what about subtests? if you do a full run can you also see the subtests. from screens provided it seems notQuote:
Originally Posted by FM_Jarnis
Printable View
what about subtests? if you do a full run can you also see the subtests. from screens provided it seems notQuote:
Originally Posted by FM_Jarnis
Quote:
Originally Posted by M.Beier
hmm I wonder if it scales with heavy raid0 set off standalone raid cards like pcvantage. I'll try both. nice discovery on the LOD. that is very surprising and pat on the back for making it official. keep going m.b. I'll post my finds as well. :toast:
I dont have chance to test that, I dont have any identical SSD, however, since it is 3Dmark and not PCmark, I dont think it would - would be really sad if it does.Quote:
Originally Posted by trans am
I have 4 min left of this damn dl and hopefully it will work. I have fancy raid and a single raptor to test on. I disagree with you there my friend. would it be sad because of pci clocking on a raid set would impair the vga? I can see why in a typical 3d bench scenario and when you have your pci-e bus clocked and how you would have to lower that clock to ensure the raid card is stable but then again. game loading in 3d on a nice raid set go hand in hand. if this is a gaming bench mark then why wouldnt they add extra points for a fast hdd setup? it sorta makes sense to me. i'll check it out.Quote:
Originally Posted by M.Beier
http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/f...smith/3858.jpg
does this look right?
single gtx 460 msi cyclone 768mb
ok, did performance and xtreme presets with my two trusty 5850's 2gb each(880/1135) and 980x @ 4.25ghz~
http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/9...rformancew.jpg
http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/2378/xtremef.jpg
:)
I thought dx11 = no LOD?
CPU/combined tests are not very strenuous huh? Im running 4.75ghz on air for them with ht 980x :confused:
P7512 580 @ 1000/1050
980x 4.75ghz ram 7-8-7 2050 uncore 4ghz
Love the note in the bottom right about Windows 7...Quote:
Originally Posted by trans am
Waiting for the "official" release, I won't have my key from eVGA until then anyway... then I'll post up 860mhz core/4400mhz ram, GTX 580 with 3.72ghz i7 920.
I hope you guys put a signature in each press copy and you're able to trace who breached NDA;Quote:
Obviously online service is not yet enabled. Someone leaked the copy that was provided to the press...
this sucks :(
Something odd going on here.
I'm getting the same scores with single and dual cards in SLI.
I am using 260.99, don't have 265x driver to try.
BTW
Online scores are working for me now.
http://hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?...3&postcount=13Quote:
Originally Posted by PCZ
Links are dead.
Thanks anyway it confirmed what i was seeing.
Looks like the drivers are gone.:(Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
I downloaded the 256 driver from Nvidia, said i had a quatrro.
Used the inf from 260.99.
Seems to have worked
If you preordered your download is now available, seems to be identical to the leaked release:
Quote:
Hello,
3DMark 11 has been released and can now be downloaded. The URL and the login details can be found in the email that contains your registration key.
The first time you run 3DMark 11 you will be asked for your Advanced Edition upgrade key from your pre-order confirmation email. If you skip this step you will only have access to the features in the Basic Edition.
If you have any problems, please see our support pages at
http://www.3dmark.com/3dmark11/support/
Once again, thank you for your purchase.
Futuremark Corporation
920 (21x200) & stock GTX480:
4c/8t:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...1_HT_P5358.png
4c/4t:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...1_4C_P5295.png
4c/4t + physX:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...hysX_P5298.png
^^^ I hate you... :p:
820Mhz:
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1654
http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/9669/820mhz.jpg
850Mhz:
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1927
http://img837.imageshack.us/img837/6114/850mhz.jpg
Pure gpu power bench, thanks Viss ;)
Now look at this ... Score from Advanced version done by my friend, and my score done with Basic. Why in Advanced Max Af Anisotropy is set to 2, when in Basic is set to 1 ?
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1889 ---> set to 2
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/2624 ---> set to 1
it still doesn't detect cpu clocks correctly, same thing for gpu clocks and even memory o_o
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/4863
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/4947
SLI / CrossFire
On
Memory
0 MB
Core clock
100000 MHz
Memory clock
130000 MHz
its over 9000mhz ! :D
My values:
Performance Mode, Benchmarks only.
For me, it's the ugliest Bench ever. :D
Helli
http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/2130/3dm112.jpg
P 9105 Quick run on daily OS drive. 920 @ 4.3ghz 2x5850's @ 1050/1225 10.4 drivers:rofl:
From Hardwarecanucks:
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...-review-9.html
Processor: Intel Core i7 920(ES) @ 4.0Ghz (Turbo Mode Enabled)
Memory: Corsair 3x2GB Dominator DDR3 1600Mhz
Motherboard: Gigabyte EX58-UD5
NVIDIA 263.09 WHQL
ATI 10.10 WHQL
http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/im...GTX-570-92.jpg http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/im...GTX-570-91.jpg
Note: the chart above shows two GTX 570 cards; the upper one should read GTX 580. We are in the process of doing the necessary revisions.
6850 crossfire
6116p
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/7302
GTX 460 @940/4600MHz
Q9650 @4.00GHz
Forceware 260.99 WHQL
Graphics Score
http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/4907/new28.png
http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/6785/...0715001240.jpg
http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/3...0717191569.jpg
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/750
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/4542
I get very low Physics score, but I don't know why. :shrug: Any suggestion?
lol the 6870 IS an upgrade.....
http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/im...GTX-570-92.jpg
CPU 4.2ghz - GPU's 980/1281 : P 8'908 http://3dmark.com/3dm11/7934 just for test .
anyone else get this? tryed updating it via microsoft.com too and wont install .net v4
Uninstall any other Furmark programs, a few reported needing to remove Vantage.Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
Try downloading a standalone .Net 4 installer.
I can confirm mine crashes ALWAYS on the first CPU test. As i said a few posts back, system is perfectly stable under Vantage, 2006, Games, Prime, everything... Even 24/7 usage. Something related to AMD or Hexacores?
if you are on sli setup and 265.90 drivers just compare graphics tests 1-4
everything else all the scores physics test combined test are all outta whack
http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/3882/81472245.png
http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/9103/19227659.png
then I get this, no other version is installed, no vantage installed, deleted 3dmark03Quote:
Originally Posted by zalbard
By the way, our results have the GTX 570 twice @ the extreme preset. The higher performing "GTX 570" should read "GTX 580". ;)
It is interesting to note how AMD's cards tend to catch up quite well at the Extreme preset.
wth.. 3 gtx 580 only have more 2500~ pmarks than 2 5850's ?
something not right with these scores..
...and the CPUs as well: linkQuote:
Originally Posted by SKYMTL
Something not right with crappy Nvidia drivers!:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Loque
Seems that not only AMD has problems with scaling at more then 2 GPU.Quote:
Originally Posted by Loque
its the drivers hence:Quote:
Originally Posted by Loque
Quote:
if you are on sli setup and 265.90 drivers just compare graphics tests 1-4
everything else all the scores physics test combined test are all outta whack
take look at my graphics tests 1-4 everything else is outta whackQuote:
Originally Posted by M.Beier
^ sli 950mhz vs tri-sli 900mhz ^
ok, i'm too late...
Everyone with instability in combined test please try following;
Lower uncore and ram.
Long read, but I'd try some of this stuff: http://social.answers.microsoft.com/...4-1a8e4341d9e6Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
I expect you have re-booted since installing 3D Mark 11. In which case this comment is redundant.Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
However, that was the exact same message I got after installing the benchmark. After re-booting my system, 3D Mark 11 worked without installing any version of .Net (Win7 Ultimate)
the combined results score is totally broken it would seem. if you look at his graphics test score it is SO much higher and the FPS is huge compared to the GTX 580 SLI let alone the Crossfire 5850's I think we can't really judge system based on the overall scores but rather on the graphics test scores.Quote:
Originally Posted by Loque
just tried to run it & got same problem with 1100T.. im gonna go make a thread in amd section if you want to head over there to see if we cant figure out what is going onQuote:
Originally Posted by NaMcO
Someone was saying that tesselation factors relatively heavily into the scoreQuote:
Originally Posted by Manicdan
Found the problem. In my case it doesn't like Everest running in the background.Quote:
Originally Posted by NaMcO
My score just for fun
So you did try the uncore and ram as I suggested?Quote:
Originally Posted by crazydiamond
I had excactly the same message, updating to .net 4 didn't work either.Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
I re installed 3DM11 and it was fine
Like every one bug combined test, bug in vantage after 3D11 installation...
(cpu@4.5ghz)
http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/7800/3d11p10507.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaktus1907
Thanks :up:
3390 points.. stock 6850 and 24/7 system cpu 4000/nb2800/ mem1600 7-8-7
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/12992
Viss thanks for that > interesting :)
im disappointed that even pro version doesnt have subtest results i can view offline.........
980x 4ghz
2x 5870 stock
6gb 1880mhz 7-8-7-20-1t
-P7954 3DMarks: http://3dmark.com/3dm11/27184 :rolleyes:
-X2918 3DMarks: http://3dmark.com/3dm11/28068 :down:
stock 580 bios/cooling
http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/5828/61057992.png
my result ati5850@1090/1300
click here
can anyone explain why when I run a 3d mark the video is really tiny and only in the centre of my middle screen (eyefinity). I have tried setting it to the resolution I have and it still just gets a bunched up in the centre of my middle screen. I can't figure this out at all. Any help would be great!
Quadfire with some oldies:rolleyes:
P15127
http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/9767/3d11p15127.jpg
First time retail 980X 3013A489 clocks with single HD5870 at 4.0Ghz vs 4.2Ghz @1025/1263 - 6pts diff LOL
4GHZ = 5,086
4.2GHZ = 5,092
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P6T...51263_5092.png
I am happy the CPU doesn't matter all that much in these tests actually. This IS 3D Mark....not CPUMark....
if a new game doesn't scale in SLI/CF we wait for NVIDIA/ATI to update their drivers
how is this different? :)
wait for new drivers
We need this subtest to show offline and they need to fix the bug where you need to submit from a DX11 VGA PC instaed of saving the file and submit from any PC or Laptop , Big security flaws too. Can we have a Real FM Staff answer some questions on this tread ? I would like to herr from them on what the community needs are with this new benchmark.
Regards: Chispy.
We are having am open discussion about this in a tread in hwbot: http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=14584
i ran it on my 6850.....
completely stock - P3200
vga @ 875/1100 - P3482
vga @ 925/1100 - P3646
vga @ 925/1100 and cpu @ 3.9 - P3486 :S what the #$%^ is that about...
none of the tests scored higher than 20 fps... in some way i'm really disappointed in my new graphics card.
CPU i7 960 4.7,
GPU 480 gtx 950/2050
P6852
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/66719
Single card on Icicles :rofl: 1025/1050
7681
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/73864
Dual card 950/1050
12156
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/73633
Need to try those 265 drivers it seems :up:
cheers to finally having a straight 3d bench :oscar:
980x on air passes at 4.81ghz the whole bench :D
so wait let me see if I am reading this right. Sandy Bridge i5 at 4.8GHZ is only 3000pts behind a 4.8GHZ 980X int he physics test despite a 2 physical core and HT difference totally 8 THREADS.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chri$ch
thats unreal... Sandy Bridge looks truly AWESOME
finally got sli to work for me thanks to reading here..
cpu hyperthread off.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...I_score_sm.png
Does anyone see a performance difference changing the (Standard settings in AMD/Adjust Image Settings on Nvidia) from it's default (typically called Balance) to Performance?
3x5870 at 1050/1200 with 10.5a cap4
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/110287;jsess...AXmp0CYQ52cLHf
http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/1...1110501200.png
FYI: We plan on fixing that oversight.Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Oversight fixed.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dmark11/download/update/
v1.01 patch now available. Also includes a bunch of bug fixes. Does not affect scores (except in some multi-GPU cases improves Test 6 score that was previously showing incorrect results). v1.00 scores are still valid as well.
Thanks for the update, one thing i had in settings online to hide submitted results automatically, and when v1.00 results submitted they were hidden. Updating to v1.01, submitted results seem to be public and not hidden now ?Quote:
Originally Posted by FM_Jarnis
run at http://3dmark.com/3dm11/236250
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P6T...1200_13258.png
Not sure what's up with the hidden/public thing. Will investigate tomorrow.
Hidden/Public issue fixed. It wasn't a new thing - it appears that if you uploaded a score without being already logged in and then logged in, the result got to your account but the settings flag wasn't checked at that point (and result went public). If you were already logged in (cookie in your browser) then everything worked.
Both cases work now.
Well thank God for the subtests. Cheers for that!
v1.01 MAX settings
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/261819
900/2200 tri-sli stock cooling
http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/6211/89670663.png
http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/8803/95097428.png