Pifast Benchmark

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

03-07-2003, 08:55 AM
sysfailur

ctgilles, get that cpu-z screen out of the way I can't see the chick!
03-07-2003, 05:12 PM
sysfailur

Heh, well.... no computational errors this time.

And hear me now. I aint done baby! Triple T's gonna bring the pain! :P

http://www.maximumoc.com/img/hardwar...56s_pifast.jpg
03-08-2003, 01:12 AM
Walrusbonzo

Can anyone beat my 50.78?

Why is my score so good when my CPU is at only 2.3GHz, I don't get this benchmark!
03-08-2003, 02:24 AM
Fusion

Quote:

Originally posted by Walrusbonzo
Can anyone beat my 50.78?

Why is my score so good when my CPU is at only 2.3GHz, I don't get this benchmark!

you've gotta be doing something wrong somewhere, that would be a world record :rolleyes: you must be using different settings? Look at sysfailurs score, and he's got a few more mhz than you :cool:
03-08-2003, 02:39 AM
Walrusbonzo

Well, I'm just using the hexus pifast script! :stick:
03-08-2003, 03:55 AM
Fusion

full loaded got a similar result to you at a similar clock speed, so both you and him must be running a different version :S
03-08-2003, 04:03 AM
JCviggen

Quote:

Originally posted by Fusion
full loaded got a similar result to you at a similar clock speed, so both you and him must be running a different version :S

I zipped my DIR, if the results remain too fast it must be the computar ;)

http://users.pandora.be/JCviggen/hexus_pifast.zip
03-08-2003, 05:23 AM
Walrusbonzo

Yep, must be 'cause I've been using PiFast 4.2 and not 4.1 :(

Wish it was my PC :D
03-08-2003, 07:22 AM
Caprid

:)

Quote:

Originally posted by sysfailur
Ahh oh well. Well, me barton will be here tomorrow.

Speaking of bartons.... new record set by umekami10

:)

http://caprid.homestead.com/files/piB50.91.jpg

:)
03-08-2003, 07:26 AM
M@tt

Well the PIfast Challenge returns :)

David @ Hexus.net has offered to Host for Free, PMM has done all the work and thanks to Jeff F for his help.

To submit your Pifast Bench or to Download the Pifast program
click here.... Pifast Challenge

PMM will attempt to update as much as possible in the early stages, just to get the table going, after that expect Daily Updates after 7PM UK Time.

I hope you enjoy the tables :)
03-08-2003, 07:49 AM
sysfailur

Quote:

Originally posted by M@tt
Well the PIfast Challenge returns :)

David @ Hexus.net has offered to Host for Free, PMM has done all the work and thanks to Jeff F for his help.

To submit your Pifast Bench or to Download the Pifast program
click here.... Pifast Challenge

PMM will attempt to update as much as possible in the early stages, just to get the table going, after that expect Daily Updates after 7PM UK Time.

I hope you enjoy the tables :)

Thank gawd! It was getting to the point where I was going to just offer to put it on my site... I could've done that no problem since the prob started. If it goes down again I'm slapping it on my site :P
03-08-2003, 08:15 AM
PMM

did not take sys long ;)

Don't forget folks submit your screen captures in this thread as well.
03-08-2003, 08:57 AM
zakelwe

Quote:

Originally posted by PMM
did not take sys long ;)

Don't forget folks submit your screen captures in this thread as well.

Thanks PMM for doing this :) and to Dave at Hexus as well

I'll see if I can get a good score tonight.

Regards

Andy
03-08-2003, 09:06 AM
zakelwe

Quote:

Originally posted by PMM
did not take sys long ;)

Don't forget folks submit your screen captures in this thread as well.

Do you submit screen captures in the comments section, by using an URL, and then you take them out ? :confused:

Regards

Andy
03-08-2003, 09:07 AM
RootX

Breaking the 57secs....
03-08-2003, 09:08 AM
M@tt

Quote:

Originally posted by zakelwe
Do you submit screen captures in the comments section, by using an URL, and then you take them out ? :confused:

Regards

Andy

Hello zakelwe

Just post the the screen shot in this thread :) please
03-08-2003, 09:13 AM
muzz

Excellent!!!! wtg M@tt

Time to have some fum huh fellas........:D
03-08-2003, 09:21 AM
Caprid

Is the Pifast bench you have for downloading the same as the old one? I'm figuring it is, just double checking.
03-08-2003, 09:23 AM
PMM

yes same one.
03-08-2003, 09:41 AM
Caprid

Thanks. You'll have my submission shortly then :)

Thanks, to everyone involved in resurrecting the page from the grave :toast:
03-08-2003, 10:22 AM
PMM

Ok just done a ickle update :)
03-08-2003, 10:49 AM
sysfailur

Quote:

Originally posted by PMM
did not take sys long ;)

Don't forget folks submit your screen captures in this thread as well.

Hahah you know it! I am addicted to hexus pifast!

My screenshot is a bit up on this page somewhere's ;)
03-08-2003, 11:34 AM
zakelwe

The problem with advertising it on xtremesystems.org of course is that even though I can get sub 1 minute my score is going to be dead last as it is about 58 seconds.

:rolleyes:

LOL

:D

Regards

Andy
03-08-2003, 11:36 AM
zakelwe

PS Where are the Hexus guys on there ??

;)
03-08-2003, 11:52 AM
muzz

Quote:

Originally posted by zakelwe
The problem with advertising it on xtremesystems.org of course is that even though I can get sub 1 minute my score is going to be dead last as it is about 58 seconds.

:rolleyes:

LOL

:D

Regards

Andy

Looks like you'll have to push your gear a little harder with this group.......
If it makes ya feel any better my best is a little under 58 seconds.
I will be trying again though, as I didn't have alot of experience with this board when I was doing the benches... should be a little better now..... but not enough to really compete;)
03-08-2003, 11:58 AM
Nohto

muzz, did you get better performance running single or dual channel on your 8RDA+? What dimm did you use, best mem timings? Thanks,
Nate
03-08-2003, 12:08 PM
muzz

Definitely better scores running dual on my board.
I use slots 1+2 ( furthest and closest in relation to the cpu), with ram timings ( when I was testing pifast) of 5-2-2-2 I believe ( It can do lower, but it's fine for just putzin' around)..
I will get a better score than the 1 I posted here and at Kains site( which never made it there, as it went offline) now, but I am not foolish enough to think that with my cpu and cooling I can honestly compete with these guys.. but it is fun.:toast:
03-08-2003, 12:15 PM
PMM

Quote:

Originally posted by zakelwe
The problem with advertising it on xtremesystems.org of course is that even though I can get sub 1 minute my score is going to be dead last as it is about 58 seconds.

Nowt wrong with 58sec get it submitted :D

I'm holding off submitting a better score since I'm updating the tables that said its not gonna get near the top 3 :)
03-08-2003, 01:40 PM
zakelwe

As Muzz says it is fun and it is also a good quick test for stability.

However, some people before have been getting very low scores with "average" systems .. when I say average no offence as that is similar to my spec, but average compared to the guys at the very top ( you all know who :) )

Here's a guy who ran it when I told him about it, he has a good XP2100 running 2300-2400MHz on nforce2 at about 210 FSB, so I'd assume a 60-64 second run or there abouts:-

Program : PiFast version 4.2, by Xavier Gourdon
Computation of 10000000 digits of Pi
Method used : Chudnovsky
Size of FFT : 1024 K
Physical memory used : ~ 61355 K
Disk memory used : ~ 0.00 Meg
------------------------------------------------------------
Computation run information :

Start : Sun Mar 09 01:35:16 2003
End : Sun Mar 09 01:36:07 2003
Duration : 50.98 seconds
==================================================
==========
Total computation time : 50.98 seconds (~ 0.01 hours)
==================================================
==========

Are we all running the same version here ??

:confused: :confused:

Regards

Andy
03-08-2003, 02:01 PM
JCviggen

thats v4.2 , you need 4.1 .... as you can guess, 4.1 is slower
03-08-2003, 02:04 PM
PMM

If its what I saw the other day did he not say he had version 4.2
of pifast and just used the hexus batch file with it?

To maintain the standard I have kept with the orginal 4.1 version I have charted all the trusted results to compare against I have
more results than shown Table results ;)
03-08-2003, 02:45 PM
zakelwe

Yes, I ran both and got :-

v 4.1

http://www.aocb77.dsl.pipex.com/pifast41.jpg

and with v 4.2

http://www.aocb77.dsl.pipex.com/pifast42.jpg

How are you going to split up the 41's from the 42's, say if someone gets a 61 second time apart from using intuition ? There is already confusion from new people trying it and thinking they have got a great score.

I think it is better if we all use 4.1 but for the moment I will put in my 4.2.

Regards

Andy
03-08-2003, 03:10 PM
sysfailur

Quote:

Originally posted by PMM
If its what I saw the other day did he not say he had version 4.2
of pifast and just used the hexus batch file with it?

To maintain the standard I have kept with the orginal 4.1 version I have charted all the trusted results to compare against I have
more results than shown Table results ;)

Good idea to stick with what was started with.
03-08-2003, 03:27 PM
sysfailur

Btw PMM.. you should really have a section for motherboard!

People are putting it in their comments, but you should have a column for it. Make it prettier ;)
03-08-2003, 04:10 PM
PMM

thats just me I was men't to combine it into comments I forgot
with the earlier ones but the latter ones I Included into comments.

Erm....... The whole point of using the Hexus Pifast is to download
the one supplied in the link not use the 4.2 from else where :rolleyes:

But hay I could very easily change it to 4.2 and scrap the old
that way you all have to use the latest and then theres no
messing or cheating.

I can declare all given results so far as version 4.1 and switch.
03-08-2003, 11:37 PM
M@tt

Quote:

Originally posted by PMM
thats just me I was men't to combine it into comments I forgot
with the earlier ones but the latter ones I Included into comments.

Erm....... The whole point of using the Hexus Pifast is to download
the one supplied in the link not use the 4.2 from else where :rolleyes:

But hay I could very easily change it to 4.2 and scrap the old
that way you all have to use the latest and then theres no
messing or cheating.

I can declare all given results so far as version 4.1 and switch.

I think we should leave it as it is, it allows people to compare to reviews of the latest hardware and IMO if people are sad enough to cheat, they will anyway.

I hope we would spot a rogue result that was submitted and ask for additional proof :)
03-09-2003, 08:38 AM
ctgilles

Quote:

Originally posted by sysfailur
ctgilles, get that cpu-z screen out of the way I can't see the chick!

Hehe, stratigically placed :)
www.ctgilles.net/bmf/files/wallpapers.rar 9.50Mb file and lotsa papers @ 1280*1024 and beyond :)
03-09-2003, 09:14 AM
Fusion

ctgilles, cracking wallpaper bundle you have there :D :toast:

Back on topic, I've sumitted my result to the site, bringing up the rear in 19th place lol ;)
03-09-2003, 01:28 PM
mkleingeld

Hey Andy, just saw your new 3dmark01se score. Congratulations with that! And thanx for your remark about me in there :)
03-09-2003, 03:48 PM
muzz

Well I shaved a bit off my best score. still lame in comparison to other folks, but hey. still working on it.
8RDA+/2600+/ 2x256 XMS3500c2 2.9 vdimm/VDD1.8
11x229fsb 5-2-2-2 timings 2520mhzhttp://home.attbi.com/~gpl08/57.09_p...-2_2520mhz.jpg
03-09-2003, 04:09 PM
sysfailur

muzz, don't put yourself down. Anything under 60 seconds is nice!

ctgilles: Nice collection!
03-09-2003, 04:17 PM
muzz

I'm cool with the score, my best was high 57's B4 tonight. so thats cool that I almost got to the high 56's........ I need better cooling.....gotta get the cpu down<15 degrees C... that was at about 28 deg. according to usdm, the sensors are low so that was prolly really about 38 degrees or so, which is killing my top end.
I'm happy with it..... FOR NOW!!!....
Thx Sys........ now go break that 56 barrier.....:toast:
03-10-2003, 01:05 AM
sysfailur

Soon as I get distribution blocks and tubing, no prob!
03-10-2003, 06:04 AM
muzz

I just went to the page..... I have the wrong score........ I don't know if I typed it wrong, or they did......... MATT can you fix my score so that it reads 57.09 instead of 57.03 ?
I just want it to be accurate..
If I mistyped it I apologize..... not trying to screw anyone.
03-10-2003, 06:57 AM
M@tt

Sorry muzz, it was my mistake

It's fixed now :)
03-10-2003, 07:01 AM
muzz

NP M@tt, thanks.......I really didn't care who's mistake, either way it was inadvertant.... like I said I just wanted it to reflect the truth is all.
I'm like that:D

Thanks Again M@tt
03-10-2003, 09:07 AM
macci

My latest result:
http://www.solidhardware.com/macci/x...ex_pi_2950.gif
XP2100 week 4, temps -7C, 2.2V. Did about 2400MHz 1.92V +10C air and retail cooler.
8RDA+ w/ aircooled NB, 2x256MB HyperX 3500 3-2-2-2 settings.
03-10-2003, 10:00 AM
Fusion

Macci you own lol :) Just noticed your 7k score in 3d mark03 aswell, congrats :toast:
03-10-2003, 10:08 AM
taco

omfg macci... air cooled??!? i thought my 2.7 air cooled was sweet.. i gotta get one of those 2100+ and another stick of ram.

http://www.angelfire.com/droid/newb2k/2.7ghz_taco.jpg
03-10-2003, 10:31 AM
macci

hehhe no tace hell no its not aircooled :D
CPU core temp -7C under full load (=poorly installed dryice container :D). Didn't have much time to play w/ that yet but I'd say that it can do about the same speed w/ my R404 vapocooler.
03-10-2003, 10:42 AM
taco

oh.. still thats sweet. if i had access to dry ice.. oh man that would be awsome, you peoples over in europe get to mess with all the cool chemicals and such. ;)
03-10-2003, 04:45 PM
Jeff

http://www.adventurevision.com/somepictures/5598.gif

My new low... and with a SLK-800A no less. :eek: ;)
03-10-2003, 05:16 PM
sysfailur

Quote:

Originally posted by macci
hehhe no tace hell no its not aircooled :D
CPU core temp -7C under full load (=poorly installed dryice container :D). Didn't have much time to play w/ that yet but I'd say that it can do about the same speed w/ my R404 vapocooler.

macci: What liquid do you use in the dry ice container? Thx
03-10-2003, 06:35 PM
muzz

Excellent work Jeff:thumbsup:

Sure seems like a sweet 2100+ bro:toast:
03-10-2003, 06:52 PM
mike.elmes

1 Attachment(s)

Just tinkering with my best overall score on this. At the current setup I'm getting this:
03-16-2003, 11:37 AM
macci

sys: the stuff is called masinol - gasoline antifreeze. Guess its basically ethanol.
03-16-2003, 01:25 PM
CodeRed

Well here's my attempt.

http://users.tpg.com.au/spark69/scre...pifast2847.jpg

I really need a better 8RDA+, this one just cant do dual channel well (every at 2V). Made up for the lack of FSB speed with the mem timings though :)

tried single channel (13x217) but got worse performance :(
03-22-2003, 01:09 PM
cpulloverclock

11.5*230.5 Dual DDR = 2651MHz in wc with a 2500+
http://enormimo.site.voila.fr/photos/53.80.JPG
03-23-2003, 07:57 PM
CodeRed

Here's a slightly better attempt.

http://users.tpg.com.au/spark69/scre...pifast2823.jpg

Took all the voltage I dare give it, Vcore=2.125, Vdd=2.0, Vdimm=3.1

Did a 52.88 sec run at 13x219 (2-2-2-3 DC) but cant repeat it :( Shouldve taken the screen shot straight away.
03-24-2003, 01:20 AM
cpulloverclock

2500+ always watercooled
233.86 10-2-2 cas2 at 2.9v
http://pifaste.site.voila.fr/52.89.JPG
03-26-2003, 12:30 AM
sysfailur

macci: Thanks! -- And nice scores guys!
04-22-2003, 04:12 AM
M@tt

http://www.kelham.freeserve.co.uk/52-67.jpg

XP 1700 12.5 x 228

Now to mode some bridges :D
04-22-2003, 04:09 PM
CodeRed

Phew, the competetion is getting tough around here. Better lift my game before I get run over :)

M@tt, can you delete my 8RDA+ result (53.34 sec) from the tables. I dont really need two entries and the NF7-S one is faster.
04-23-2003, 08:42 AM
hipro5

I CAN'T find my 52.45 score........Anyways.......Here you are again........Please IF you can, replace it with my older one.......... :D

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/png/Pi-fast_52.png
04-23-2003, 11:15 PM
sysfailur

SOMEONE STICKY THIS THREAD ALREADY! :P
04-24-2003, 01:41 AM
CodeRed

Sorry hipro, I cant let you beat me :D

http://www.users.tpg.com.au/spark69/nf7/pifast52.23.jpg
04-24-2003, 04:31 AM
hipro5

Enjoy your entries for now , coz in a couple of weeks you'll be HISTORY....... :D :toast:
04-24-2003, 04:44 AM
sysfailur

Quote:

Originally posted by hipro5
Enjoy your entries for now , coz in a couple of weeks you'll be HISTORY....... :D :toast:

A couple of weeks huh? I wouldn't get too antsy... a couple of weeks I'll have a LN2 container and of course, the LN2 to go with it! :P
04-24-2003, 04:54 AM
hipro5

Quote:

Originally posted by sysfailur
A couple of weeks huh? I wouldn't get too antsy... a couple of weeks I'll have a LN2 container and of course, the LN2 to go with it! :P

:D :D :D
04-24-2003, 11:06 AM
JCviggen

1 Attachment(s)

how do you guys like this :)
04-24-2003, 11:33 AM
ctgilles

nice JC :D
sometimes I want my Prometeia back... nooooot :)
shuttle is nice and silent ;)
04-24-2003, 12:13 PM
hipro5

You made it this time JC.... :D :toast:
04-24-2003, 12:19 PM
CodeRed

JC,
You make it look too easy :D

Congrats on the No 1 score ... again :toast:
04-24-2003, 12:20 PM
JCviggen

Quote:

Originally posted by hipro5
You made it this time JC.... :D :toast:

Well if you beat me with a canterwood, thats hardly something to worry about ... the price difference is too huge to be a realistic threat :)
Still, I have some more in this rig. I made it at 3012 and 232 also but the bugger froze in MS paint lmao :D
04-24-2003, 01:03 PM
hipro5

Quote:

Originally posted by JCviggen
Well if you beat me with a canterwood, thats hardly something to worry about ... the price difference is too huge to be a realistic threat :)
Still, I have some more in this rig. I made it at 3012 and 232 also but the bugger froze in MS paint lmao :D

I just LOVE your style JC...... :D :toast:
04-24-2003, 01:34 PM
Kunaak

1 Attachment(s)

I'll throw my hat into the ring.

2 tries and I got this.

54 something.
I'll work on it later.

nice test ;)
04-25-2003, 12:16 AM
M@tt

:toast: Well done JCviggen

The chart is up to date now, I have removed some of the entries by the same people, I hope you all approve :)
04-27-2003, 03:46 AM
M@tt

:D

http://www.kelham.freeserve.co.uk/5180.jpg
04-27-2003, 10:33 AM
Peckers

Whopee! made 75s :p

http://130.236.239.34/stuff/16.6-146_small_mod.jpg
04-29-2003, 07:47 AM
LORD

1 Attachment(s)

Thought I might put one in as well. I'll update with something more respectable later.

This was done while testing so didn't go for max clocks......:)
04-29-2003, 02:59 PM
CodeRed

Nice time LORD, what speed was that at?

Still on plain water or are u using the pelts now
04-29-2003, 06:10 PM
Kunaak

1 Attachment(s)

new High.

still testing...
04-29-2003, 09:38 PM
LORD

Quote:

Originally posted by CodeRed
Nice time LORD, what speed was that at?

Still on plain water or are u using the pelts now

It was at about the 2700 mark at the time. No pelts. No Ghetto cooling. Just testing fsb speeds.

How's the fsb situation?

http://www.bigbutton.com.au/~lord/wcpuid2690.jpg

[LORD EDIT: I did make a wcpuid shot but left it in th W2K partition]
04-30-2003, 01:37 AM
CodeRed

LORD,
Thats even better considering its just water cooled. 2nd highest water cooled result behind cpulloverclock's Barton.

Be nice to take that chip for a run in the prom :D

BTW FSB is still limited to 219 @ high Vcore ... R404a comes on Saturday, maybe it wont matter :D
04-30-2003, 04:12 AM
LORD

Quote:

Originally posted by CodeRed
LORD,
Thats even better considering its just water cooled. 2nd highest water cooled result behind cpulloverclock's Barton.

Be nice to take that chip for a run in the prom :D

BTW FSB is still limited to 219 @ high Vcore ... R404a comes on Saturday, maybe it wont matter :D

In the Prom it could be a 3 gig + chip.......!? We'll see.;)

Get better NB cooling and stick some more volt's in there. That'll get the fsb up higher! :D
04-30-2003, 06:56 AM
JCviggen

I did some more tweaking today, and I took down the 50s mark :)

http://users.pandora.be/JCviggen/PI.JPG
04-30-2003, 10:22 AM
PMM

:eek: nice :toast:
04-30-2003, 12:44 PM
Naasar

Quote:

Originally posted by Ilúvatar
Whopee! made 75s :p

http://130.236.239.34/stuff/16.6-146_small_mod.jpg

dude, where did u get ur 1700 from? also, how much voltage are u runnin' through that puppy to get it at 2400mhz?:eek:
04-30-2003, 03:07 PM
Hognert

http://home.no/deadeye/hexus_250.jpg

All I need now is a good cpu ;). Done with a crappy 1,6V 1700+ 0311 XPMW, Abit nf7-2 and one stick of bh-5 and one bh-6.
04-30-2003, 03:24 PM
muzz

Excellent work guys!!!

JC...... that thing is a monster bro!!
Good Job:toast:
04-30-2003, 03:36 PM
Caprid

Quote:

Originally posted by JCviggen
I did some more tweaking today, and I took down the 50s mark :)

Was wondering when you were going to break 50, nice work! :cool:
04-30-2003, 06:21 PM
Kunaak

Hognert

Oh my god....

jesus, congrats on the FSB.
holy jesus...
04-30-2003, 09:12 PM
GenTarkin

here are my results my P4@3.5ghz
Program : PiFast version 4.1, by Xavier Gourdon
Computation of 10000000 digits of Pi
Method used : Chudnovsky
Size of FFT : 1024 K
Physical memory used : ~ 61163 K
Disk memory used : ~ 0.00 Meg
------------------------------------------------------------
Computation run information :

Start : Wed Apr 30 23:11:43 2003
End : Wed Apr 30 23:12:47 2003
Duration : 63.75 seconds
================================================== ==========
Total computation time : 63.75 seconds (~ 0.02 hours)
04-30-2003, 09:29 PM
LORD

All nice times there people.

JC, have to mention that is really an outstanding effort. :toast:

Hognert, if you did those times at that fsb, it's sick man.:D
05-01-2003, 12:34 AM
Hognert

Quote:

Originally posted by LORD

Hognert, if you did those times at that fsb, it's sick man.:D

Yeah its done at 11*250 :). Just ran it a few times and posted the best one.. sure it can do sub 52 if I work on it some.

Heres pcmark at 250 btw :).
05-01-2003, 01:32 AM
ctgilles

excellent :D sweet times :toast:
05-01-2003, 01:40 AM
CodeRed

JC,
just following your example :D

Squeezed out a 7-2-2-2 run ... ooohhh that hurt

http://users.tpg.com.au/spark69/nf7/pifast51.78.jpg
05-01-2003, 01:43 AM
ctgilles

1 Attachment(s)

Shuttle :D
:banana:
05-01-2003, 08:25 AM
M@tt

:toast: CodeRed I will have to try a little harder tomorrow
05-01-2003, 09:36 AM
reglisse

you uses Version 4.1 of PIFAST but we use the last Version 4.2

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:43 AM.

XtremeSystems