I quote. Same here with Vista 32 sp2 and Nvidia GTX285
Printable View
Love this program!, I remember using the old version back then and it totally owned my OC. Gets the results quick so you can move on to your next OC ^^.
hi guys love the overclocking and how helpfull you are but can you help me PLEASE
i have a gigabite ep45-ud3r and i have 4x2gb of corsair xms pro 800mhz @4.4.4.12 (the one with the lights on) website i brught it from below sorry for the sise
http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/4GB-(...-activity-LEDs
i have a q9450 i have the cpu stable @3.2 using ibt (excellent programme thanks to agent god)
but im wanting to hit 3.5 but the only problem is that i have to overclock the memory by 78mhz but i dont know if it will be ok for 24-7 i have had it stable with 2x 2gb of memory but i know that 4 sticks of memory puts more stress on the north bridge what do you guys think will i be ok for a good for a few years with the memory overclocked im thinking atleast 4 years
THANKS TO ANYONE THAT CAN HELP :)
ps here is the website i have my rig on so you can see it hope you like it (and yes it is a delta ffb1212ehe 120mm fan on my true cooler)
http://mypcrig.com/rig/209/1
No joy running the v2 IBT in XP Pro 32 SP2/3. This is what I get whenever the app is launched:
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1246317188
Any suggestions?
Missing one or more of these:
Code:- Microsoft(R) Visual C++ 2008 Runtime (x86), can be found here:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=9b2da534-3e03-4391-8a4d-074b9f2bc1bf
- Microsoft(R) .NET Framework v2.0 (minimum), can be found here:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=0856EACB-4362-4B0D-8EDD-AAB15C5E04F5
The .NET Framework v2.0 did the trick. Many thanks.
http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/7339/ibt40loops.png
[my current system as the signature]
i have tested both on Vista (x64) and Win7 (x64), it have the same result.
passed IBT 40 loops but freeze when test with Prime95 / Othos. at 7th hrs
i didn't blame IBT but i have no idea :shrug:
... Yep, IBT can find the unstable system quicker than Prime95 / Othos.
i like IBT :clap:
AgentGOD, could you write something down on the first post of how many times/passes you should run IntelBurnTest to say that you system is stable?
under the Readme-IntelBurnTest folder is says "3. Select the run # (should use at least 5 at minimum, no more than 20)" but on post #9 it says "I would use something like 20 tests over 5."
this will help a lot, especially when I forward this link to someone so they can read about this test and know how many times we should run it.
this is a minor bug
given 11111 times to run it does 13, 19 or so and stops reporting a "success", my cpu is obviously not stable after so few runs and more importantly the linpack.exe crashes but at this point the intelburn executable is deceiving us about the reason of the sudden end.
http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/3...2009033907.png
http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/2...2009033859.png
Updated to v2.3!
- Added latest Linpack binaries and patched for AMD CPUs
- Added Xtreme Stress Mode (Right-click the "Start" button)
The new binaries seem to have fixed the problem, reports the error now, and more quickly and reliably now.
lucky me has overwritten the v2.2 when v.2.3 appeared, now this experiment cannot be proven again, that was the case with 1.92 - 2.2
the conditions weren't that special, this happened many times before.
hot Q 66 @ 3.6 GH
http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/6411/ibt36gh.jpg
AgentGOD, are you alive? :p:
I have tested IntelBurnTest v2.3 on WIndows 2000 Professional with Service Pack 4 and have found it to be nonfunctional.
I would get an error: "The dynamic link library [DLL file] could not be found in the specified path...".
IntelBurnTest v2.3 seems to be missing some DLL files to function properly.
The files include:msvcr90.dll
msvcm90.dll
mscoree.dll
[Possibly others]
For the next release of IntelBurnTest, please include the necessary binaries to run IntelBurnTest.
EDIT: After rereading the first post to this thread it seems that IntelBurnTest has the limitation that iti requires Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0. Most unfortunate.
Hi there, I was testing my Q6600 + TRUE + SlipStream 1.900RPM on a Gigabyte EP35-DS3L board. PSU is an Topower 520w, HD4850 [nothing to do with this...], and 2x2GB SuperTalent 800mhz + 2x2GB Mushkin 800mhz.
So, I had 3.6GHz @ 1.55v. It had 20h in Blend on Prime95. I've put the test with Thread's manually setted in 4, and got an error.
I started lowering frecuency, to 3.1GHz @ 1.55v, and it continued to be unstable.
Then changed to 333x9 [3GHz] @ 1.4v.
6 times, 4 threads, standard -> Error.
Standard, 6 times, Auto threads -> OK.
High, 7 times, threads Auto -> OK.
Standard 7, 4 threads -> error.
Standard, 10 times, threads Auto -> OK.
So, is it really unstable or it's just setting 4 threads the problem?
Hello, nice app, thank U for that.
I've got question. I cant get pass 8 threads, first run is always ok, second always failure. I read it doesnt mean my settings are unstable right? 16 thread works fine 5 run at Very High.
Second thing,
Cant get Maximum Stress Level. When setting it and start, app is closing becouse there is no ram to run ;) Im running it on 7
here is my first test.
http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/793...oad999241t.jpg
Why yes. If you guys are trying out Xtreme Stress Mode, you need to let IntelBurnTest run by itself and not touch your computer until it's finished running :) It basically squeezes the most resources out of your PC it can and reserve it all for IntelBurnTest to use, hence "Xtreme Stress Mode" :P
If you've read the first post, Core i7/Skulltrail users need to manually set 16-threads.