anybody?? whats the result for 3dmark06 at 4ghz 200x20 cpu score on vista 64??
Printable View
anybody?? whats the result for 3dmark06 at 4ghz 200x20 cpu score on vista 64??
Bios 1001 is no longer a beta, it's official on asus website.
They don't list all changes in the chagelogs...or short definition actually. I';ve never seen a changelog on these things. There very well could be minor bug fixes in these for memory issues, voltages that aren't acting right, mem timing issues, boot issues...the list is endless. I've been keeping up with them every now and then. I've noticed that my system acts better. Please don;t ask me to quantify that. I think you guys know that you geta feel for these things by using them alot. I've just noticed that stuff acts better. It's boots smoother, I don't get the hangs on DET RAM and stuff like that. I also noticed I have been able to use a wider rtange of settings without OC fails. Just general stuff like that.
I can say that alot changed with 0805, but I'm on 0903 now and it works great too. I'm gonna load that 1001. It'll be good to get into the thousands just to say I did even if it didn;t improve anything yet. :D Heck it might improve and I might not realize it until I stumble onto something.
I know there are alot of issues with folks when they go over 200 BClk, qand that's where I'm headed as soon as I get my water going. The "Rocket" (my computers name) is about to blast! :up:
Just that quick I updated that BIOS to 1001. Going to change my sig now. I'll mess with more OC'ing and tweaking when I get my water stuff here. It should be here next week.
Thanks for the head up Jas. I just checked the site lastnight and they didn't have it up there.
guys, i need some help from urs.......
my i920 can boot into windows with 192 * 21 w/ HT & Turbo mode.
so i guess it can run at 200*20..........
but try many many times,it really cant boot in windows even the bios screen oso nv show out..... = ="
so any ideas all?
my spec:
Asus R2E-Bios V1001
Corsair Dominator DDR3 1600 C8 3*2GB
my setting for 200 blck:
AI overclock - manual
OC from CPU level up - auto
OC from Memory level up - auto
CPU Ratio setting - 20
CPU configuration
CPU Ratio Setting - 20
C1E Support - disable
Hardware prefetcher - enable
Adjacent Cache line prefetcher - enable
Intel Virtualization tech - disabled
CPU TM Function - disable
Execute Disabled bit - disabled
Intel HT Technology - disable
Active Processor Cores - all
A20M - disabled
Intel Speedstep tech - disable
Intel Turbo Mode tech - enable (Not shown if Speedstep is disabled)
Intel C-STATE tech - disabled
BCLK frequency - 200
PCIE frequency - 100
DRAM frequency - DDR3 1603MHz
UCLK frequency - 3208MHz
QPI frequency - auto or Manuel Value
Dram timing control
1st iformation - Insert Timings Here in 8-8-8-24 -60-8-6-auto
2nd information - Insert Timings Here in auto-auto-auto-auto
3rd information - Insert Timings Here in 5-5-14-10-10-X-X format
EPU II phase control - full phase
Load-line calibration - enable
CPU differential amplitude - auto
Extreme OV - disabled
Current voltage 1.54v - 1.812v - 1.35v (May be different)
Cpu voltage - 1.475 v
CPU PLL voltage - auto
QPI-Dram voltage - auto
Current voltage 1.131v - 1.508v - 1.111v - 1.508v
IOH voltage - auto
IOH PCIE voltage - auto
ICH voltage- auto
ICH PCIE voltage - auto
Current voltage X.xxx v, X.xxx v, X.xxx v ,X.xxx v
DRAM Bus voltage - 1.65861v
DRAM REF voltage - auto
Debug mode - string
Keyboard TeakIt comtrol - disabled
CPU spread spectrum - disabled
PCIE spectrum - disabled
CPU clock skew - auto
IOH clock skew - auto
so why is a lot of ppl getting a lot of cpu scores different
some online scores show 3dmark06 on vista cpu scores 7400
furturemark orb shows as 6900
Updated Frontpage with Official Link of 1001
http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/f...PackFailed.jpg
If I choose 1/2 or 1/4 of available memory for the test, no error comes out. What does that tell us (if anything)?
It seems like this Bios changing every two weeks is keeping everyone busy. We update the bios and go through hours of extensive testing with all kinds of benchmarks only to do it all over again in a couple of weeks. But that's why i'm glad I got this motherboard. In my opinion the Motherboard is the most important component when building your system. For a long time i thought it was the CPU or RAM but it's definately the motherboard. Some nice Ram just makes things so much easier. I have my money set aside for those new Corsair GT Modules. I wish they would hurry up and come out.
Ok guys.. Well there is annoying news...
Well i havent got my board back yet but they did call in later today and letting me know that my powersupply has minor fault in it and suggested me to get another so i told them cant i get a replacement and he goes yep, did u get it from us and i go yup so i told him the invoice number and so hes putting it in by the time he made the call. so i may not even get it till either tommorrow or maybe next week now..
Bah... that powersupply was running fine and i dont understand how it had a minior fault in it..
I just hope everything else thats in there have no faults in it..
As I suspected, It probably isnt a fault as such izzy, more a compatibility issue, hence those beep errors you were getting.
I know how frustrating it is I've lost count of the amount of stuff i've had to rma in the last two years.
On the bright side though, you will be up and running soon and flying on that set up!:up:
Yep, PSU. See? That's why i said that about the PSU first. It's the first thing I look at. These things require good clean and strong rails. If they fluctuate, or they droop under load, that is a "no go". You can't diagnose anything else until you get that issue resolved, becasue flaky or weak rails will cause havok with these systems.
It might have another issue too, but until you get the PSU sorted, you can't judge anything else. It's quite posible thr PSU could solve things completely.
Im using a Galaxy in my rig now, in fact mines only the 850w version, as I said before the newer revision version of these psus are just fine.
corsair psus or power and cooling ones seem to be the best around atm.
Oh ok, Thanx :)
I'd just hope it wont do this type of thing again.
Sumtimes it makes me think i shuldnt do another motherboard change for a couple years now due of wat it culd of done to the powersupply or such.
But i do regret of getting the striker II and the QX9770 cpu tho i shuld of research a bit more on the upcomming cpu's and such so i wuldnt either come across of changing the motherboard for the i7 cores.