nubs :rolleyes: :fact:Quote:
Originally Posted by Silves
Printable View
nubs :rolleyes: :fact:Quote:
Originally Posted by Silves
:with:Quote:
Originally Posted by Silves
Personally, I run around 100mhz lower than my Orthos stable speeds daily. I don't get why people think running on the brink of instability makes you a bigger man. I just don't want to put up with any BS during gaming or anything else I do normally, so why introduce the risk for an extra 50 or 100MHz more?
Of course when benching my mentality spins 180 degrees.
BIOS - 1201
FSB - 371*9
VCORE - 1.37V :woot:
MEMS - 928MHZ 4-4-4-4
VDIMM - 2.0V
VALIDATION:
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=117433
http://img119.imageshack.us/img119/8812/sp3pt8.jpg
FSB/DRAM 1:1 how do u set that in bios?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joor
Lowering the ram multi.
BIOS - 1305
CPU - 3708MHZ (412*9)
VCORE - 1.5V
http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/4415/1xy3.jpg
Again, just to reinforce what the other guys are saying. SuperPI is bull:banana::banana::banana::banana:, it's not a stability tester but a performance benchmark. ORTHOS is stability testing.
My air cooled E6600 can do 3.9 SuperPI:
http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/1...pi1mlv5.th.png
But needs quite a bit of voltage for 3.6 ORTHOS:
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/7...os9hfn7.th.png
I wouldn't call anything under 4hours ORTHOS stable.
well...sombrio proved 24/7 stability right there...nice results for a week 24 chip. You got really lucky.
Yes he did prove it, I was just making a point of the difference between SPI stable and ORTHOS stable.
mine's a Week 26 chip BTW. :)
people who know anything about stress testing knows that 1mb superpi is not a strong indicator of system stability.
i dont see where he claims stability in that last post with the superPi screenshot at 3.7GHZ... but he proved the 24 hours of Orthos at 3.3GHZ.
You can try rendering a big/complex scene in Mental Ray/VRay for stability also :p:
:eek: what week is that chip??Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnMike
why are you so stoked on a 3.3ghz e6600? Most E6400s do that with ease
Another one...
http://img117.imageshack.us/img117/8211/1ft3.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by sombrio
:nono:Quote:
Date/Time has changed during..
Quote:
Originally Posted by K.I.T.T.
HA HA! Nice catch! 24 Hour Prime stable my ass!
Yeah, on a 965 board. My 6600 at 3.4 on my P5WDH performs better then many of the 63-6400's I've seen at 3.6-3.7 on p5b's.......Quote:
Originally Posted by BottomsUp
No, "stable" by definition means proper function. So if a computer boots and never crashes/works perfectly, it is stable. Notice there is nothing in the word "stable" thatQuote:
Originally Posted by M.Beier
refers to what software is being run.