Sweet. Update us when you get it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brahmzy
Printable View
Sweet. Update us when you get it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brahmzy
I played around with these things a bit, and got them to play a little. I didn't have time to fully test stability, I will try that soon.
vdimm - 2.2v
Memory Performance Enhance - Fast (Based on suggestion from fyleow)
http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/9630/ddr21000fq7.jpg
Anyone running these sticks without a fan blowing over them? My set get errors without active cooling. =\
No fan on mine. I run them at stock speeds with 2.0vdimm.Quote:
Originally Posted by zoob
Well i'll update my status here as well. From my other thread:
Quote:
Originally Posted by WesM63
Quote:
Originally Posted by WesM63
No fan either, but have good case airflow.Quote:
Originally Posted by zoob
Memory run perfectly fine.
That's good news - I hope next week I'll be happy with my RMA too. Did they send the same stuff or the rev. 2 stuff?Quote:
Originally Posted by WesM63
Quote:
Originally Posted by fyleow
That might have been me, good to hear you are able to OC stable on the DS3. I haven't had a chance to OC yet, but I'll be keeping my vdimm on 2.0v for now.
newest beta BIOS for Asus P5B deluxe : 0605
1. Fix Kentsfield CPU incorrect issue
2. Add patch for OCZ2G8002GK-6400
3. Add patch S3 suspend function not stable when CPU FSB over 300MHz
Somebody w/p5b dlx tell me if this bios help something.....
LINK: http://www.computerbase.de/forum/att...3&d=1156408024
I would definitely not try that BIOS until it's on Asus' ftp. One XS member said it hosed TWO of his Windows installs.
Finally had some time to play a bit with my E6600 and this memory.
With 2:3 divider, I can run them at 850Mhz. After that, it fail with memtest.
But my problem is all divider give me problem.
1:1 with 300Mhz FSB (600Mhz memory) = error in memtest
1:1 with 400Mhz FSB (800Mhz memory) = error again
3:4 with 300Mhz FSB (800Mhz memory) = same errors
4:5 with 300Mhz FSB (750Mhz memory) = once again errors
I tried CL 4-5-4-15 and 5-6-6-15. Most of the time, memory won't boot when set by SPD and need a cmos clearing. Voltage is set to 2.1V.
So basicly, I can't overclock with this memory. (unless you call a 180Mhz an overclock...)
Will see if it's the memory or the Bios, but I'm disappointed so far.
ok guys im going to help you along as you are all trying to get clocks out of some of your dimms they just will not do.
First off the old 800 gold and the old 800 plat rev1 are Elpida based, they clock well async but not so good sync....so what does this mean.
1:1 you will see 350ish maybe 370, async on a good pair 500+
The plat rev2's are not Elpida based, being honest i have been told not to say what they are but I will say they are not micron either...please don't speculate as I ain't going to tell and they are all OCZ branded.
The plat rev2's will do 1:1 better than the older rev1's, some are doing 430 to 450...many do 400+ with ease.
Now, im seeing peeps buying rev1's and RMAing for rev2's...please buy what you want in the first instance, knowingly buying a product for an upgrade from us will only have us cutting support back. We have supported many users who were having serious issues as many of the boards had very immature bios files, these files are now getting better and 1:1 is improving a little...this means you may RMA 800golds and get the same ram back...
So if you want to buy OCZ and you want 1:1 of 400fsb+ then the plat rev2's are what you want...OR look at the other modules in the plat range that are Micron based. If you are happy with the upclock ratio's the the golds will do you just fine ;)
Also we found why 4x512 will work better than 2x1024...chip selsect....some boards are not doing it so well ;)
Finally if you want monster 1:1, VX2, the new 8500 or the 8000GEEK, 7200EPP...all high yield micron...
The rev 2 would not go anywhere near 1:1 on a FSB of 400 for me, well it would boot to windows, but completely unstable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony
I had to return your RAM and get the G-Skill HZ to acheive this stabaly, so my experience with the revision 2, stay the hell away from it also, go with the good micron based stuff, and you will be hassle free.
I just told you what dimms are mircon based...and you choose to run Gskill???Quote:
Originally Posted by linflas
I have tested the plat rev2's to well over 450, most of the issues are still bios related as to why users are not seeing high clocks with them.
Micron is super tollerant to tight timings the board covertly set...I suggest all users should set timings in windows and clock up in windows also to see if the bios is the limitation.
Tony,
I agree 100% on this statement. I will say I didn't know this was the case with mine until you and other OCZ employees told me so.
Don't screw up OCZ great support by doing this guys.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony
Well I guess I am lucky, my rev1's will do 400FSB+ 1:1 without problems. But I have to say, if they didn't, I would be RMA'ing as well. I do not see why PC6400 RAM not being able to run 400FSB 1:1 should be acceptable?
Not trying to flame, and I really appreciate the fact that an OCZ rep participates in this forum to help out their customers.
Just my $0.02 ;)
I agree on both counts. I bought PC6400 rated to run 4-5-4-15 @2.1V and no where was it mentioned that it only works in async mode. If it had been, I would have bought different ram. Now I have to wonder whether my borderline stability with Orthos large FFTs is being caused by this Rev. 1. Time for more testing. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by idiotec
Edit: Testing completed. My OCZ ram is fine. It's my E6400 that doesn't want to do 3.2GHz without a big Vcore boost. The ram is rated 4-5-4-15 @2.1V but does 4-4-4-12 @2.0V. I can't complain for the price.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony
Yes I did, as I did not find your support too helpful in my case.
I am speaking of my experience, I know from reading your post's on these forums, that you are nothing but helpful, and I wish the OCZ I bought had been out of the box stable at the FSB I wanted to run. Unfortunately it was not.
I went with the G.Skill because many people in this forum had had great luck with it, and I was able to acheive the speeds I wanted out of the box without adjustment.
I come to these forums to learn, so I do not have to tinker with my system for days and weeks on end to gain stability. I like getting a little more out of my system then what I paid for, but I do not like spending all my time tinkering to acheive stability.
I want to use my computer for what I bought it for, encoding, gaming, and general use, not spend all my time trying to tweak it, I have little enough free time to do what I like to do, I do not want it occupied with the hassle of stabalizing something.
This is just my opinion on the subject.
Mine runs perfectly at 412mhz fsb at 4,5,4,15 at 2.1v and passes all ortho tests with flying colors. After I managed to figure out what I needed to do on my own to get it to work in this motherboard. This is the Rev.1 memory. Well I got the go to bed now. Later.
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=114749
ok so I read this whole thread twice(actually skimmed I guess). Can someone specify the difference AGAIN between the rev. 1 and rev 2 platinum xtc 6400 EL's?
Do I have to pop open cpu-z and look at the spd timings, or can I tell by physically looking at the heatspreaders.
The SPD timings on the sticker of the heatspreader says: 4-5-4-15.
i've had pretty good luck so far i believe compared some users.
using a DS3 and e6300. i was able to achieve 450 or ddr900 1:1 using 2.3v. But my timings were 5-5-5, i did not try 4-4-4. I haven't tried using a lower voltage or higher fsb. I just wanted to pop the memory in, while I had a chance to use the board and chip. But I was able to sp2004 large ftt's for 6hrs before I had to give it back.
Anyways, are these rev 1 or 2?
My 4200's can get up to around 400MHz benchable (not fully stable though) with two sticks. With 4 sticks I can't get it stable at default speeds.
Rev. 1 is rated 4-5-4-15 and Rev. 2 is 4-4-4-12. Rev. 1 uses Elpida chips and OCZ isn't saying what chips are on Rev. 2.
this is written on the sticker on the heatspreader? correct?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred_Pohl
Too right... running the RAM async puts less stress on it right? So how can you rate RAM for 400MHz, if it can't actually cope with a 400MHz FSB?!Quote:
Originally Posted by idiotec
If they can only do 350MHz ish, maybe they should be rebranded as DDR2-700 :stick:
You know, there are more dividers than that. Some boards only have upclocking dividers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sumanji