here's my new record on pi with my 3000 winny 0447
http://img165.exs.cx/img165/9489/30s5bf.th.jpg
:banana:
Printable View
here's my new record on pi with my 3000 winny 0447
http://img165.exs.cx/img165/9489/30s5bf.th.jpg
:banana:
GAH. Where and when did you get that one? All I can find is CBBID :(Quote:
Originally Posted by kakaroto
At this frequency you should take 29" .... ;) ....Quote:
Originally Posted by chillingdude
0448 spmw with dod
http://membres.lycos.fr/m4inaction/A...%20(Large).JPG
http://membres.lycos.fr/m4inaction/A...%20(Large).JPG
the systeme:
http://membres.lycos.fr/m4inaction/A...%20(Large).jpg
:stick:
Glad to see you here DarkNico
Nice O/C :slobber:
:toast:
CBBHD 0447 UPCW
BOXED AIR 33c idle
http://www.xs4all.nl/~famchow/A64_32.../2.7_boxed.JPG
Hello, I cannot put this stable or i cant join to OS if I do more than 2700Mhz, Which could be the reason? maybe cpu memory controller?
I can do 270*10 , 9*290 , more FSB crashes because >2700Mhz.
I prefer to stay at 290*9 because 270*10 with 1.66Vcore is too much (36/50 temps).
Right now im at 290*9, more FSB and i cant join to SO, or I must to put vcore till 1.66,11.7 and inestable. My HSF is XP90+Enermax. Any tip to improves that OC?
http://img74.exs.cx/img74/3214/superpi261018ki.jpg
i know but i think thats due al the :banana::banana::banana::banana: on my pc.Quote:
Originally Posted by vkbms
or memory maybe.
i am reviewing Gskill pc4800 2*256 for [M]
so next week is testing week
anyone seen this stepping for a 3000+?
CBBHD 0450 TFFW
Here´s my 0450 tpfw winchester:D
http://img56.exs.cx/img56/6660/5min25sec3ox.jpg
FriGidi, cooling and temps?
Watercooling & open window (-5c fresh Finnish air:D)Quote:
Originally Posted by =[PULSAR]=
Here is mine 3200+ WPAW 0450 not a very good stepping under -45°C. More Vcore means for this cpu less mhz or not stable. 1,6Vcore is the max. Going now for 3000+ they are much better I think
http://people.freenet.de/benches/2960.JPG
I got one winnie 4 days ago, it is
CBBID 450 WPMW, it does 2450MHz on def. vcore and 2637 (9x293) at 1.6V. Not bad, but i will be looking for something better :)
Whats better.... 295*9 or 265*10 ?
yesterday someone posted this on a forum
so 9x is betterQuote:
gamer was right!
254*10 ( 2540mhz ) gives me 32s
But 273*9 ( 2457mhz ) still gives me 33s!
Dont understand, 32s better than 33s, is it SuperPI 1M time no? So better 254*10.
I thought that was better 295*9 because more FSB, but i dont know for sure.
Maybe for gaming is better 295*9 for greater bandwitdth, i need some answers ;)
look carefull
its 100 mhz less and 1 sec less so if he puts on 9x 2450 the result is better:)
Diamonddog something isnt right. Giving that cpu clock and those timings at those speeds 30Second 1M is really high.
hmm don't know whats wrong. Sometimes it is 31s sometimes it is 30s.
It should be 27" .....Have you optimized the OS?Quote:
Originally Posted by =[PULSAR]=
no I didn't optimized anything. I installed my os with all my normal programms. It should be 27sec??? why that?
When you place dividers; you are couner-balencing he cpu clock speed by increasing the HTT to a higher value. Thus increasing your FSB so your RAM runs faster.Quote:
Originally Posted by xavicl
I only run at 295*9 when benching my pc and wanting to get my max RAM speeds. Most of the time I just run 265*10...
Hope this helps,
Alec
CBBHD 3200+0447TPDW BOXED AIR
http://home.pchome.com.tw/cool/c785song/DFI/2802225.JPG