right it does say C2....
hhmmm i dont think i recall seeing anyone else with screenshots saying Rev C2...
glitch in cpu-z ?
if this is real (im starting to believe) then congrats!! awesome work!
With the addition of validation I am compelled to render my apology. Great OC man!
with stock cooling,very impressive
:toast:
With stock cooling, stock board with no mods. I fully understand the super loose timings and only running single channel but its still pretty damn freakish. I wonder what fsb he can achieve with a retail 6600 or 6400.
So what is the final verdict on the validity of his results?
Who Cares!!!
Very clever way to get the most FSB, funny nobody else thought of one stick all loose timings with a 6X multiplier. It was right in front of everyones noses but nobody else thought of trying it, salute and congrats on being the first to succeed.
I still dont buy it...
any questionable OC, is not a WR to me, and most likely never will be.
theres just too many if, ands, or buts, with this one.
wow you guys are slow check this out from coolaler's thread his pic is from here
http://img10.picsplace.to/15/600-pi.JPG
no lets see this guys pic is from where now
http://img10.picsplace.to/15/600-pi.JPG
am i the only one that noticed this?
no way in hell 2 systems with the same timings and speed are going to do the exact same time for a superpi run.
why is it both check sums for coolaler's and this guys superpi calcs are the same?
hell all the SS's in this post are from the same location as coolaler's.
coolaler's SS"s are in the first post
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=114600
then see this guys post here
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...4&postcount=34
VOTE BAN
YES=F1
NO= you have no option for NO!
coolaler didnt get that record. its the same because its the same guy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilsizer
if i press F1 i get mozzilla fire fox help?:mad:anyway drop it guys. if it is fake he is only fooling himself;)
didn't know thatQuote:
Originally Posted by serious1
guess i'll hit No option and see what happens heheh
Mmmm...and if OPB/Macci/OPPainter/Coolaler etc were to rock on here with the same "evidence", everyone would believe?Quote:
without validation... it's NO WR. cpu-z verification, ORB verification... that's needed. Otherwise, waste of bandwidth. We've seen it ALL here before.
Guys, give him a break. This place is really full of so-called extremists when it comes to overclocking, yet mostly 1-2% of people on this site has really taken things to the extreme. Sad really to see the face of this wonderful forum change :(
Thing is, we all become so important to ourselves, we believe we are God's gift to the overclocking scene - when, in reality, it has nothing to do with us!
It's all about how lucky you are to get very good yield hardware.
Anyone out there with a few braincells can learn a few tricks on how to benchmark, and tune a system - it's nothing.
You are as good as your hardware allows you to be - because you are no1 or no2 or something doesn't make you a god, or someone special - just someone very fortunate to be receiving good hardware ;)
So, let's all tap down on those egos and allow someone else a little "respect" if and when applicable?
For the record, I have numerous times being in the top 10 in the open class on the Orb, with my own money, and hardware bought from Resellers.
Does that make me someone special? Nope, not at all. Just lucky to have some funds to invest in a hobby I luv.
Can mostly ANY person on this forum be as good as the so-called Greats?
Well, give us the cherry-picked hardware, and let's see, shall we then. I would say yes, all that mostly distinghuish no1 from no50 is good hardware, and funds. Not knowledge.
I bet there is the opportunity for the Dinos22, Eva2000's, heck quite many guys all over the world to be No1 with right hardware.
Damn, it's nothing special. The hardware may be, but not us as individuals - there's many, many overclockers in this world that can step into no1 today given same support with privileged hardware/bioses etc.
So, as a request, before judging this record, give the guy a break, shall we? Allow him the same time and courtesy to come up with results, before flaming/banning etc.
These actions are usually as a direct result of those that feel insecure in their own knowledge, and abilites - just because you can't do it, or whoever is no1 can't do it, doesn't mean the original poster can't.
Just a bit of food for thought.
:flowers:
I agree with you MrBean.
peace out.
why the hell would he be banned? coolaler even said himself he posted that same thing on his website??truth hurts i guess?
mr.bean
while your post does make some good points (it's all about the silicone+persistance+skill baby :D) you fail to realise that these forums are based on trust and respect. So when you do see someone like macci or fugger and many well respected members here post something even they go through the lengths of providing those details requested. It's not a big deal if you have nothing to hide. Even if fugger was to show up with a 600MHz screenshot like this and no further details i would not doubt him as consequences of lying on these forums are far greater than short lived reward such as a W.R. and other extraordinary claims. Members that have been here for a long time value their place in the community to the extent that they would never cheat and if they did they know very well what will happen in return.
New people with 1 post count showing up for a W.R. or some extraordinary claim are not new here so a certain degree of scepticism is healthy as long as it doesn't become a sledging match. It's childish and stupid of people to simply say others are jelaous. I had my doubts about this as there was no decent amount of info available to prove the claim beyond reasonable doubt. Now that we do have a CPUz validation and checksum this certainly looks more believable. I did make a note that faking CPUz is easily done and checksum can be arranged at certain clock speed to fit this....................so that's why many people are still a little doubtful that's all. If the thread starter put enough effort to join XS, create a thread, do all the screens so far than why not do the others people have asked him. It's not a big deal.
I'll give you an example when i was first putting out a thread with an unlocked 11xmulti on Opteron 146. I knew there were other threads and people not believing that so i made damn well sure i answer every question and do whatever people ask of me..........it wasn't a big deal. Look at that thread link and see how simple questions from people like S7 resulted in really long replays.............i had nothing to hide. People probably didn't doubt me too much as I've been very active here but I felt it was necessary to provide info required regardless. Imagine how different that thread would have been if i created another logon and created the first thread which just had the screenshot and that's it
I was wondering the same thingQuote:
Originally Posted by vintage_guitar
You all act like he's the new guy to your school and gets all the attention from the girls...then you get jelaous and want to kick his ass:stick: :slapass:
Hey Dinos22,Quote:
Originally Posted by Dinos22
Even though my postcount is very low, I have been a member of this site for quite many years :) Just haven't been that active over here, as there are many sites to browse/reply etc.
I am well aware of the "requirements" of some of these sites, but just recently the face of overclocking has started to change all over the world, with many newbies to overclocking making big inroads into territories usually the playground of more established names.
I have myself been in the top 10 numerous times, when the Macci/Fugger/OPP/Shamino's etc were very active, I have always enjoyed decent competition, and took what most guys presented at face value.
It will be very difficult to bull:banana::banana::banana::banana: an accomplished overclocker, and I have seen no evidence from the original poster of that intent.
In actual fact, I think with a good yield chipset, running single chan mem, at dividers, it may very well be feasible, even quite believable.
I would believe that clock, because for one simple fact - look at what his SuperPI time is, and start doing tests yourself with single chan mem, and reverse-polate your times with what dual-channel setup would give you at certain speeds, dividers, etc, vs single-channel setup.
Then quite a few will discover that indeed his times tie up with clocks and single channel.
Sometimes all that's needed is a little thinking.
My point is that this is becoming an increasing unfriendly place, with too many spectators waiting to play referee.
But yes, let's hope this is just a phase, and that we would be mature enough to accept, and understand when someone has accomplished something special, like in this case, and that we can give credit.
Sometimes you don't need all the proof in the world to accept a record like this, all you need is to use the gray matter so many claim to have an excess of :)
Not aimed at you, just in general.
Kind regards,
MrBean.
congrats :toast: