do you find that your slot 1 and 3 clock better than slots 2 and 4??
do you find that your slot 1 and 3 clock better than slots 2 and 4??
As much as we all like to see brilliant chips this thread isn't about having some fast chip but actually being fast ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by trans am
Thanks, kept scratching my head for 2 days, was getting stuck on 34 minutes. But I do not have any USB devices connected, lol, hence didnt change that setting. Will join this thread soon....Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
did a run with a better OS, it seems wazza will play less and less importance with 32M, it will be more about memory/cpu clocks etc now
http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/6...aphsot0003.png
Great run....
Did some experimenting on the board and the ram....
http://i402.photobucket.com/albums/p...Run2_edit2.png
Subs considerably loose for now (exactly what you see in aida64 is whats set ). Yes on air, cool air but air as in no i'm not outside in winter or have a window open.........
Very weak waza ;)
I have a migraine, try to tune them out later after a nap and some advil.
looks like everybody is getting 6min 32s easy now - don't have time for benching due to business trips next 2 weeks but this makes me wanting to re-test :p:
Loosing 2 or 3s against the best guys I am fine with that but beeing beaten by 5s+ from everybody is a shame :rotf:
all the 32s times are with a jeeeegabyte :p: and 1067 7-7-7-x
No luck really with subs at 2200+.
I can pull Twcl into 6 but it's a 50/50 it will pass 32m once you throw a waza in.
Trrd did not like to be touched at all.
Twr could only be pulled into 10.
TRFC was ok for 56.
All in all it really wasn't worth it however, maybe at 2200 flat you can pull it in more but that wasn't putting me anywere near 5 gig so didn't bother for now.
Really wish I knew about the "no memory protect" bs...
Here's my under 6min with new chip.
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/_R.../screen079.jpg
Just a quick run.. Im doing 3d LN2 tonight..
jody is kicking your ass hard dude, 50MHz lower :D
Like I said a quick run... punk arse..... you blind.... :)
i bet charles will chime in now and kick your ass the same with a quick run and call you a noob :rofl:
oh and he will use tight B2B settings of course LMAO
you noticed that too?:pQuote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
testing the mive vs the jigga boards is showing to be slower clock per clock in 32m. hopefully a new BIOS will help it catch up.
:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by steponz
On another note, what did Intel do with these chips...everyone maxing out around the same frequency regardless of cooling. And they don't really respond to cold at all, what's up with that?
There is a conspiracy, Intel is out to piss off all the ln2 guys with sandy biatch..... lol.....
Yea but they will have a surprise about the huge RMA numbers. Everybody will fry their 5.2-5.3GHz Sandy Ballz to get a better one :D
shhhh.... don't tell anybody.... lol
you got a jeega rip it up boy :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Brian y.
nah, had a buddy of mine who has both boards do some testing which confirmed....that I'm not going nuts:nuts:Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
I hate my life rofl 2 more chips 5.28 max 32m so far
seriously, no offence, but post a proper screen shot. i mean, i can't even tell what CPU clocks you are at :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by steponz
yeah your screenshot sucks steponz... :p:
they are about the same i would have to say...but 1 and 3 just seemed to be better for me yesterday before i insulated, so i stuck with them.Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
last night i thought perhaps the CPU was causing the issues, but i am back up today with no issues at all. straight to 5.5GHz at 1.50 2133 7-7-6. so i guess that is a good thing, but it means this board did not like cold memory...or it was simply this kit of memory being bytches sub-zero 7-7-6 like they were on X58.
either way, it's a bit dissapointing :(
My efforts for the evening. Pushing this kit of bbse to the limit. Could never pass 5.7 32m, today I could.
http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/im.../OC/32m-18.png
much much better Zac :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Eldonko
should be interesting to see if you can run the Hypers at 7-8-7 with the same clocks. maybe you'll get luck and 7-7-6 will run :)
seems my bud found a chip very similar to your jody, guess we will give sub 6 a spin. Expecting to be a second off from you or there abouts, My 32m OS tuning skills still suck :PQuote:
Originally Posted by 3oh6
seriously dude, quit blowing smoke up my ass hedging your bets.Quote:
Originally Posted by chew*
we've been in this thread for a couple days without me having to call you a douche, and then you go and say something like this.
so close to co-existing Brian, so close :shakes:
Wow, great chip :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Eldonko
do you guys use the pi.dat tweak?
Jody got a problem with me there are better ways and places to discuss it. I'm very sorry you take offense in me thinking I will be a second or so slower than you.........
On topic.
Decided to play with some PSC.
included settings, have fun.
Nice runs there chew*:up:
I will try this UD7
C'mon guys...is all for fun:D
Updated the ss, didn't realize it sucked so bad...
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=312
Wasn't the best run, literally booted up ran waza with what I was using before.. and bam....
Chip is degraded after running 3d... Wasn't that great of a chip really, gave me a decent 01 and 03 score.. Will get another couple chips within the week.
I dont like to hear this as I plan to run 3d tonight. What voltages were you using?Quote:
Originally Posted by steponz
Yeah.. 1.65vcore on TEC chilled water.. load was 17C on block.. Chip is definitely degraded..Still is good under 5.4ghz.. but anything over.. not so good...
01 killed my other chip.... but that chip had 3 cores in the grave from when I started.... lol... I want a 5.8 chip anyway...
5,4 now, what was it before?
seriously there was nothing offending in that post, just a little self-ironic touch which I personally gave a little smile. take it easy man!Quote:
Originally Posted by 3oh6
don't destroy the harmony in this thread please :) (I am usually not saying something to personal things people seem to have between each other but as I started that topic and love how it turned out I felt like I had to say something - please don't put me on your "badboys list" :p: :D )
thanks for sharing! got some screens of my C43 bios also but need to get home first...4 days business trip, 3 days gf on week-end, monday business trip again...sometimes life is busy and sucks :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by chew*
I also seem to have degraded my best chip - did 5589 at its best times but now it can hardly run 5.5 on air anymore (which was easy at the beginning). sended it to a friend for a session and he managed 5.55 under ln2 but didn't came close to 5580. when he first tried water 5.4 was all he got :eek: looks like past 1.62-1.64V the degrading issues start.Quote:
Originally Posted by steponz
Been benching my 2nd best chip a longer term under air just around 1.55-1.57 and he seems to be fine with it even at high temps (60+ but sub 70).
no I only edit the records.dat for having nice times in the overview when starting pi :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
First time I've heard of 01 killing chips :p:
Hax!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
Shocking. Stock vcore is ~1.0v and we're dumping 50% to 70% more into the chips at ambient temps :DQuote:
Originally Posted by SoF
stock vcore for me is ~1.1-1.2 so it is "only" ~40% imo but still - I wanna have back 130nm...that could at least take freakin' voltage loads :rotf:Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] gomeler
interesting...I have not seen any degradation in my chips. they just die.....Quote:
Originally Posted by SoF
Someone want to borrow mine and kill it for me?
I fail at killing my retail :shakes:
If you find a 5.8GHz version sure, LMK :p:
ok you had me chuckling :ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by G H Z
You are simply not a killer - accept it :ROTF: If there wouldn't be that much water between us (geographically), I would jump over and show you how to do it properly :DQuote:
Originally Posted by chew*
I primed it at 5 gig ( which is its max speed ) and benched it at 1.6-1.7vcore, 2.1 pll, 1.20 vccsa ( because it won't boot higher ) and 1.6 vccsa with ET6 just for kicks. :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by SoF
No clue how people are killing them.
Other chip i'm babying but its a loaner so....
Just thinking out loud here (without having a clue as usual :p: ): there seems to be chips we can call "survivors" and there are "pussies" - just like with GT...some could take 1.5V QPI easy, some died, some could take 1.85Vdimm, some died - as seen before on small production process chips tend to be weaker or stronger. There will be no certain voltages we can really say "it will die or not". There are "safe" voltages e.g. below 1.575V every chip can take without big trouble but past a certain border it is like with overclocking itself - some chips have it, some chips not ;)
€dit: but 1.6 vccsa - damn that does sounds strange somehow your chip is still alive :D must be a golden-voltage-survivor - too bad it isn't a golden clocker ;)
first experience with 2600K - auto timings for now
http://img.i4memory.info/reviewimage...7A-UD7_012.jpg
5.0Ghz 1.390v
http://fileshosts.com/intel2011/giga...6m43s516ms.png
ive tried three chips and none of them could get into windows at such low vcore eeek, how do you always find these chips
next thing you'll tell me it benches at 5.5Ghz :rofl:
make sure you disable No memory execute for 32M Pi benching btw as Jody figured out what was causing him to slow down so much over mine and cheapseat's results.
welcome to the show eva :)
God you gigabyte bastards are killin it lol!
Yeah but a lot of guys apply a bunch of voltage right outta the box ;) and shock them into bench-mode...after that it doesn't seem like they run as well on lower vcore. That's the only thing I've seen change on my 2600 after lots of voltage, it won't POST occasionally on BIOS defaults.Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
an old warrior joining the game - great! :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
without pll overvoltage option the chips seem to need lower vcore as I found out during my first testings (don't look at the time, that was before xmas :p: )Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
5 GHZ 32m @ 1.33V
I need to finally get out my gigabyte-fanboyism I had with DS3P and K8NXP-SLI back in the days - ordering a board as soon as I have some private time again I think.Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
Mr. Splave - yes gigabyte SB boards seem to be getting some good results.
My UD5 is still doing the multi boot on-off dance all the time though - I suppose oscillating between 1.1 and 1.66 cpuv ~30x in an hour doesn't help.
Should probably try to pick up a backup board. :shakes:
Funny thing is my degraded chip can do 1.39 5ghz.... Can't do 3D over 5.4... when it used to do @5.6... Very odd chip..
Thats just have the gigabyte boards roll... they put some great numbers though...Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveRo
its hard to catch hyper with psc for 32m :eek: p8p67 just not strong on memory which it should be for $300 :X not much cheaper then miveQuote:
Originally Posted by SteveRo
EDIT: but no more whining, if it wants psc I will give it psc :D
P8P67 depending on the version is only ~135€ - it's a nice price for such a board, but I agree it does have some issues with hyper.Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
Chew if you wanna kill your 2500K just ship more than 1.5 VCCIO in it,it surely is enough.If it survives that,then i think you have a survivor,much better than that guy at Discovery Channel :D
eva running auto timings :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
Get to clocking that memory :p:
Little update ....
Vqpi 1.14v Vdim 1.8v
http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/4...632078full.jpg
Haha - good catch - eva running auto timings - you don't see that very often!Quote:
Originally Posted by bassplayer
anyone else have this problem...I can bench 32m all day 10x back to back to back but as soon as I try to wazza within the first or second cut and paste BSOD 000000x9c :X
2133 to 1866 didnt solve it so maybe its a subtiming is too tight.
^ did you try in via ocxspitweaker
yeah regular will pass, CDT fails within 5 seconds of starting pi tweaker
Put your subs on auto and try again. If it works set 1 at a time until you know what is causing it.
Weird. Sorry to hear that about hypers....Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
Apparently they are going out of style! :shocked:
try some old school waza. :shrug: its just a file copy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
Beat on this system one more time and sucked the last bit of effec out of this 2500K, I can only hope cache is playing a small role here or the fact that i'm using a full SP3 install with no services shut off. :rolleyes:
lol i wish - seem got another cpu meant for 24/7 low volts but seems got a 52x multi wall right now :(Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
thanks Splave and SoF..Quote:
Originally Posted by SoF
Quote:
Originally Posted by bassplayer
lolQuote:
Originally Posted by SteveRo
still early days while i figure out the ins and outs of memory clocking on P67 platform
Tested a pair of super talent 2200c8 hypers don't like 1T at 2133mhz 8-8-8-24 only 2T for 32M pi. Still have lots of hypers to try and see how it goes :D
Kick some ass george, you always do
6m1s @ 5.52ghz is Teh suck :down:Quote:
Originally Posted by Eldonko
didn't heard of that but just a stupid thought: are you running high bclk? isn't bclk overclocking the entire system-components including sata ports? maybe they don't like it beeing pushed hard? tried using different sata ports (as this is what waaza stresses) or another theory: you are having the cougar point sata issues - tried the 6G ports?Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
sounds promising :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
This one's for you dino :p:
Gonna need more than a 5 gig chip to play with the top 10 boys in a "memory" benchmark :rolleyes:
hahah that is SICK dude. If you had a 5.6 chip that would be 5K LOL j/k
i pwms you noob with my beer tweak lol
http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/7026/img7678wl.jpg
Here is my run on el-cheapo msi with the most ugly bios in the sandy-world :p: Most of the timings are maxed now and one step lower will crash 32m. Already needed some more vdimm for getting trfc at least a bit lower...1.72V or so instead of 1.65 I think.
http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/439...ngs6min382.jpg
http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/8426/msi6min382s.jpg
PS: that gay backround is because it is mandatory in the contest - I hate it and remove it always right after the screenshot :p:
:rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
its a nice quick bench but its gay.
Yes tried both but no luck thanks for the ideas :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by SoF
Are you guys installing chipset drivers and intel management engine drivers? Derp Derp that could be my issue huh? :eek:
No, however i tried OCX tweaker, little less stable with it but no crashes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
I'll stick to the old lame way of cut and pasting, i'm stubborn like that.
I installed both....
hmmmm then I am running out of ideas. I am not installing any drivers just plain "light" win xp sp3.Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
I never had any issues with cw also when I was at my max cpu speed. using pi-tweaker here also (so comfortable, why using the stairs when there is an elevator :D )
what a strange platform. I think eva is on to something with the "Bclk holes"
my chip wont boot 56x100 at any voltage but it boots and benches at 56x100.1 :shrug:
with giga it likes .5 bclk max boot increments, workaround = use eztune 6 for bclk, board will restart fine till you crash a bench at least :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
Mine boots fine at 100.00, then again i'm stuck at 50X multi.....
Going form bios MIT 100.2 is like 100.05, 100.5 = 100.34, 100.6 = 100.43,
100.2
http://img.i4memory.info/reviewimage...2a_bios001.png
http://fileshosts.com/intel2011/giga...6m38s187ms.png
http://fileshosts.com/intel2011/giga...174/aida64.png
http://fileshosts.com/intel2011/giga...174/pifast.png
:toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
My Johnny Walker tweak :D
http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j2...axxmembug2.jpg
my chip hates cold, -38c wont boot windows. waste of single stage powah
Too bad.. My last two 2600Ks did fine on my SS which supposedly runs down to -44oC max... maybe even with the OCZ freeze there was a bit of difference between CPU die and SS...Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
http://i.imgur.com/V93a3.jpg
Best I could do without hyper, not too bad I think :) took alot of work. Any tigher on ram wont boot :up:
wow very nice eff :up:
just had a guess here: the mem remapping feature ppl talk about - might that be also the key to the problem some boards loose in 01 against jeeehhgaballs?
sub 6 bar is about to get raised ;)
Looks like my calculations were off, must be that my 2500K is really less effec.
Msimax just has one thing to say.
Nice work guys! :up:
Really nice.Quote:
Originally Posted by chew*
Does it do 5.6 32M and are you just teasing us? :D
overall max with chip is less with hypers installed
Sorry for going ot but I Just finished reading this thread front to back as I wasn't paying proper attention & chuckled at this "K8NXP-SLI back in the days" I still have one been running proper 24/7 at work @ 2.8GHz for 6 years!!! ffffin good board.
nice chew but do some 5Ghz too biatch
hey MSImax forgot his Tide beerkeg :rofl::D.
and who's the lucky lady LMAO
http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/1...pboard01wd.jpg
http://6.media.collegehumor.cvcdn.co...39aeebe522.jpg
Clean your mouth with TIDE while drinking beer! I'm sure thats healthy. :ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
I don't think he will let me 32m his chip anymore after the second core went kinda kaput after a couple runs........thus why we used 3 which was slower :ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
sub 6 was doable at sub 5500 on 2nd core if i had got the system dialed in before i flaked out that cores imc.
Thats a bummer man...Quote:
Originally Posted by chew*
Find a 5.7+ chip now MSIMax. :p:
Pretty sweet runs this weekend!
Lets see some real benching and get that 480 on LN2. Don't forget Vantage either. :yepp:
hahaha nice guys:up::up::D
wow imageshack police banned my Msimax image :rofl:
And a 5G run.. with wrong CPUZ screenshot:rolleyes:. Any way mem timmings 7-7-6-20
http://www.hwbox.gr/images/imagehost...9477a625ed.jpg