Danke pc ice.
Hows da lizzard I see ya holding?
Printable View
Danke pc ice.
Hows da lizzard I see ya holding?
lol :p:
hows are those high voltages? whats your max vdimm now, 3.5v? does modding the 3.3v line alone increase the vdimm voltage by the same level you raise the 3.3v line?
2.8 in bios=2.9vdimm
would 2.8 in bios and 3.3v line@3.4v equal in 3.0vdimm?
oh right i forgot your on an cw
Hell Fire maybe I've read over it, but @ what voltage runs that Barton 2505.69Mhz out of the box? :D
I got myself a DangerDen WC kit (Maze4 and NB and GPU block) and so I'd like a new cpu to torture... getting a bit tired of this 1700+ :P
I don't get it, my efficiency seems to be very low, around 95-96%.
If i see others here and see that most have around 98% i'm wondering what i'm doing wrong.
I'm running dual channel, timings are 11-2-2-2.0, and CPU interface is enabled.
My mem is 2x256 Twinmos winbond BH-5.
WTF?
The higher the cpu clock the higher the effiency. That's easy. At least these are my experiences... But maybe the nb is limiting us too.Quote:
Originally posted by Zeus
I don't get it, my efficiency seems to be very low, around 95-96%.
If i see others here and see that most have around 98% i'm wondering what i'm doing wrong.
I'm running dual channel, timings are 11-2-2-2.0, and CPU interface is enabled.
My mem is 2x256 Twinmos winbond BH-5.
WTF?
That's not all, some other parameters influence the bandwidth score asking me.Quote:
Originally posted by SAE
The higher the cpu clock the higher the effiency. That's easy. At least these are my experiences... But maybe the nb is limiting us too.
For instance take a look at page #1 of this thread, and look at the bandwith of Starck, he's got 3523Mbs with only 10,5x225.
That's quite a bit more than mine and mine is at higher clock speeds....why? :(
memory timings?
Nope, 11-2-2-2.0 seems to be the fastest settings for Nforce 2 chipsets.Quote:
Originally posted by saaya
memory timings?
I'm leaning towards the idea that it has something to do with memory quality....:confused:
Hmm. Could be... my efficiency ain't as high as 98% :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally posted by Zeus
I'm leaning towards the idea that it has something to do with memory quality....:confused:
The mem needs to be perfectly stable, you need high cpu Mhz and thight timings. Then you will get 98%. I got it this afternoon.. 3657MB/s @ 10,5 x 233Mhz. Thats 98% if I'm right...
I only get 3120MB/s and I'm running @210MHz, 5-2-3-2.0, that's only a tad more than 92% efficiency. :/
Would 11-2-3-2.0 be more efficient ?
Now there's only one way to find out right? :D 11-2-2-2 would be better.. 11 gives me 35MB/s or so more then 5..so yes, it works.Quote:
Originally posted by Devil's Prophet
I only get 3120MB/s and I'm running @210MHz, 5-2-3-2.0, that's only a tad more than 92% efficiency. :/
Would 11-2-3-2.0 be more efficient ?
My experience is it only works on DC..not SC.. But I'm not 100% about that..
My twinmos 50D doesn't work @ ras to cas 2T, it's too tight for that bugger-kind of ram. :)
Well, my logic tells me that IF 11 would be faster, it would be also more unstable, right ? Like: 5 is stable, but 11 not yet. Is that correct or is 11 more stable because it's a "higher" mem-timing ?
Your max bus is 233x16=3728mbsQuote:
Originally posted by Fewture
The mem needs to be perfectly stable, you need high cpu Mhz and thight timings. Then you will get 98%. I got it this afternoon.. 3657MB/s @ 10,5 x 233Mhz. Thats 98% if I'm right...
Your score is 3657 divided by 3728 (max bus) =0.98095494
Let's just say it's 98% :D
My mem is perfectly stable, i did this mod:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...threadid=17481
Now i have the feeling that my bios sucks but got to find out what goes wrong, trying to flash it. (n00b)
Some say it is more stable and faster.. But I found that isn't true. It might be more relaxed for the chipset, but not for the memory.. I had to up the voltage a tad to run 11-2-2-2 vs 7-2-2-2. It is faster so yes, it harder on the mem I would think.. :)Quote:
Originally posted by Devil's Prophet
My twinmos 50D doesn't work @ ras to cas 2T, it's too tight for that bugger-kind of ram. :)
Well, my logic tells me that IF 11 would be faster, it would be also more unstable, right ? Like: 5 is stable, but 11 not yet. Is that correct or is 11 more stable because it's a "higher" mem-timing ?
I pulled the heatspreaders off my 3200LL Twinx yesterday.. Winbond CH-5 :rolleyes:
Ik have a possibility to buy Mushkin PC3500 Level2 Dual Pack. It uses BH-5 and my memory does 225 11-2-2-2 3.2V prime stable.. That is a bit dissapointing.. should I dump the Corsair and go for the Mushkin? I was thinking I'd go for it..see what happens.
well.. did the vdd mod (1.84) and the newest bios 3716 does his thing ;)
with GeIL 3500 dual chan .. but this mofo wont let me do 3dmark :/ well gotta try ;)
Hey.
Here's mine at 240 2,0-11-2-2 3,16V dual. Bios 18 and yesterday I 've done another bench I yielded even higher results like 3735/3533MB iirc :D
Update.
Timings 2,0-11-2-2. :D
try the 10 multiplier , this is the highest score you can have with abit ;)
Unfortunately I cannot boot at that one and 10.5 and 11. 11.5 is the one it starts working again :(Quote:
Originally posted by xigfrid
try the 10 multiplier , this is the highest score you can have with abit ;)
Hopefully with my incoming barton I can get back these mults...
@pc ice
Thx :D
Working hard on it. Hope I'll get a good barton matching or even beating those clocks and then I will mod my raddy. If it fails then I will rma it hoping to get a better core ;)
Damn, those are some good bandwidth numbers!
Here's my humble effort:
This is using an Asus A7N8X-X SC motherboard.CPU=Athlon XP 2400+, running at 200*11=2.2Ghz. RAM is a 256MB stick of CRAP Kingston ValueRAM DDR400, made by Mosel Vitalic :mad: . Timings = 2.5/4/4/6. Tried lowering to 2.0, board hung on me. CPU is at 1.675V, RAM @ 2.8V.
Will increasing the RAM voltage to 2.9V help bring the CAS latency down to 2.0?
Finally got some results to show even though they're not that good.
here, this is all i could get with this old 1700 dut3c without the vcore mod since the highest vcore on this board is 1.85v (1.92 for real) and it needs 2v for 2300mhz...
3400 is not bad for 225fsb with 2-3-3-9 :)
i dont think so ;)
gotta love those fortron psus :D
with the higher rails i can now do 9x240 2-2-3-9 PRIMESTABLE!
1.7v vdd default nb with delta@5v sb with zalman and 40mm fan@5v twinmos3700+khx 3500@3.2v
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postid=216348
not bad for the crappy 9 multi! i need a better cpu to get some 10x and 11x action :D
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postid=216352
I think it will do prime stable with a little less voltage as well.
The important part is that you voltages don't drop too much, otherwise prime will surely fail.
If i give more than 1.93Vcore my 12V will drop to 11.5V or even lower.
Needless to say Prime fails.
Running such high voltages will definatly short the liftime of your hardware but if you're happy with it, then so am i. ;)
Here's mine:
http://members.speedguide.net/lt73/too_point_five_.jpg
Still werkin on it. I keep hittin a wall @ 230 :mad:
does 11 give you higher scores than 9?
Yeah, by about 5 points.Quote:
Originally posted by saaya
does 11 give you higher scores than 9?
Did you try all 3 with the same CPU?Quote:
Originally posted by pc ice
i bought 3 new nf7's this week and they all have a problem going over 235....it's bothering me...i have gone threw about 7 or more nf7's seem's the earlyer one went higher...i mean i have all the ram i need to test with ram doe's over 250 easy even at 2.5.2.2 timing's but not these three board's there just not having it..what you guy's think.
It might be the CPU limiting the FSB.
Do the NB have the same stepping on all 3?
Could also be bios related....
Yeah. I know that issue... :rolleyes: :DQuote:
Originally posted by pc ice
but these last three seem to suck or have a block at 230/235.
Mine seems to have a block at 250 dc ;)
Some of the newer boards seem to have probs getting high fsbs and others do that stock :p:
Mickeymouse alias Jason has also noticed this some time ago :(
Here's my new mem bench :
http://members.speedguide.net/lt73/bench1.jpg
Barton XP2500 @ 11.5x227=2505Mhz 1.8vcore, 2.9vdimm
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...threadid=18998
H20 cooled ;)
same here with my 3 nf7-s 2.0 boards... i think nvidia is using silicon of a worse quality for the last nf2 chipsets to save mobney. same with amd.Quote:
i bought 3 new nf7's this week and they all have a problem going over 235....it's bothering me...i have gone threw about 7 or more nf7's seem's the earlyer one went higher...i mean i have all the ram i need to test with ram doe's over 250 easy even at 2.5.2.2 timing's but not these three board's there just not having it..what you guy's think.
Little improvement on the bandwidth side of things...
Just found out that 11-2-2-2.0 performs better than 11-3-2-2.0.
My Twinmos PC 3700 forced me to run 11-3-2-2.0 but my trusty old Twinmos/Winbond BH-5 does 11-2-2-2.0 no problem.
Spot the difference:
Hey Zeus, looks like I see about a 30ish point increase with tighter timings. Most impressive!
I finally got 230 from my twinmos PC3200 BH-5 , still at 2.8vdimm @ 11-2-2-2
http://members.speedguide.net/lt73/bench2.jpg
here mine's
all the test were with 10x because actually i got lower mem-result with 10,5x (if the damn would like to boot at 250 Mhz :()
243Mhz 2-3-2-11 : 3748
245Mhz 2-3-2-11 : 3770
245Mhz 2-2-2-11 : 3786
I wished i could have 245Mhz*10,5 stable , but no way even if the barton would run at 2.63Ghz stable :D
That's some awesome results man!! :toast:Quote:
Originally posted by xigfrid
here mine's
all the test were with 10x because actually i got lower mem-result with 10,5x (if the damn would like to boot at 250 Mhz :()
243Mhz 2-3-2-11 : 3748
245Mhz 2-3-2-11 : 3770
245Mhz 2-2-2-11 : 3786
I wished i could have 245Mhz*10,5 stable , but no way even if the barton would run at 2.63Ghz stable :D
No way that you even get 245MHz dual 2,0-11-2-2 stable cause it's the nb limiting you! :(
I ran memtest for windows over an hour at 250 MHz single channel at 3,20V and only had 1 error... at dual errors appear every second (almost ;) )!!!
I feel I could run up to 255MHz... :rolleyes:
memtest is not everything ...
I ran memtest86 240Mhz DC 2-2-2-11 all the night on test#5, had no error after about 4XX passes :D
but when i got CPU priming, fluctuations kill the stability, even if i try to overvolt the cpu :rolleyes:
btw, I think i 'll wait my new NF7, because i can't get it stable at 240Mhz, i m quiet happy with theses benchmarks thinking that the mobo wouldn't do 200Mhz DC at stock stable :p:
Quote:
Originally posted by xigfrid
memtest is not everything ...
I ran memtest86 240Mhz DC 2-2-2-11 all the night on test#5, had no error after about 4XX passes :D
but when i got CPU priming, fluctuations kill the stability, even if i try to overvolt the cpu :rolleyes:
Yeah. I know. Same results with memtest 3.0 in dos :rolleyes:
But memtest for windows plays in another liga ;)
There's more stress from other components in windows too...
Didn 't believe it myself. Vdd is also important.
I've figured it out the same problem, memtest at 220 11-2-2-2 produced O error in memtest for 4 pass, with OCZ 3500EL and 2.8vdimm, but once in windows, spalsh, exe error, crc error and finally blue screen. Though, I was able to test under sandra, and reached 3360mb/s. I don't know what's wrong, but it's only stable at 200mhz now, everything over that point seems to crash.I've tryed ONCE to boot at 8*230mhz, but black screen, mobo not responding. I guess I have a bad NF7.
Give the mem all volts you can ;)Quote:
Originally posted by kanedazan
I've figured it out the same problem, memtest at 220 11-2-2-2 produced O error in memtest for 4 pass, with OCZ 3500EL and 2.8vdimm, but once in windows, spalsh, exe error, crc error and finally blue screen. Though, I was able to test under sandra, and reached 3360mb/s. I don't know what's wrong, but it's only stable at 200mhz now, everything over that point seems to crash.I've tryed ONCE to boot at 8*230mhz, but black screen, mobo not responding. I guess I have a bad NF7.
But I experienced some bad nf7 too... :(
11 indeed gives better scores than 9
9x240 2-2-3-9 =3501
9x240 2-2-3-11=3518
damn i need a better cpu to get some 10x action going :(
Is 3340/3124 good for 220 SC?
2-2-2-11 Epox 8RDA+ 3309 bios.. need other stick of ram 8-)
I got a pair of TwinMOS Twister PC3700 256MB.
In sandra at 223MHz 2.0-2-3-6 @ 2.6V; DC; CPU interface enabled. Results are:
3425/3222
I'am having some NB problems, I'll try some Vdd mod, because if I drop Vdd from 1.7 to 1.6 I can only do 219MHz. But if I loosen my timings or up my mem voltage there is no way to get over 223MHz. It is Prime95 stable at this speed and voltage. At 225 MHz Prime95 crashes after 2 seconds no matter what Vmem I set. Obiously an NB problem.
my score
is this any good?:confused:
koensa, thats bad... 11.5 multi sux... try 11
9x245dc 2-2-3-11
i hate this 9x multi... need to finish my waterchiller :mad:
nope its the only way to max out my cpu!Quote:
Originally posted by saaya
koensa, thats bad... 11.5 multi sux... try 11
my ram is kingston BH6chips....
223 2 2 11 on 2.9volt is max stable :s
any other advice?
thanks!
My Kingston HyperX PC3500 is using CH-5 chips.... whats the best I can get out of them, and at what voltage?
Im at 11,3,2,2.0 cpu enabled 223Mhz @ 3.01v vddr.
Also, with volt modding the vDDR... anyone found the place for vmodding the vddq and vref voltages for the dimms?
I have read people mentioning thier rams getting hot... if you up the vDDR and leave the vREF and vDDQ stock....this will lead to self-heating within the ram chips due to the extra voltage difference internally.
Just as example... proper setting would be vDDR 3.2v, vDDQ 3.0v and vREF 1.5v, based on the supply specs for most of the ddr manufacturers. Goose-ing the 3.3V rail actually impacts all 3, while the vmod only impacts vDDR.
Just curious.
who told you that? the dimms generate their own vref afaik from the vdimm they get.
koensa, the 11 multiplier will give you higher bandwidth scores, believe me.
you mean the 11 of the rap settings?
we'l i already am using that (as u can see on pic)
will more bandwith also mean beter superpi?:d
so u adice 11*223 (2-2-2-11) in stead of 11.5*223(2-2-2-11)
Im looking at the DDR dimm module spec right now as I type.
Pin 1, front.. VREF, pin 7 front VDD, pin 15 front VDDQ....etc.
So where is this onboard vREF/vDDQ powersupply on the DDR sticks?
Who told me... Mr Fking Samsung told me.
koensa, no i mean the 11 multiplier.
uwackme, wth is your problem???
easy now guys... lets not get all up in a fight over some few issues...
have a beer..
:toast:
Hy i'm also buying new DDR memory sticks. Now i have ddr 333 Mhz:mad: . I'm now looking for 2×256MB PC3500 or 3700 ram's. Which is better Twinmos Twister or Kingston HyperX. Twinmos is cheaper it's cost $105 (256MB PC 3500 two stricks $210 §§§§ing prices) Cordsair memory is to expencive here in EU. Maybe is better 2×512???
Yeah. It will.Quote:
Originally posted by koensa
will more bandwith also mean beter superpi?:d
I did superpi at 9,5x248MHz (=2360MHz) dc 2,0-2-2-11 and got 40s at 1M calc... My friend got 40s too at 11x232 I think, but maybe it's also because of he's using tbred and me barton ;)
Which memory is Better => Twinmos Twister PC3500, Corsair XMS 3500 or OCZ EL 3500?
I have Twister 3700 at the moment and they are running at 232MHz with 2.0-2-4-7 timing and 2.8Vmem. But I heard that Twister 3500 doesen't overclock as good as 3700. So I sugest you to go for Corsair.Quote:
Originally posted by DjTonic
Which memory is Better => Twinmos Twister PC3500, Corsair XMS 3500 or OCZ EL 3500?
Hy TribesMan:D Corsairs PC 3700 have the same IC's as Transcend PC 3200 (Big price difference:D ). Ram chips are Samsung TCCC and they's can overclock up to 250 MHZ or more. Read this review @ TweakTown
hehe my 1st post here
http://members.optusnet.com.au/andriel/OMFG.JPG
Dual channel with 2 x 256 Twinmos 3700 with d10 bios
:D
Wow :o. Great score and overclocks. Twinmos rox! My next memory is twinmos ;). What kind of mem do you have? Twister or basic twinmos?
thanks :)Quote:
Originally posted by DjTonic
Wow :o. Great score and overclocks. Twinmos rox! My next memory is twinmos ;). What kind of mem do you have? Twister or basic twinmos?
the twinmos 3700 is the normal ones with the TMD chips
Tho I have a twister 3200 which goes only till 225 with 2.5-3-3 timings anything higher would have to be 2.5-3-4
mars, what mods did you do to get your board up till 250?
Btw, nice clockspeed! :toast:
i got the vdd mod doneQuote:
Originally posted by Zeus
mars, what mods did you do to get your board up till 250?
Btw, nice clockspeed! :toast:
vdd @ 1.9v
with a lapped amd hsf on the nb
:)
You got lucky with your mobo i guess. :thumbsup:Quote:
Originally posted by mars
i got the vdd mod done
vdd @ 1.9v
with a lapped amd hsf on the nb
:)
Can't you tighten up your timings a tad more, i had my TwinMos PC3700 running 11-3-2 Cas2.0 @ 242MHz and only 3.0V
This will yield a bit better bandwidthtest result.
How much do you feed your PC 3700?
uhh one more thing, theres a 7000 rpm fan on that hsf on my NB :D which is on full for benchmarkingQuote:
Originally posted by Zeus
You got lucky with your mobo i guess. :thumbsup:
Can't you tighten up your timings a tad more, i had my TwinMos PC3700 running 11-3-2 Cas2.0 @ 242MHz and only 3.0V
This will yield a bit better bandwidthtest result.
How much do you feed your PC 3700?
i fed my 3700 2.9v@2.94v in winbond (i seriously doubt its accuracy, it should be higher)
but no i wasnt able to get to windows using 11-3-2-2@250
Il probably attempt it again once i get the vdimm modd done :)
How come there isn't a Springdale/Canterwood official bandwidth thread? A64?
Yeah, i think if you raise Vdimm up to 3.1V you should be able to tighten your timings a bit.Quote:
Originally posted by mars
uhh one more thing, theres a 7000 rpm fan on that hsf on my NB :D which is on full for benchmarking
i fed my 3700 2.9v@2.94v in winbond (i seriously doubt its accuracy, it should be higher)
but no i wasnt able to get to windows using 11-3-2-2@250
Il probably attempt it again once i get the vdimm modd done :)
Unfortunately RAS to CAS delay has got to be set to 3 with this TwinMos pc 3700, when set to 2 it's a no-go.
It would be real nice to see 250 DC with tight timings and CPU interface enabled.
You'll be lookin at some 3800+ bandwidth! :slobber:
Good luck with the Vdimm mod. ;)
Quote:
Originally posted by Soulburner
How come there isn't a Springdale/Canterwood official bandwidth thread? A64?
That is probably cause none ever started one.
This thread is started almost a year ago and is still fun to read from page one.
Mainly because what we are doing now with these NF7 boards was done almost a year ago by ppl like Opp and the likes.
Maybe you should start a Springdale/Canterwood bandwidth thread. ;)
Because I haven't posted in ages :P ROFL!Quote:
Originally posted by Soulburner
How come there isn't a Springdale/Canterwood official bandwidth thread? A64?
Let's start one up! :D
Yeah, shame on you man! ;) :DQuote:
Originally posted by sysfailur
Because I haven't posted in ages :P ROFL!
NF7-S + KHX3500 CH-5
Vdd 1.8V
Vddr: 3.18V
- No heatspreaders on the mem
- Watercooled NB + CPU
http://www.fewture.cistron.nl/246MHz11222.JPG
I need a faster CPU.... :(
Same bench as above only 10,5 multi..
http://www.fewture.cistron.nl/nf7-s2/3845.JPG
I love my board :rolleyes:
woah thats some good bandwidth.... :DQuote:
Originally posted by Fewture
Same bench as above only 10,5 multi..
http://www.fewture.cistron.nl/nf7-s2/3845.JPG
I love my board :rolleyes:
Tnx guys.. I'm afraid I can't go any faster than this. To have good benchies I need the 10,5 multi and right now the cpu is right on the max.
I've run 10 x 250, but it's pretty bad (the memscore) and I get a 16 color desktop. What does that mean? :rolleyes:
What I find so amazing is that this mem is CH-5.. doing 246 11-2-2-2 and 244 11-2-2-2 pifast stable :eek: Last week is bsod'ed on me @ 200 11-2-2-2 LOL!
Pifast gave 53.80 btw..it's in the pifast thread.
Tried that today..no luck.. Can't really get 246 stable either. Right now I'm 3D stable @ 237MHz 11-2-2-2 which is pretty good I think.Quote:
Originally posted by pc ice
try uping the agp / pci...alittle if you havent aready.....
250 now bsod's on me randomly..maybe the KHX doesn't like it. Will try again with some more mem voltage. Max I used now was 3.25V w/ 3.3V @ 3.45. 8-4-4-3 also doesn't help.. so I don't really know right now to be honest. :P
Tnx for the advice.
rofl some of the pics have been currupted a la opps post page 3
This is mine
Soltek SL-75FRN2-L
256 x 2 ADATA VITESTA PC 4000
ANTEC True Power Mod
VDD 1.8 Volt
http://www.geocities.com/universtech/250.txt
this is with my nf7-s no mods vdd @1,7 vdimm 2,9 2x256mb 3500xms 5-2-2-2 1700+@2,4ghz
http://www.kaioken.ch/pictures/3412.PNG
Those are very bad timings my man. If you tighten them some your score will go up. 250MHz is nice offcourse, but not with those timings. Try 11-3-3-2.5 for instance and see what happens. After that..tighten some more etc etc..Quote:
Originally posted by Benny Lodewijk
This is mine
Soltek SL-75FRN2-L
256 x 2 ADATA VITESTA PC 4000
ANTEC True Power Mod
VDD 1.8 Volt
http://www.geocities.com/universtech/250.txt
You can get the same score with much lower fsb. Good luck :toast:
you should mention that its a whicked fSB comming from a Soltek board!
it's because of the multiplier !! try change it to 10,5x as minimum. it helps a lot..Quote:
Originally posted by Fewture
Those are very bad timings my man. If you tighten them some your score will go up. 250MHz is nice offcourse, but not with those timings. Try 11-3-3-2.5 for instance and see what happens. After that..tighten some more etc etc..
You can get the same score with much lower fsb. Good luck :toast:
Yep, I went from 3780MB/s on MP10 to 3845MB/s on MP10,5. Same fsb, same timings. That was on 246MHz btw.Quote:
Originally posted by EdgarBaba
it's because of the multiplier !! try change it to 10,5x as minimum. it helps a lot..
My ADATA Vitesta can't run stable @ 250 Mhz TRCD 3,i have some update with sisandra memory bandwidth 3780. Soon i will upload the screenshot :)
And there is more.. :D :D
http://www.fewture.cistron.nl/nf7-s2/249sandra.JPG
Kingston HyperX PC3500 CH-5 (no heatspreaders)
11-2-2-2
3.25V Vdimm
no Vdd mod (it doesn't seem to work??? So took it off and runs fine now :confused: )
CPU int enable
DC offcourse :D
Barton 2500+ week 24 TPLV 2.27V on plain water.
Bandwith efficiency dropped to 97%, will try and fix that (was 98% before). I think the mem is getting too unstable.
Pifast stable on 245MHz:
http://www.fewture.cistron.nl/pifast/245pifast.JPG
MP11 is still a tad faster:
http://www.fewture.cistron.nl/pifast/53.42pifast.JPG
Very true indeed! :eek:Quote:
Originally posted by bias_hjorth
you should mention that its a whicked fSB comming from a Soltek board!
That's some nice bandwidth mate! :eek:
I might try to take my Vdd mod off as well, as i never use anything over 1.7Vdd, see what it'll do...
Are you still using bios d10?
;)
Yes, still on bios 10.. Will give 14, 18 and 19 another shot since NoStra reported 0.2 sec off his pifast time with bios 19.Quote:
Originally posted by Zeus
That's some nice bandwidth mate! :eek:
I might try to take my Vdd mod off as well, as i never use anything over 1.7Vdd, see what it'll do...
Are you still using bios d10?
;)
Hmmm, that's something to consider then, does d19 allow mults 10 and 10,5?
i have 1 ?uestion ;) how do you flash to d10?? when i try awdflash says: bios write protected... i see no option in bios to change.. or is it a jumper?
Use the abit flashmenu tool. Can flash through windows :)Quote:
Originally posted by swissocer
i have 1 ?uestion ;) how do you flash to d10?? when i try awdflash says: bios write protected... i see no option in bios to change.. or is it a jumper?
And it's also able to flash every bios into the rom... ;) So be careful you have the right one.
ok ive downloaded the modded one d10.. is this good?
Yes. I already flashed that one about 8 times or more (to test that piece-of-cr@p-bios ;) )...Quote:
Originally posted by swissocer
ok ive downloaded the modded one d10.. is this good?
lol piece of crap`? man dont confuse me :/ hrhr ;)
Hi,
What modded D10 bios are you talking about ?
Where can i download it, and does it solve the SATA corruption problem ?????
How the hell you get 10.5 multi to work at that FSB :eek:
Gimme gimme gimme :)
262x8 1:1 2-2-2-11, CPU Interface Enabled (NF7-S rev 2) :toast: :banana:
(couldn't attach, too big - 2048x1536)
http://vipers.xtremedesign.ca/files/262.jpg