Conroe 2.4Ghz on 965G mobo, brief test...

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

04-13-2006, 03:39 AM
Vassili

Quote:

Originally Posted by Waus-mod

The top model is the Xtreme edition and costs 1000 ;)

Yes, but the XE doesn't come until Q4 2006, so the 6700 wil be the topmodel when Conroe wil be introduced.
04-13-2006, 04:35 AM
Waus-mod

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vassili

Yes, but the XE doesn't come until Q4 2006, so the 6700 wil be the topmodel when Conroe wil be introduced.

Who talks about retail haha :P
04-13-2006, 05:39 AM
iboomalot

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by iboomalot

very nice results vs mine

4400+ @ 256.5*10=2565mhz
winrar3.61
multi=1140
single=676
-------------------
Conroe E6600 @ 266*9 =2400mhz
winrar3.61
multi=1120
single=675

so far in SuperPi Conroe is kicking tail which Intel shines at
Cinebench95 Conroe is doing well matching my 4400+ at 2.68 ghz \
Winrar is a bit closer with the 4400+ needing 2.56 ghz

granted the above is done at crap timings 3-4-4 will revise once my OCZ-EB arrives on thursday. Need to RMA my redline too :(

Either way if Conroe's 2.4 ghz can OC to 3.0ghz on water for 316.00 , could be very tempting to change.

Update info with OCZ EB at 3-3-2

4400+ @ 249.7*10=2497mhz
winrar3.61
multi=1238
single=713
-------------------
Conroe E6600 @ 266*9 =2400mhz
winrar3.61
multi=1120
single=675
04-13-2006, 08:04 AM
TarTheDark

Your clock speed went down and still the results are better.

Apparently WinRAR is quite memory dependant.

Let's wait and see what Conroe can achieve with faster RAM.
04-13-2006, 08:09 AM
Rocket

Quote:

Originally Posted by iboomalot

Update info with OCZ EB at 3-3-2

4400+ @ 249.7*10=2497mhz
winrar3.61
multi=1238
single=713
-------------------
Conroe E6600 @ 266*9 =2400mhz
winrar3.61
multi=1120
single=675

I read this thread for Conroe results, not AMD results. For AMD results I go to the AMD section.

Showing results of an overclocked X2 that you`ve had a year to tweak and play with is redundant. These Conroe results are from a chip that isn`t even for sale yet, and no one has proper hardware to truely support it.

If you want to show off your X2 ...start your own thread in the AMD section please. :nono:
04-13-2006, 08:12 AM
NiCKE^

Let us see some results when we have a board which can be tweaked and doesn't have a bugged bios ;)
04-13-2006, 08:14 AM
Donnie27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vassili

Nice pricelist, but do you really think Intel is going to sell it's top-model for just $530? I don't think so, if you ask me it is more like 700/800 maybe even 900.

But the E6700 model isn't the Top Model. It's just listed as the fastest for that first shipment.
04-13-2006, 08:19 AM
mine

Quote:

Originally Posted by iboomalot

Update info with OCZ EB at 3-3-2

4400+ @ 249.7*10=2497mhz
winrar3.61
multi=1238
single=713
-------------------
Conroe E6600 @ 266*9 =2400mhz
winrar3.61
multi=1120
single=675

he doesn`t surrender .....
and so
my respect ..what a brave amd fighter
04-13-2006, 08:29 AM
Donnie27

Quote:

Originally Posted by White Wizard

Good link Donnie, and I'm glad to see that there are people to do more than blindly slander and slash people's reputations with little or no evidence to the contrary. Alex and I have worked hard on our own times, and monetary budgets, to maintain integrity in SM2. To Conroe's credit and desgin it does well in SM2 because of it's balanced architecture.

What will be more interesting, is someone running the 64-bit version of SM2 upon a Merom, Conroe, or Woodcrest upon 64-bit Windows-XP. Also, Alex and I are preparing to build with compilers other than Microsoft, who do not have vectorization support in their compiler. More importantly, we will be utilizing Intel's and AMD's high performance math libraries to measure not only linear algebra but also signal processing (FFT) performance and utilize multiple cores as well. I think with these improvements, as well as integrating my Quantum Monte Carlo code SM2 will be greatly improved and offer people a better picture of performance.

Thanks man! I like it when you guys take the time to try help folks understand. If you guys are convinced Conroe is Strong, Balanced and etc.. then that's great! It's you guys' version I wished they'd used and I don't truely expect the House version to be fair if it were made or sponsered by Intel or AMD. I don't really trust either to be fair.

The Conroe Demo was different IMHO! They didn't want these Webmasters coming back to clobber them. That is if Intel Hoodwinked or tricked them.
04-13-2006, 09:31 AM
ORCBEAST

Quote:

Originally Posted by mine

he doesn`t surrender .....
and so
my respect ..what a brave amd fighter

Hehe :)

True true you have to admire that :p:

Hes setup is shy 3mhz of running 100Mhz faster than the conroe. ;)
04-13-2006, 02:16 PM
iboomalot

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rocket

I read this thread for Conroe results, not AMD results. For AMD results I go to the AMD section.

Showing results of an overclocked X2 that you`ve had a year to tweak and play with is redundant. These Conroe results are from a chip that isn`t even for sale yet, and no one has proper hardware to truely support it.

If you want to show off your X2 ...start your own thread in the AMD section please. :nono:

This thread is to show how good Conroe is and Iam showing where Conroe has certain advantages. I never said who is better or faster since by his 2.4 vs my AMD having to run above his clock means is more eff.

Cinebench is very fast on conroe and yes timings on winrar could be hurting its showing.

as far as tweaking I put BRAND NEW ocz-eb ram in and reset my 11 multi to 10 and ran the test I don't think 5 mins with the new ram and running my X2-4400+ at 2.5ghz when I can run the CPU over 2.9ghz would be considered "showing off".

Just giving a comparison between the two units is all.

and why would I surrender my AMD when Conroe isn't due out till July/aug. and we haven't seen any OCing ablility yet. If Conroe responds like the mobile units then Conroe will be the CPU of choice this fall and maybe even for 07 if AMD doesn't respond with some improvements.

***looks in AMDs direction***
04-13-2006, 02:42 PM
CanadianTSi

The Winrar Benchmark is HEAVILY dependant on ram...
04-13-2006, 03:06 PM
iboomalot

1 Attachment(s)

for an old CPU she does ok :D
04-13-2006, 06:15 PM
Plaicd

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeBar

I really would like to check this mobo out. Too bad that it's not available yet... :(

Not sure exactly what this say's but looks like its for sale in Japan.
Always a good sign it might be coming to U.S. soon.

http://shopping.itmedia.co.jp/PriceL..._ID=1060407244

Seems 38,480 Yen=About $324 usd
04-13-2006, 06:58 PM
Rocket

Quote:

Originally Posted by iboomalot

for an old CPU she does ok :D

Nice thread crap.

Victor is a pioneer of sorts and is nice enough to display his results of the Conroe in a thread about the Conroe. The first guy to actually have a working Conroe on this forum.

You on the other hand are doing what`s already been done.
My guess is you saw what others could do with an X2 and purely copied it.

Spamming here only shows what an AMD troll you really are. :slapass:
04-13-2006, 07:02 PM
Absolute_0

Calmn down, it's not a thread crap, he's just overclocking his 4400+ for comparison #s on the Winrar bench.
04-13-2006, 07:10 PM
iboomalot

Absolute I posted that OC just for Rocket's benefit.

He is a noob and can't take a joke so let him call me names all he wants since I like to contribute to the forums unlike the Conroe noobs who flocked to the forum to worship the comeback of Intel to the highend market.

but you are correct Absolute I wasn't thread crapping but giving comparison info for people when I updated my info on the last page.
04-13-2006, 08:34 PM
alpha0ne

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rocket

Nice thread crap.

Victor is a pioneer of sorts and is nice enough to display his results of the Conroe in a thread about the Conroe. The first guy to actually have a working Conroe on this forum.

You on the other hand are doing what`s already been done.
My guess is you saw what others could do with an X2 and purely copied it.

Spamming here only shows what an AMD troll you really are. :slapass:

I really am getting sick and tired of these type of posts, maybe a little editing/deleting would be in order :mad:
04-13-2006, 10:54 PM
alpha0ne

Quote:

Originally Posted by LOE

now whos going to buy the pentium crap with conroe comming :P

nubs :D
04-14-2006, 01:26 AM
ORCBEAST

OO I cannot wait to see how the 3.3Ghz 1333FSB 85w chip is gona do. I think its gona fly ! Victor plz tell me you are getting one next week :p:

I saw FCG posting his getting that Albatron board. Then we can see some Conroe OC benchies ;)

Albatron sure did a good job with that board. On paper anyway ^__^
04-14-2006, 01:43 AM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by ORCBEAST

OO I cannot wait to see how the 3.3Ghz 1333FSB 85w chip is gona do. I think its gona fly ! Victor plz tell me you are getting one next week :p:

I saw FCG posting his getting that Albatron board. Then we can see some Conroe OC benchies ;)

Albatron sure did a good job with that board. On paper anyway ^__^

I guess I'll help Victor out as he's probably not going to be able to post here until he gets back from out of town. He's told me that nothing of that caliber is available quite yet...Expect to see the 2.66 Conroe next ;)
04-14-2006, 02:00 AM
M.Beier

Hmm, I wonder, how the heck can we get 500-600FSB on a mobo???
good cooling + 3.33ghz 333FSB @ 600FSB 6ghz - And YES I LOVE TO SEE THE PERFORMANCE of such :P
Stephen, 1 week, 1 week mate, then the x850 series battle continues :p:
04-14-2006, 03:04 AM
boostedevo

That's impossible right now I think as I haven't seen a PLL chip over 450MHz in a board yet. I was/am hoping the Conroe boards will step up with a 500MHz+ PLL or clock generator, but I guess we'll have to wait and see what they come out with. Right now I'd still consider 450FSB max and that would be on some pretty good NB cooling. Most people probably won't even be in that ballpark.
04-14-2006, 03:28 AM
maratus

Quote:

Originally Posted by CanadianTSi

The Winrar Benchmark is HEAVILY dependant on ram...

QFT
4-4-4-12 @ 667 mhz is crap anyway

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page