Haven't bought it, will feedback tomorrow>>>>>>>:(Quote:
Originally Posted by Nettwerk
Printable View
Haven't bought it, will feedback tomorrow>>>>>>>:(Quote:
Originally Posted by Nettwerk
on action, trying the lowest voltages possible
http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j2...ephen/3710.jpg
will update again tomorrow.
E6600 (running 3,42 @ default VCore <-- I don't think it's the bottleneck)Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultrazauberer
Its the bottleneck....
Re-mount your cooling correctly and set 1.55v vcore temps should not be over 60c or so in dual 32m.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenofstephen
u mean it touches the nb-cooler? mine doesnīt...
anyway i donīt think this will cause any troubles...
It is blocking one of the corners, not a big problem though....Quote:
Originally Posted by Alonso
this is just for fun, don't ask me anything about this photo:D
you should know why :)
http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j2...10-06_2052.jpg
time to bed, should be no problem till tomorrow:)
http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j2...tephen/230.jpg
tell me all yuor bios voltages form vcore, vnb and I will try to replicate approximtaley what you are doing on my retail board. Vdimm I will set according to my ram, vcore and vnb i will use your settings approx and adjust a little if required....
regards
Raja
vMCH 1.85v (I have set higher just in case...)Quote:
Originally Posted by raju
vdimm 2.2v (set higher to make sure it is stable also)
vcore - depends on your CPU, isn't it?
e6600 stepping 5 es, so far fails all the way from 1.5v in bios all the way to 1.61 and over (bios) over 400fsb, also taking into account of vcore is 0.06 lower than bios if measured with dmm (myfriend OPB confirmed this) . Same cpu on PRO board 1.47 in bios (1.53) actual is 425fsb stable, 8 hours orthos same ram 1:1.
Tried cas 5 with loose timings and also used memset to adjust all secondries real loose still no joy...
Ram all the way to 2,35 can't pass orthos so far 1:1 over 400fsb, any priority blend on this board. Extra cooling of the NB too, with fans...
maybe you have a good board, better than retail. I am not the only one failing and there seems to be no other answer....
Regards
Raja
here is my asus pro results, with same hardware...
edit vcore 1.47 (1.53 actual) same ram...
http://img345.imageshack.us/img345/8338/380745gx3.jpg
and another...
http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/2342/382511dw8.jpg
this board (ABIT) needs extra vcore than my previous board,Quote:
Originally Posted by raju
it is about 0.05v more required for the same clock, but it is not hotter afterall....
goodnight dude 2AM here
yeah i try all the way past 1.61 too still no go....
regards
Raja
so here we are 1.63 vcore in bios (probably 1.56-7 actual)
vdimm is 2.35(way more than required)
vmch is 1.9v
410fsb
ram timings spd.
http://img416.imageshack.us/img416/55/410failci4.jpg
geez. this is frustrating to watch. lol.
no one can get more than a few mhz above 400 fsb orthos stable on this board!
makes me want to get rid of this board. ugh.
but looking at that other thread (the one about 975x chipset boards doing 420+ orthos stable) it seems like no 975x chipset can do high fsb.
i wonder if i should just get a p5b deluxe... sigh.
yeah... i stopped benching cause i couldn't break the 400fsb... after i get my waterblocks i'll test again, not sure it'll make much diference, but at least i can say my mobo has been pimped... lol :stick: :stick: :stick: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:
yes only a few board have made it past 402fsb with a retail board at all, kenofstephen has a red board....
I know I am capable of overclocking past 400fsb with other boards, I'm no noob.
My PRO pics prove that..
regards
Raja
Quote:
Originally Posted by raju
try 412 FSB, 0.025 more vcore, good night, I am sleeping on my bed now:D
maybe it's red kryptonite.... and we have the black one... :stick: :stick: :stick: :banana: :banana: :banana:
well the only benefit for me is that i'm going to be running a 6700 so for me to get above 3.6 ghz, i only need a fsb of 360+ which seems to be a walk in the park for this board.
questions:
does the 4:5 ratio work properly on this board?
and if it does, which gives better results, 1:1 or 4:5?
for example:
9 x 400 1:1 vs. 10 x 360 4:5 (ram should be effectively running at 450ish).
anyone test this?
according to an arcticle i've seen on the xbitlabs, having the memory at a higher frequency than the fsb will get you very little performance increase. timings however is a diferent thing... that is if i understood the arcticle correctly... :p:
anyone tried the AW9D (non-MAX) board yet? might consider it, if it has the same potential as the MAX. likely to be paired with a E6400.
For also very it is complicated here to pass the 400FSB. :(
with a 6400 i really doubt it... it will need even more fsb than the 6600.
you'd be limited to 400fsb +/- which means 3200Mhz. and i think those cpu's can do a lot more...
For good clocking cpu's with low multis, the best way to go is 965 imho.