IntelBurnTest - The new stress-testing program

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

05-15-2009, 03:46 PM
AgentGOD

Quote:

Originally Posted by glide 1

this is what i get:

http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r...1/itberror.jpg

That means you did not extract everything and keep the directory structure intact.
05-17-2009, 01:04 AM
grimREEFER

jesus, i had to do a small vcore bump on something that was 36 hours prime small fft's stable to get 10 maximum runs here.
great feeling to have it pass though.
btw, agentGOD, you rock, and i think you made prime obsolete.
05-17-2009, 02:06 AM
kiwi

Quote:

Originally Posted by AgentGOD

Or anything else not mentioned?

Some kind of temperature monitoring. Sure there are other programs but would be cool if it were all in one :)

Keep up the good work :up:
05-17-2009, 07:43 AM
andressergio

Very nice AgentGod as winter came i have 22C inside my room and i was able to do a quick test of your app as this batch is very low vid 1,1875 i have to be careful with temps.

http://img198.imageshack.us/img198/2...coreibtsti.jpg

Cheers :up:
Sergio
05-17-2009, 09:04 AM
AgentGOD

Nice chip, I want it :D
05-17-2009, 09:05 AM
andressergio

lol

Thanks :up:
05-18-2009, 06:57 AM
Brama

I tried new IBT 2.0 with an Asus Rampage II Extreme and a Xeon W3520 with HT enabled under Win7 x64 and I was not able to load cpu cores at 100%.
Is there any button/command that I haven't seen or is it an issue of the new program?
05-18-2009, 09:45 AM
WaterFlex

Great job, Agent!
05-18-2009, 02:15 PM
AgentGOD

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brama

I tried new IBT 2.0 with an Asus Rampage II Extreme and a Xeon W3520 with HT enabled under Win7 x64 and I was not able to load cpu cores at 100%.
Is there any button/command that I haven't seen or is it an issue of the new program?

Intel said in a documentation to disable HyperThreading before running this test.
05-19-2009, 02:59 AM
rvp

AgentGOD, i just want to say Thanks for this great program. I've been experiencing problems for some time and thought it was a hardware failure because my system was 24+ hours Prime stable.
But Linpack failed just after the first loop. So I corrected the voltages and now everything works great. :up:
05-19-2009, 10:34 AM
gugle

Q9550 @ 4250mhz

MemTest86+ = OK!
IBT v2 Standard = Success!
IBT v2 Maximum = freeze :(
05-20-2009, 01:37 PM
AgentGOD

Updated IntelBurnTest to v2.1!
- Optimized error-checking code, reduces CPU overhead
- Now displays more accurate ending time
- Simplified graphical user interface further
- Improved color of captions in the GUI
- Added ability to override the number of threads for Linpack to use (as requested by users)
- Added display of progress in the title bar
- Now outputs current time for each iteration to log file (hh:mm:ss)
- Now auto-scrolls output list to the bottom as results are outputted
- Fixed a GUI quirk
05-20-2009, 01:58 PM
AgentGOD

Core i7 users, please confirm if the new thread-forcing feature is working :D

Thanks, and enjoy!
05-20-2009, 02:11 PM
justin.kerr

Quote:

Originally Posted by AgentGOD

Core i7 users, please confirm if the new thread-forcing feature is working :D

Thanks, and enjoy!

Seems to not be working? unless I did something wrong?

http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b140/hoss3430/ibt.jpg
05-20-2009, 02:14 PM
AgentGOD

Quote:

Originally Posted by justin.kerr

Seems to not be working? unless I did something wrong?

http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b140/hoss3430/ibt.jpg

Try letting it run at least two iterations, see if CPU usage goes up.
05-20-2009, 02:31 PM
justin.kerr

Same results?
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...s3430/ibt2.jpg
05-20-2009, 02:34 PM
AgentGOD

Hmm... try changing it to Auto/16.
05-20-2009, 02:35 PM
justin.kerr

Lol, I thought the same thing, tried both, still same. :(
05-20-2009, 03:09 PM
AgentGOD

Quote:

Originally Posted by justin.kerr

Lol, I thought the same thing, tried both, still same. :(

Hi, please check your PM for a beta version :)

#EDIT:
If anyone else with a Core i7 CPU wishes to test the beta, please PM me.
05-20-2009, 03:35 PM
AgentGOD

Ok, I've updated the release version, please re-download via main link. Should work fine with threading now.

Also guys, if you could, please test using 64-bit OS and forced 8-threads on a quad-core (like a Q9xxx/Q8xxx/Q6xxx) and Custom memory size of 64 MB, with 10 runs. (Just a tiny experiment, I'd like to see)

Because according to my little experiment, my Q6600 isn't stable. Failed within 1.76 seconds of doing this test, but passed the Standard test fine @ Auto threading (4 threads).

See screenshot:
http://i43.tinypic.com/11lpf05.jpg
05-20-2009, 03:42 PM
jcniest5

Agent, is it possible if you could add a module to support temperature display as well? I know we can run other temp monitoring program to do that, but it would really be nice if you could add a module so the correct temp of each core are displaydd somewhere also. Thanks...
05-20-2009, 03:43 PM
AgentGOD

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcniest5

Agent, is it possible if you could add a module to support temperature display as well? I know we can run other temp monitoring program to do that, but it would really be nice if you could add a module so the correct temp of each core are display somewhere also. Thanks...

It's possible, but then again, what's the harm in running RealTemp/EVEREST side-by-side :P That's what I do.
05-20-2009, 03:54 PM
Cyber-Mav

i get that same error on my q9550 when i run 8 threads, 64mb test.
05-20-2009, 04:14 PM
jcniest5

Quote:

Originally Posted by AgentGOD

It's possible, but then again, what's the harm in running RealTemp/EVEREST side-by-side :P That's what I do.

Well, I just thought with running just your program by itself without others, it may minimize other outside errors that indicate a fake instability whereas if we run just one program, the is no possibility of an outside cause, that's all.
05-20-2009, 04:28 PM
fatguy1992

I just downloaded the newest version, awesome work, great program :up:

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page