BOINC benchmark: post results

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

05-03-2010, 06:32 AM
Vinas

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReKcOlNu

FYI those core temps are useless and misleading! AMD and Intel rate their CPUs by Tcase which is what the bios reads. Core temps are not the same as the CPU temp. You should use the monitor that came with your motherboard or similar that displays the single CPU temp like the BIOS does, that is the only CPU temp reading you can actually use and compare to AMD/Intel max CPU temp ratings.

I think UncleWebb would disagree, unless I'm missing something. Doesn't coretemp and Realtemp read the internal register (temp probe) on each cpu? To my knowledge it does and is generally accepted as the defacto standard for at least Intel CPUs. Is this not the case for AMD chips or something??? :shrug:
05-03-2010, 03:01 PM
ReKcOlNu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vinas

I think UncleWebb would disagree, unless I'm missing something. Doesn't coretemp and Realtemp read the internal register (temp probe) on each cpu? To my knowledge it does and is generally accepted as the defacto standard for at least Intel CPUs. Is this not the case for AMD chips or something??? :shrug:

Email I got back from AMD said, to monitor CPU thermals use the single CPU temp reading, not the core temp readings.

If you look at AMDs tech docs for K8 and newer chips they use Tcase to rate the chips max temp, not die or core temps like they did for the old Socket-A K7 chips. AFAIK Intel has always used a Tcase rating.
05-03-2010, 04:57 PM
ReKcOlNu

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrDucky

you can add my boinc ver if u want its 6.10.43 and im running win7x64 :)

Im glad im second :P

But your #1 in FPU, at least in the last couple pages of results. ;)
05-03-2010, 05:09 PM
slaveondope

Nice graph RekcOINu
05-03-2010, 07:21 PM
AMD-C

http://imgur.com/Nihlj.png

Code:

5/3/2010 11:18:20 PM||Benchmark results: 5/3/2010 11:18:20 PM|| Number of CPUs: 4 5/3/2010 11:18:20 PM|| 3952 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 5/3/2010 11:18:20 PM|| 8718 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU OS: Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit BOINC: 6.2.28
05-04-2010, 05:24 AM
ReKcOlNu

Quote:

Originally Posted by slaveondope

Nice graph RekcOINu

Thanks! Wheres your X6?
05-04-2010, 05:53 AM
MrDucky

nice graph if every one could post it liek that, then we could post it in the Topic start and help people choose the best boinc version and processor
05-04-2010, 07:37 AM
AMD-C

http://imgur.com/uL2mm.png

Code:

Starting BOINC client version 6.2.28 for windows_intelx86 log flags: task, file_xfer, sched_ops Libraries: libcurl/7.19.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8i zlib/1.2.3 Data directory: C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\BOINC Processor: 2 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz [x86 Family 6 Model 23 Stepping 6] Processor features: fpu tsc pae nx sse sse2 mmx OS: Microsoft Windows XP: Professional x86 Editon, Service Pack 3, (05.01.2600.00) Running CPU benchmarks Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks Benchmark results: Number of CPUs: 2 3160 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 6360 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

http://imgur.com/T1jUi.png

Code:

Starting BOINC client version 6.2.28 for windows_intelx86 log flags: task, file_xfer, sched_ops Libraries: libcurl/7.19.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8i zlib/1.2.3 Data directory: C:\ProgramData\BOINC Processor: 4 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz [Intel64 Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 11] Processor features: fpu tsc pae nx sse sse2 pni mmx OS: Microsoft Windows 7 Enterprise: x64 Editon, (06.01.7600.00) Running CPU benchmarks Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks Benchmark results: Number of CPUs: 4 2329 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 5103 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
05-04-2010, 02:51 PM
AMD-C

http://imgur.com/QKOzg.png

Code:

Starting BOINC client version 6.2.28 for windows_intelx86 log flags: task, file_xfer, sched_ops Libraries: libcurl/7.19.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8i zlib/1.2.3 Data directory: C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\BOINC Processor: 4 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5504 @ 2.00GHz [x86 Family 6 Model 26 Stepping 5] Processor features: fpu tsc pae nx sse sse2 mmx OS: Microsoft Windows XP: Professional x86 Editon, Service Pack 3, (05.01.2600.00) Running CPU benchmarks Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks Benchmark results: Number of CPUs: 4 2138 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 4734 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
05-04-2010, 04:22 PM
ReKcOlNu

Well unless noted in the members post I'm assuming if you are running a 64bit OS then Boinc is 64-bit also?
05-04-2010, 04:23 PM
MrDucky

well i hope so for the people otherwise it sucks lol xD
05-04-2010, 05:01 PM
ReKcOlNu

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrDucky

well i hope so for the people otherwise it sucks lol xD

I just figured both x86 and x64 versions were in the Boinc installer and it would auto install the 64-bit version if it detected a 64-bit OS?

EDIT OK got a PM from PaganII and cleared that up as he's running boinc x86 on 64-bit OS,.... so take the Bionc "bit" in the charts with a grain of salt. :p:
05-04-2010, 05:12 PM
slaveondope

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReKcOlNu

Thanks! Wheres your X6?

As requested. All stock(undervolted) on Win7x64 with BOINC 6.10.18 64bit
The 955 was on 6.10.18 64bit too.
05-04-2010, 05:27 PM
ReKcOlNu

Quote:

Originally Posted by slaveondope

As requested. All stock(undervolted) on Win7x64 with BOINC 6.10.18 64bit
The 955 was on 6.10.18 64bit too.

Thanks!

Sort by Integer
http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/9306/bench01.png

Sort by Floating Point
http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/8880/bench02.png
05-07-2010, 05:07 PM
mAJORD

I've noticed, for some reason the x64 version of boinc gives a much Lower score for FPU on AMD CPU's.. (about 25% higher on x86) Anyone know why?
05-10-2010, 04:27 AM
kiwi

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcool

16,5k integer? Holy crap... looks like Linux does beat Win in this bench. Curious to see the difference in actual crunching times

yep, just run on ubuntu x64 and getting 4k/21K @4Ghz E8400. I will try running a few nights under ubuntu to see the actual output. Win7 was getting 4.3/8.8
10-29-2010, 05:32 AM
bluestang

Work PC as listed in sig...

Code:

10/23/2010 12:43:40 PM Running CPU benchmarks 10/23/2010 12:43:40 PM Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks 10/23/2010 12:44:12 PM Benchmark results: 10/23/2010 12:44:12 PM Number of CPUs: 2 10/23/2010 12:44:12 PM 4216 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 10/23/2010 12:44:12 PM 8454 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU 10/23/2010 12:44:13 PM Resuming computation
10-30-2010, 07:12 AM
Nikolasz

Thats mine BOINC benchmark: post results

quad 9550 :
2884 whetstone per cpu
8456 dhrystone per cpu

and cuda gpu
432 GFLOPS peak

http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/8781/snap0005.th.gif

Is not much i know, i dont like ocing. It kills smooth ride like weard os behavior, os crushes, and exploding electronics
10-30-2010, 07:44 AM
haschioz

29/10/2010 7:36:20 PM|| Number of CPUs: 2
29/10/2010 7:36:20 PM|| 1848 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
29/10/2010 7:36:20 PM|| 3490 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
t4200
10-30-2010, 08:05 AM
kaok

Q6600 G0 3.0GHz, Ubuntu 10.04 x64.

2785 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
14642 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Dhrystone MIPS in linux is somewhy much better. Not sure though, how much that makes overall difference.
10-30-2010, 10:20 AM
sRHunt3r

1 Attachment(s)

Here's my new one with Win7 64 and boinic 6.10.58 64.
Attachment 108975
10-30-2010, 03:05 PM
PoppaGeek

What am I not understanding here. A one cpu @3.5gz gets 8824 and another @2.3 gets 10342. What do these numbers prove? I am lost here. :shrug:

http://img.techpowerup.org/101030/benchamrk.jpg

Top one Opteron 1354 @2.4gz bottom Opteron 8356 at 2.3GZ
http://img.techpowerup.org/101030/bench.jpg
10-30-2010, 03:26 PM
Nikolasz

i call that overclock data loss.

your not spesific anyway.
Maybe some overvolt will help, or some other too tight timings

if your using one pc and oc it up and down...
and enable/dissable cores it will free up cache, so then rest of cores got more cache..
10-30-2010, 03:46 PM
bearcatrp

Dual quad E5420's running ubuntu
2940 whetstone
15000 dhrystone

Dual quad E5640's running win7 pro
2668 whetstone
6923 dhrystone

Not sure why my harpertowns are beating my westmeres. :shrug:
10-30-2010, 04:26 PM
PoppaGeek

Going by the charts above my 2.4gz opterons are beating a Athlonx2 @4gz, a Phenom2x4 @4gz and a i7 920 @3.8gz. I get very similar numbers on the 8356 @2.3. Of course they do not show this in PPD so what do these numbers mean?

http://img.techpowerup.org/101030/bench1.jpg

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page