thx,this is not a Review>>>>1 game!!! damn This site skimpy
Printable View
more and more...
http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/1593/gtxtitan65.jpg
http://img547.imageshack.us/img547/5073/gtxtitan64.jpg
@Tha Last Meal well, they call review. :rofl: Do they fried the VRM Titan who came to them for testing? :ROTF:
Where did you get those from btw?
http://www.overclock.net/t/1362327/v...-previews/1550Quote:
I also have all the images from Guru3D review:
Below is the analysis based on framerate in different games tested by Guru3d at 2560*1600 resolution.
http://www.overclock.net/content/typ.../1000/flags/LL
Nvidia GTX Titan is almost 40% faster than AMD HD 7970 GHz Edition.
It is 55% faster than Nvidia GTX 680 & 11% slower than Nvidia GTX 690
Silly mid range GK104s pretending to be high end all this time, look what happened after AMD fixed their drivers and the real Nvidia high end comes out!
^^ Exactly.
If you havnt already seen it, check out this benchmark video for the Titan by Linus:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJ30Q...layer_embedded
Most amazing benchmark video I've ever seen!
I don't see shops that sells it yet..
Also I just found out that I cant SLI a 690 with my 680, so if I did want to buy something new, my options would be a second 680, or a Titan and sell my 680.
The second option seems better, but I dont need nor have the cash for it, but maybe in the future.
I heard that sales will start at 2 PM.
i Think the review will Begin After less than 3 hours
When you see the AVP Ares result compared to a Titan, damn, still such a long way until a single GPU will get to beat such a beast.
I think AvP is heavily bandwidth dependent. With 512bit and GDDR6 maybe :)
The "real high end" will be availble 11.25 months after the "fake" high end.
Although GTX680 outperformed the 7970 by 10% at launch, NVIDIA should have charged $300 for it, because they had a better part in development that would end up launching a year later.
:shakes:
Rule of teh intarwebz:
If NVIDIA is doing it, their reasons are to steal from you. If AMD does something, they did their "best" and that is "good enough".
:shakes::shakes::shakes:
It's pretty obvious this card wasn't ready a year ago, and that its pricing is due to a. sharing the sales with the much more lucrative professional market b. NVIDIA's deal with TSMC changed and these chips cost more than previous big chips c. AMD has no competitor and won't for 9-12 months.
I won't buy a $1000 video while I currently have two similarly performing $400 cards. But if I was in the market for graphics for my main rig, I'd buy this before any CF/SLi rig. It looks like a good card, the best the world has ever seen.
As consumers we can bemoan the $1000 price tag, but we have no real clue what the reasons are for the pricing. Even worst case scenario "they cost a nickel to make and they forecast sellouts at $1000 each" we can't really say much because there's only one word for a company who would not do the exact same thing: stupid.
Im wondering if there will be a cheaper 3 Gb version released any time soon? I wouldnt mind one of those for 500-600 GBP and selling my 680.
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/produc...914&subid=1576
839.99 .... Noty :(
Regarding the monitor (refresh rate) overclocking feature of Titan. I just found out that my 120Hz gaming monitor is capable of 129Hz. Anything higher and the monitor notifies me it's out of range. Does anyone here with electronics knowledge know whether this can cause damage, even when the monitor will sync?
827 GBP @ Scan:
http://www.scan.co.uk/shop/computer-...0-(2688-cores)